I think what many people still don't understand is that neither over nor under-regulation in such fine balances is without consequence and the damage done to cells, even if the switch is temporary, is a ticking time bomb in 9/10 cases! @Jikkyleaks
[WEF (sponsored by Rockefeller-Gates presented by H. Kissinger) service comment]
If you want to fight a biological war that you can control without unleashing an uncontrolled pandemic that could catch you out based on mutation rates: How would one go about it?
Let's unleash a
relatively harmless virus in various labs that first has the scientific community in a panic because of its new features, such as the GP120 (HKNNKS) and the FCS (QTNSPRRAR).
"SARS-CoV-2 spike protein S1 subunit shares low amino acid similarity with the gp120 protein, 7.3% amino
acid identity with gp120 of subtype A and 8.5% with subtype B, allowing us to test the specificity of the detected responses. Both gp120 of HIV-1 and S1 of SARS-CoV-2 can be cleaved off by furin and may participate in promoting cardiovascular pathologies (Suzuki, 2020;
Susan loves to be stupid and didn't even notice that the 14 das after are already such a big BIAS and fraud. Don't blame her. Susan follows "the science".
And the missclassifications of vacc. and unvacc. in the datasets which are common since this bullshit started won't
"If you want to mass produce a protein or DNA, you put it in a plasmid ring, along with "vectors" that make sure it gets produced first, and antibiotic resistance. Then you put everything into your working bacteria, which then diligently duplicate and work
off the plasmid rings with them. You add the resistance antibiotics so that everything that does not produce your plasmids dies. Standard, insulin is produced that way, no big deal.
If you only produce something like insulin, the cleaning afterwards is no big deal.