2/ You can't become your own bank even if you want.
The experience of using a crypto wallet or web3 application has always been so painful. More than 15% supply of bitcoin has been lost because people forgot their private keys.
3/ Web3 User Onboarding Experience Sucks
Web3 Onboarding Involves 4 Steps:
- Setting up wallet
- Saving Seed Phrases
- Sending funds to wallet
- Connect wallet to Web3
New users take 15-30 mins to figure out these steps.
4/ What is Account Abstraction
"Account Abstraction" is a confusing word, lets call it "Smart wallets".
Smart wallets are designed to do specific things by providing a great user experience.
The new ERC-4337 standard on Ethereum will make this possible.
5/ How ERC-4337 Works?
There are three participants involve in an account abstraction process.
Smart wallet signs Tx, Bundlers include them in Mempool, They pas Gas fees from their end, and Paymaster compensate them.
6/ Benefits of Smart Wallets
- No need of seed pharses, You can open a new wallet using fingerscan/QR Code/Face Scan in 30 sec.
- You could setup 2FA for your wallet
- You could setup daily spending limits
- You could enable monthly auto payment using crypto for subscriptions.
7/ Seamless Gaming Experience
Smart wallets are designed for Web3 Games, You could set a session keys, and auto approve number of transactions which will improve the overall gameplay experience of web3 games.
8/ You could Recover your Account
If you lose your phone than you can recover your wallet using social and commercial recovery services. It's almost like recovering your PIN/Password of Net Banking Account.
9/ Technical Implementation
EVM Compatible Chains can now take advantage of smart accounts include Polygon, Optimism, Arbitrum, BSC, Avalanche and Gnosis Chain.
L2s Like ZKSync and Starknet are using Modified version of ERC-4337
Both these wallets have implemented some of the features of ERC-4337. Try to make a new account on Argent on your phone, you will see the difference. It's the best mobile wallet on both security, and user experience wise.
It might change your life in both positive and negative ways.
The positive aspect would be where the bull cycle helps you climb a few steps toward financial freedom in the shortest possible time.
The negative aspect would be where the bull cycle drags you below the poverty line within a few months after it ends.
Most of us who've experienced a complete bull and bear cycle are well aware of how a bull cycle could actually drag you below the poverty line, even when you were in a position to achieve financial freedom.
But you thought, "Let me climb two more steps, then I'll stop." However, the cycle had other plans and changed direction while you kept waiting — and are still waiting, becoming mentally exhausted, toxic, and poor.
Sky/MakerDAO rebrand ended up confusing more people than exciting them.
Here are some of my thoughts on the @SkyEcosystem launch, and what you can expect from $MKR and $SKY
🧵
MakerDAO is one of the Top 3 Crypto Projects by Earnings.
They've done around $125M in revenue so far this year, showing 66% growth compared to last year, and their operating income for this year is $43.42M, which is 3x higher than AAVE.
MakerDAO founder @RuneKek proposed a 5-phase detailed plan for MakerDAO, which includes details around SubDAO formation structure, building a censorship-resistant treasury, trimming down RWA exposure over time, using AI in governance, launching a new chain with a new stablecoin and governance token, while not discontinuing MKR and DAI.
The bull cycle—how long will we stay in this cycle?
Is it really going to be a supercycle, as they say?
Or is it just another narrative to trap you?
Let's find out 🧵
Let me break some myths around the supercycle first.
We had only one supercycle in the past, which happened between 2016-17 when Bitcoin went from $232 to $20K in 24 months.
The super cycle started when btc reclaimed previous bull cycle support which was around $446 in may'16, length was somewhere around 19 months.
And some of the altcoins of that time, like $XRP and $LTC, also pulled some massive gains for investors during that period.
Based on historical data, we could expect the length of a supercycle to be more than 19 months to start with, and then it could extend as long as we get incoming liquidity in the market from new money.
In this short thread, we will quickly compare three key players in the DeFi lending space: Aave, Morpho, and Fluid.
Each comes with its own unique strengths and features.
Let’s break them down 🧵
1/ Aave
@aave is undoubtedly the most established lending protocol, known for its robust platform, wide range of supported assets, and other innovative features like e-Mode, flash loans, and credit delegation.
Aave's liquidity pools and somewhat stable interest rates make it a go-to choice for many users. Recent integrations with multiple L2s also position it as a versatile platform for cross-chain activity.
SUI is claiming to build the fastest blockchain network using DAG architecture, which could bring down the latency below 390ms.
Solana is already achieving latency around 500-600ms, and after the Firedancer launch, they could bring it down even further.
So, I really doubt the longevity of this narrative, but it is very much hyped up as of now.
2/ Usage Side Data
SUI is all about Wave Wallet, and Wave Wallet is all about Telegram bots and games.
Telegram games are getting spammed with millions of users these days, like Hamster Combat, which has 30 million users. So, you could consider it a great move by SUI in the context of future user adoption.
1/ AI researchers forming a DAO to build next-gen AI models on specific sectors would become one of the positive use cases for crypto AI in the near future.
2/ I'm more inclined towards the success of AI models designed for specific industries than general-purpose models.
We could see the rise of AI appchains which serve as a foundational layer for app-specific AI models.