It's one place where you have to remain indoors for an extended period of time without a mask. There are ways to reduce risk. It's important to be able to assess risk as well. Here is what I look for.
1/12
Before I go, I ask the following questions:
- do you have HEPA filters in every room?
- do you have barriers between rooms?
Those are the two things I need before I go.
I also ask if they know anything about the ventilation and they usually answer they don't.
2/12
When I go, I bring my CO2 monitor and check to see if I can hear the ventilation or check the thermostats to see if they are "on" and not "auto". If they are in auto, I let them know. If the CO2 > 800 ppm, I won't go back.
The hygienist/dentist/assistant always wear masks. I would prefer N95s, but they often don't. Some people request they wear N95s. For me, I just accept it as a risk that they will wear only surgical masks.
4/12
Fallow time between patients is good. With good air cleaning, it doesn't need to be long since the rooms are small.
I don't wear a mask over my nose, although some people do it.
5/12
Assessing Risk
I wear a N95 until I get into the operatory. There are two risks for transmission - shared room/close range transmission with the hygienist/dentist/assistant working on you and long range transmission from other rooms.
6/12
For short-range/shared room transmission, the risk is low just because you are exposed to only a couple of people. Chances of them being infectious are likely low.
Graph from @Kit_Yates_Maths . I've added gridlines.
7/12
Even unmasked, the risk from long range transmission is very low. This is because: 1. HEPA filters 2. Barriers between rooms 3. Not an environment where unmasked people are talking a lot
8/12
Other unmasked patients are sitting quietly.
On this graph, yellow is aerosol generation from breathing. Pink is talking and blue is singing. Risk from transmission by an infectious person exhaling is generally low.
Summary:
- low probability that the hygienist/dentist/assistant is infectious
- I require barriers between rooms and HEPA filters
- I check ventilation and won't go back if it's bad
- low risk of long range transmission because other people aren't talking
11/12
Additional measures you can take:
- ask the people working on you to wear a N95
- wear a mask over your nose
- ask about fallow time
Everything involves risk. I educate where the risks are, how to mitigate and let people make their own assessment.
12/12
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I was shipped this PC fan box and put it together. It looks really good. I think for many situations, this is the best option out there. Here are some thoughts about it.
1/11
I stated earlier on my blog: we need a PC fan air cleaner that is durable and looks good. While durability and looks are not the most important aspects of air cleaners, many companies want that. We now have it.
2/11
It took me about 1.5 hours to put together. It was a little more difficult than the @cleanairkits ones because Clean Air Kits uses plugs to snap the fans on instead of screws. This could be something adjusted in the future. 3/11
The blood libel is a deep scar from Jewish history. Jews were accused of slaughtering Christian children and baking their blood into the matzah we eat on Passover. It lead to pogroms against Jewish communities where many Jews were massacred.
We just witnessed a new blood libel created over the past day. Unverified claims by Hamas were promoted by MSF, the UN, politicians and many major media outlets.
We've seen the resurrection of all the classical antisemitism: pogroms, massacres, blood libels, death squads
This is a description of the Khmelnytsky massacres in Ukraine 1648–1649.
Since I first published this post, there have been multiple experiments showing ozone is a concern when using far-UV and needs to be taken into consideration.
In the post, I discuss how initially we didn't think it was a concern. I think ASHRAE needs to update their guidance on different UV wavelengths.
I have far-UV in my house. I think for personal residential use, it can be used in a limited way if you understand the risks with ozone and mitigate it with open windows when in use. That's how I use it.
Here are the equivalent clean airflow rates from the recent ASHRAE Standard 241 Control of Infectious Aerosols. I've calculated the equivalent air changes per hour and the equivalent CO2 (if all the clean air was outdoor air).
These rates are doubled when there is "vocalization above a conversational level" (e.g. singing)
I'll be hosting a space with the chair of the committee @WBahnfleth to discuss these rates and more. Please join and message for any questions you have. twitter.com/i/spaces/1gqGv…
To determine the ACH and CO2, I had to make assumptions about density and metabolic rate. I used values from ASHRAE standard 62.1 or found the closest approximation. If densities are different, the equivalent ACH would be different. It doesn't affect flow/person or CO2.
What should you ask about your indoor air quality?
There are things individuals can do to improve the IAQ in their own space, but it ultimately falls on the building owners and operators to provide clean air. Here are some things you should ask to know about the IAQ.
1/10
1. Outdoor Airflow (OA)
- Is the system constant volume or variable volume?
- If it is constant volume, what is the airflow to the room (in cubic feet per minute [CFM] or liters per second [lps])
- if it's variable volume, what is the max and min airflow?
2/10
- what is the minimum OA % supplied during occupied hours?
- what is the occupancy schedule?
- is the system always running during occupied hours/auto mode?
- how often is it checked and maintained?
"We need HEPA filtration, CO2 at 600 ppm and 100% outdoor air everywhere"
I see these types of comments non-stop. They are wrong and unhelpful. They show misguided ignorance about indoor air quality and what is actually required.
I'll start with filtration - you do not care about the filter efficiency. You care about the system effectiveness which is measured as a clean air delivery rate. MERV-13 with 300 cubic feet per minute (CFM) is identical to HEPA with 230 CFM. There's no reason to prefer HEPA.
Furthermore, air handling units can't handle HEPA filters. Demanding this is absurd when it will only increase cost and won't provide any benefit over MERV-13.
Having MERV-13 as the standard is sufficient for particulate matter issues.