I was alerted that some pastor out there is demanding I answer for why abuse occurs in egalitarian spaces too (instead of just complementarian). I must have the guy muted bc I don't have any notifications from him (I was just sent the screenshot).
But I'll answer.
Because this is easy.
First, you should read @lweaverswartz#StainedGlassCeilings. It is brilliant (as I have said before). Drawing on her substantial study of Asbury Seminary (egalitarian) and Southern Seminary (complementarian),
she argues that because both still "center white married men and decenter other standpoints," both continue to reinforce male authority/power over women (although they do it in different ways).
Listen to her thesis: "evangelicalism in both its complementarian and egalitarian..
expressions buttresses constructions of meaning and power that center men" which "raises weighty questions about evangelicals' capacity to embrace the kind of equity and justice they claim to seek." (p. 163)
Why does abuse still exist in evangelical egalitarian spaces?
Well, because (and this is my Second point) the problem isn't complementarianism per se--the problem is that patriarchy undergirds all of white evangelicalism. White evangelicalism centers white men.
The most dangerous places for women are in spaces that center men the most and
place the most doubt on women's truth-telling and the most weight on protecting the "good" men who are 'fantastic bible teachers' instead of their victims (just go check out the SBC). Egalitarian spaces which have more mechanisms for women to be heard and are attempting to....
dismantle androcentrism are less dangerous for women--but that doesn't mean the danger is gone. Until we uproot the human sin of patriarchy altogether within Christian spaces, men (especially certain kinds of men) will continue to be centered at the cost of those on the margins.
Instead of playing the "they are bad too so why should we change our behavior?" game, we should be asking why male leaders like Bill Hybels and Johnny Hunt (and others I am not naming...)continue to be not only tolerated but celebrated by evangelicals across the spectrum.
As I said in #MakingBiblicalWomanhood, complementarianism is patriarchy and patriarchy is about power. Abuse is more likely for women within rigid patriarchal spaces, but any system that continues to center men over women will continue to treat women as less than men.
Yes, those who espouse egalitarian theology should be better. But the reality is that uprooting patriarchal systems that flow through every aspect of our lives will take time. Simply recognizing the full equality of women theologically isn't enough to get rid of patriarchy.
We have to actively work to decenter white men and raise up those on the margins--not to replace white men but to give everyone a seat at the table. Because that is what Jesus calls us to do. Just read the New Testament.
BTW--recognizing that abuse occurs in egalitarian spaces is recognizing that patriarchy is systemic. It is reinforced by theology, but it exists apart from theology bc it is a human construct. So thank you, pastor, for proving my thesis with your question trying to invalidate it.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
There is a difference between understanding the good news of the Bible and understanding the socio-cultural context that frames the biblical world which informs the historical interpretation of text.
Everyone can do the first.
Everyone cannot do the second—at least not in an equally responsible way.
The second requires an openness to learning, a reputable education, intellectual humility, and significant time invested in study.
In-house training schools and unaccredited degrees do not equal accredited seminaries, colleges, and universities.
Greek lexicons are not the equivalent of scholars who have spent decades learning and reading ancient Greek texts.
I have a great deal of understanding toward everyday Christians who believe patriarchy (male servant hood or whatever you want to call it) bc I know this is what they have been taught.
I find I have less understanding towards the pastors and leaders who teach it.
It is true that most of these leaders were taught the same way. I get that. It is also true that as leaders we carry more responsibility—which means we should be esp humble about interrogating our positions on issues that involve power dynamics.
I’m so grateful for those pastors entrenched in patriarchal systems willing to listen and learn.
I’m least understanding of those who have the opportunity for dialogue and choose not to listen.
One of my very astute students yesterday made the observation that scholars who are challenging the grand narrative are often accused of being “presentist”(which is mostly used as a negative slur)…..
whereas folk who are *actually* doing presentist scholarship (ie uncritical application of modern values to the past) are usually not labeled as such bc their work supports the status quo…..
To be clear: 1) I understand why people believe patriarchy is God-ordained 2) I think marriages often function egalitarian even if they claim male headship 3) For those who ascribe to complementarianism--I do not question their faith & I'm willing to work with them
However
4) I think patriarchy is wrong. I cannot say otherwise. 5) Even though many folk who ascribe to Xian patriarchy never experience its dark underbelly, that doesn't mean it isn't there. 6) Good people can still be complicit in harmful systems of oppression.
My goal is to help people without academic training to have access to the same tools & scholarship I do.
I hope this will help them see historical reality of patriarchy, which I hope brings understanding that complementarian beliefs stem more from culture than faith.
Hey, y'all, remember my promise to engage @MikeWingerii's videos on women? I am really excited to be sharing next week @anxious_bench about a fantastic new resource that will address Wingerii's discussions by Andrew Bartlett and @TerranWilliams4. So look for it next Tuesday :)
1. It is some SBC pastors who have tried to restore Johnny Hunt. Not the official SBC stance (@bartbarber made this clear).
2. It is also 1250 SBC pastors who signed statement calling for disfellowship of churches who hire female pastors...
It is not official SBC stance.
3. It is also an SBC pastor who confirmed Hunt’s speaking at a conference in February 2023. This pastor is also one of signatures on list of 1250 calling for disfellowship of churches with female pastors.
4. All this is close on heels of
the release of horrific revelations about obstruction of victims of sexual abuse and the enabling of abusive structures by SBC pastors & leaders.
Official SBC stance may be against restoration of Hunt. But the face of the SBC is pastors once again valuing abuser over abused