An astonishing article. In 20 years of working cases involving classified information, I never - not once - encountered prosecutors who wanted to get a search warrant and reluctant - even refusing! - agents. The other way around, sure.
The article points to a damning fear in the FBI stemming from political fear, not from fact.
“The FBI agents’ caution also was rooted in the fact that mistakes in prior probes of Hillary Clinton…had proved damaging to the FBI”
Really? Name one. I’ll wait.
“Some of those field agents wanted to shutter the criminal investigation altogether in early June, after Trump’s legal team asserted a diligent search had been conducted and all classified records had been turned over”
How’d that work out?
Oh, right, Trump still had 100+ docs.
Trump, Barr, Durham, and others successfully chilled the FBI’s willingness to investigate anything related to Trump.
The FBI handled Trump with unprecedented kid gloves, afraid to follow the facts for fear of political blowback, delaying the investigation for months.
“They also heard from top FBI officials that some agents were simply afraid”
You know what would go a long way to erasing that fear?
Leadership that protected agents from political blowback, allowing them to do their job.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
@richsignorelli@DeadlineWH@NicolleDWallace On June, 2022 - 5 months before Smith was appointed - attorney John Eastman and Jeff Clark’s phones were seized. Clark’s house was also searched.
@richsignorelli@DeadlineWH@NicolleDWallace Also in June, 2022 - 5 months before Smith was appointed - Nevada GOP chair Michael McDonald’s phone was seized, reportedly as part of the fake elector scheme. Subpoenas were also served on the Republican Party chairmen of Arizona and Georgia.
- four years of intimidation by Trump
- Barr’s constant focus on left-wing violence in 2020 and
- the fact Jan 6 participants were largely conservative white men
The former President of the United States - and current front runner for the Republican presidential nomination in 2024 - posted this on social media this morning.
While everyone's looking at George Devolder-Santos, it's worth looking at him - especially his wealth and fundraising questions - from a counterintelligence perspective. From the "many times during [his] career" he claims to have visited Moscow,
1/
to the over $56,000 he received from Andrew Intrater, a cousin and money manager for sanctioned Russian oligarch Viktor Vekselberg,
to his statements about Ukraine, "if the Ukrainians really hated Russia so bad, the eastern border of Ukraine wouldn’t have welcomed Russians into their provinces…It’s not like Ukraine is a great democracy. It’s a totalitarian regime. They’re not a great bastion of freedom.”
3/
SCO thoughts:
- Mueller did not "start from scratch" - the investigations had been ongoing for 10 months, and already obtained hundreds of financial/communications records, conducted scores of interviews, consensual monitorings, and executed searches
- there was little delay - Mueller was appointed on May 17 and he and his leadership team were at FBIHQ getting briefed two days later
- existing agents/analysts largely transferred over to the SCO; identifying attorneys took a few weeks (work already done in current SCO cases)
- there was no discernible impact on the pace of the investigations; if anything, it greatly increased within a month
- space to house the SCO was identified within weeks (not sure where investigative teams are housed now, but I highly recommend bringing everyone under one roof)
“The amended complaint was, in its entirety, frivolous”
“The conduct was willful, not simply negligent…The choice of defendants, combined with the lack of any viable legal theories of liability, reflect an intention to injure rather than to redress legal harm.”