Trump envoy James Jeffrey bragged that US sanctions "crushed" Syria's economy, while @Andrewtabler noted that US sanctions "exacerbated fuel and food shortages for everyday Syrians." #FraudSquad
A top ally says that "by early 2021, Zelensky believed that negotiations wouldn’t work and that Ukraine would need to retake" the rebel Donbas regions "'either through a political or military path.'"
This explains why Zelensky refused talks and escalated shelling in early 2022.
In covering Syria, US state media follows a strict protocol: no mention of CIA dirty war -- one of most expensive in history -- to arm sectarian death squads. And only passing mention of crippling US sanctions.
@declanwalsh A key protocol for US state media is to sanitize the US military occupation of Syria. So 900 US troops just happen to "remain", "chasing the remnants of the Islamic State."
Another key protocol is to sanitize crippling US sanctions. So to @declanwalsh, "the Syrian economy has nose-dived, strained by chronic food and fuel shortages." No mention of sanctions.
US officials are more honest: they brag that sanctions have "crushed" Syria's economy.
"Collusion" fanatics insisted that Mueller's full report be released. Their loss: it was a dud, because the Trump-Russia conspiracy theory was a scam.
Now that Durham is scrutinizing FBI misconduct in that probe, @neal_katyal suggests that Durham's report
"need not be public."
I fully understand why political and media professionals who peddled the dumbest conspiracy theory of all time -- that Trump was a Russian asset and that Mueller would prove it -- would not want the findings of an investigation into that conspiracy theory made public.
.@neal_katyal's argument is based on a Jan. 26 NYT piece that declared that Durham has "failed" -- even though Durham's findings have yet to be released.
If Durham indeed failed, why be afraid of having his report released for the public to judge? I'll have more on this soon.
I've tried to stay out of spats that don't involve me directly but this hit piece by @WalkerBragman on @jimmy_dore is too pathetic to ignore. Walker provides no evidence, just relies on the resentment of bitter TYT liars & faults Jimmy for enforcing standard contract provisions.
JD is faulted for binding workers to respect his privacy via non-disclosure agreements, which bar "discussing anything they learned about Dore, his wife, or their collaborators on the job including details about their business, personal lives, finances, investments, and more."😱
Non-disclosure agreements are pretty standard. Does Jimmy not have the right to privacy?
He does. That's why a TYT producer even has to admit that this provision "lines up with the kind of person who... wants to protect themselves." 😱
Bitter that @CJR published a massive expose of US media's humiliating Russiagate coverage, @BylineTimes has published a hit piece on @TheNation magazine's Russiagate coverage written by @dcampbell_iptv. Apparently CJR declined to run Duncan's piece two years ago.
@CJR@BylineTimes@thenation@dcampbell_iptv Article features Nation contributors complaining that the mag dared question Russiagate. Aside from the fact that this skepticism was vindicated -- did Mueller find that conspiracy? -- there's also the fact that The Nation published many writers who parroted Russiagate.
So the idea The Nation imposed an editorial line is just ridiculous. Because it fosters genuine debate, The Nation published a number of writers who bought into conspiracy theory that the president was a Russian asset and that Robert Mueller was going to prove it: