But instead of giving it a simple open-ended prompt, we taught it how to use some of the techniques used by the best legal writers in the world.
Check out what it came up with—if only more legal writers wrote this well. 1/x
To celebrate the upcoming launch of Write.law's new AI legal writing practice, we had our team work with GPT to write a motion from start to finish.
All we used was a simple list of factual details, some legal research notes, and our teams' prompts.
2/x
If you'd prefer an interactive version of the whole motion (complete with breakdowns of how we got GPT to craft each part of the motion) check it out here: write.law/writing-walkth…
Ok, let's break it down!
3/x
Use a deep introduction to do the work for readers.
☑️ GPT's intro paragraph orients you to the background of the case. Then it breaks down the key issues using specifics.
☑️ Judges love introductions that give them a cheat sheet of what matters like this.
Summarize the story with a quick movie trailer.
☑️ Consider beginning your fact sections with a quick movie trailer that gives readers the big-picture storyline at the outset—as GPT did.
☑️ This helps readers see the forest before the trees.
Craft factual headings that categorize each major group of details while also highlighting specifics.
☑️ Fact headings are a powerful way to highlight specific details from a section—as well as organize the factual details into a few manageable categories for readers.
Capture what matters from your fact paragraphs in the first sentence.
☑️ Distill the main takeaway from each paragraph at the outset. That way busy readers always know what matters, no matter how quickly they skim your document.
GPT agrees.
Surgically quote only what will help your readers.
☑️ If you find a good quote, use the smallest snippet that will serve your reader. Otherwise, let your better writing shine through.
Keep procedural standards short, to the point, and in plain language.
☑️ Most of your legal readers probably know the basic procedural standards (especially if it's a judge). So don't waste time with pages of legalese. Keep these sections short and easy to read.
Roadmap your points.
☑️ Readers love roadmaps. Number off your reasons or your sections or your categories, and it's almost impossible to get lost (so long as you stick to the map).
Stay tuned for the launch of the first AI-powered legal writing training, available only on Write.law!
I'll also give a shout-out to @BriefCatch and @legalwritingpro because a lot of the tuning we had to do were things I know for a fact BriefCatch would fix with a click. GPT + BriefCatch may constitute an entire top-notch lawyer!
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Dry, dense legal issues in the hands of incredible legal writers at @omelvenymyers, @SidleyLaw, @McDermottLaw, @JennerBlockLLP, @troutmanpepper, @BlankRomeLLP, @DorseyWhitney, and Kellogg, Hansen?
Easy-to-read and easy-to-understand briefs.
Let's see how (a🧵1/x)
Responding Done Right.
Many legal writers pen their responses and replies as if their readers had carefully memorized every detail in the prior documents. No.
Check out how the @omelvenymyers pros remind you of enough specifics in a reply so that you can understand now.
Usually, we can lead with our affirmative pitch: The question the court must answer is X, and here are the tools to answer that question.
But when you need to take opposing views head-on, use your opponent's words against them and immediately provide specifics to combat them.
What happens when legal writing pros at firms like @JennerBlockLLP and @bsfllp tackle a tough case?
Fantastic legal writing lessons for us all.
Check out how some of the best lawyers craft the crux, prime audiences to win, and list their path to victory! /x
Introductions are everything.
Legal readers these days want the specific questions and answers at the outset. If they can decide your case in five minutes, all the better!
Start by orienting readers to what your document is about and the questions they need to answer.
Prime with context.
If readers might be set out against you (as is often the case when appealing an adverse ruling below), prime readers with helpful context so they are in the best headspace to receive your argument.
@Disney's complaint against Florida is a master class in advocating through pleadings.
A killer ToC, emotional priming, and surgical quoting give us a lot to learn from!
1/x
☑️ Emotional Priming: Reframe the Bad Facts.
The greatest legal writers don't run from the bad facts.
Instead, they often manage the bad in a couple of ways: (1) providing counter facts that detract from the bad or (2) reframing the bad facts so they look better.
☑️ More Emotional Priming: Shifting the Focus.
Now let's look at the other sort of emotional priming: sharing favorable details to detract or redirect your reader's attention.