But instead of giving it a simple open-ended prompt, we taught it how to use some of the techniques used by the best legal writers in the world.
Check out what it came up with—if only more legal writers wrote this well. 1/x
To celebrate the upcoming launch of Write.law's new AI legal writing practice, we had our team work with GPT to write a motion from start to finish.
All we used was a simple list of factual details, some legal research notes, and our teams' prompts.
2/x
If you'd prefer an interactive version of the whole motion (complete with breakdowns of how we got GPT to craft each part of the motion) check it out here: write.law/writing-walkth…
Ok, let's break it down!
3/x
Use a deep introduction to do the work for readers.
☑️ GPT's intro paragraph orients you to the background of the case. Then it breaks down the key issues using specifics.
☑️ Judges love introductions that give them a cheat sheet of what matters like this.
Summarize the story with a quick movie trailer.
☑️ Consider beginning your fact sections with a quick movie trailer that gives readers the big-picture storyline at the outset—as GPT did.
☑️ This helps readers see the forest before the trees.
Craft factual headings that categorize each major group of details while also highlighting specifics.
☑️ Fact headings are a powerful way to highlight specific details from a section—as well as organize the factual details into a few manageable categories for readers.
Capture what matters from your fact paragraphs in the first sentence.
☑️ Distill the main takeaway from each paragraph at the outset. That way busy readers always know what matters, no matter how quickly they skim your document.
GPT agrees.
Surgically quote only what will help your readers.
☑️ If you find a good quote, use the smallest snippet that will serve your reader. Otherwise, let your better writing shine through.
Keep procedural standards short, to the point, and in plain language.
☑️ Most of your legal readers probably know the basic procedural standards (especially if it's a judge). So don't waste time with pages of legalese. Keep these sections short and easy to read.
Roadmap your points.
☑️ Readers love roadmaps. Number off your reasons or your sections or your categories, and it's almost impossible to get lost (so long as you stick to the map).
Stay tuned for the launch of the first AI-powered legal writing training, available only on Write.law!
I'll also give a shout-out to @BriefCatch and @legalwritingpro because a lot of the tuning we had to do were things I know for a fact BriefCatch would fix with a click. GPT + BriefCatch may constitute an entire top-notch lawyer!
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Legal tech used to be something most lawyers could safely ignore.
You needed an email. You needed PDFs. You needed to survive the firm’s document-management system. But the machinery underneath? That could stay with IT.
In the age of AI, that’s no longer an option. 🧵
AI now touches legal research, contract review, litigation strategy, legal writing, firm operations, and law school classrooms.
Lawyers do not need to become engineers, but they do need a working vocabulary.
So here are the AI concepts every lawyer should know by now: (2/10)
1️⃣ Artificial intelligence is the broad category.
It covers tools that do tasks we associate with human intelligence: spotting patterns, classifying information, predicting outcomes, recognizing images, generating language, and more. (3/10)
If you’re still thinking about “prompt engineering” as a spell-casting exercise, you’re already behind.
Let’s slow down and get clear on what’s actually happening. 🧵
An agent is a system that can break a task into sub-tasks, decide what to do next, evaluate intermediate outputs, and revise its own work.
Instead of one prompt and one answer, you get a loop.
Think less “question and answer” and more “junior associate with a workflow.” (2/7)
The new reality: workflow > wording.
When you’re using an agent, the real leverage is upstream and downstream:
What materials you feed it, how the task is staged, what checkpoints exist, who verifies what, what tools it can access, and what it is forbidden to do. (3/7)
The Supreme Court just heard a major case: whether the President can use a 1977 emergency-powers statute to impose tariffs.
The private respondents—represented by Neal Katyal and a team of elite advocates—filed a merits brief that reads like a legal writing masterclass.
🧵
☑️ Open By Telling a Story, Not Stating a Rule
Most lawyers launch their briefs with procedural history or legal standards.
The best legal writers do something different—they tell a story first. Before readers can care about your rule, they need to care about the stakes. (2/6)
☑️ Turn Your Opponent’s Own Words Into Your Best Evidence
There’s no more devastating move in legal writing than using the other side’s own words against them.
When your opponent concedes a point, don’t let it slide by—put it center stage. (3/6)