The #DisabilityRC has published their findings about people with an intellectual disability working in ADEs (supported employment) after the hearing last year.
They have also published the responses from the Australian Government, Bedford and National Disability Services (the peak for service providers). #DisabilityRC
Finding 1 is "it is open to the Royal Commission to find that for some people with disability their employment opportunities are limited to working in an ADE. The limited options mean there is no genuine choice and control in employment
opportunities." #DisabilityRC
Finding 2 is "it is open to the Royal Commission to find the payment of sub-minimum wages to people with disability who work in ADEs is not supported by any
meaningful justification in contemporary Australia and is a form of exploitation." #DisabilityRC
Greg Tucker and other disabled people told the #DisabilityRC about the impact of earning such low wages, as little as a few dollars an hour.
I wasn't going to say anything about the story in the Oz today, because honestly, I'm sick of saying the same things.
But this story, plus the 2GB stories this week, are part of a wider media narrative on the NDIS that isn't being challenged by ANYONE. And that's a problem. 🧵
We're in the lead up to the Federal Budget in May, when the raw cost of the NDIS will be a key feature. The new numbers will be part of all the discussion with no wider conversation about the economic contribution of the NDIS.
These stories are about shaping how that is talked about and what is focused on. They are the only stories about the NDIS, rather than stories about the findings of the Disability Royal Commission, for example.
Gee, imagine what the #DisabilityRC could have uncovered/found out/got justice for if it was even a quarter as effective as the #RobodebtRC has been in drilling down to who did what and why.
Worth asking some questions about why this has happened.
Three years, $500m budget, and we're heading into a hearing next week about 'inclusion', with no clue what the #DisabilityRC is going to do to STOP VIOLENCE against us, which was the whole damn point of it.
The #DisabilityRC has made no interim recommendations in those three years, so we have no idea what direction they are going in. They have been hostile to disabled people and disability organisations, and have insisted on 'both sidesing' core issues, like group homes.
[The ad is only on Facebook as far as I can see, and this is not a go at the disabled people in the ad, just to be very clear.]
The brief that came from the Disability COVID Comms working group was for comms that helped the wider community understand what COVID was like for so many of us, including as the public health rules changed. That is not what was delivered.
I'll tweet a bit from the #DisabilityRC today, with the first witness being @DrDebraKeenahan. Watch along on the DRC home page, and please feel free to mute the tag. It's going to be a lot.
Starting with the usual opening address from the Chair, outlining the scope of the hearing - public meaning both outside places, and online. #DisabilityRC
This hearing came from some of the responses to the Rights and Attitudes issues paper that heard about barriers caused from community attitudes, assumptions and biases. Yep. #DisabilityRC
This has happened to me over and over again, and happens to so many disabled people. Listen in to disabled people telling their stories about abuse in public and online at the #DisabilityRC this week.
Sam Millard, President of Short Statured People of Australia: "It's just as simple as words, people taking photos and sharing them through social media, or physical acts of either aggression. But it puts people in significantly unsafe situations." #DisabilityRC
People with an intellectual disability are called the R-word, and other slurs while out in public and online. #DisabilityRC