I thought it was time to do a thread on a useful paper for once. This 🧵 will give an overview of the main arguments against the #IHRADefinition presented in this paper. 1/13
First briefly the definition and the history of how the definition and specifically the examples came about. The 11 examples are NOT a part of the definition and were also not agreed upon by the IHRA Plenary but were published anyway due to pressure from pro-🇮🇱 groups. 2/13
This is the reason why seven of the eleven examples relate to Israel and not “to antisemitism that relates to Jews anywhere in the world”. 3/13
The examples as presented by the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance below. Examples relating to Israel marked in blue. 4/13
The paper shows how the examples are used for political purposes by organisations such as Campaign Against Antisemitism. Also, see Tweet 11 of this thread for more examples and uses of the definition. 5/13
It also provides a case study of a blatantly fraudulent use of the IHRA Definition by Luke Akehurst (not an MP) who has manipulated the IHRA document for political purposes. 6/13
3This section shows the meaninglessness of the Hasbara talking point of double standards or which the IHRA examples discusses as “criticism of Israel similar to that leveled against any other country cannot be regarded as antisemitic”. 7/13
This is a section and deserves being pointed out specifically on the issue of 'singling out Israel'.
"people are entitled to focus more attention on human rights problems where their own governments have a particular historical responsibility" 8/13
On the issue of “Israel [as] a racist endeavour” the argument is pretty simple and it is hard to deny that Israel is in fact a racist endeavour. 9/13
While this section on denying self-determination is correct, it leaves out the crucial point that self-determination does not mean a right to a state and especially not a right to an ethnostate. This is why a 1SS is not contrary to self-determination principles. 10/13
The last two sections of the paper are worth reading in its entirety (open access link at the end of thread). The penultimate section is a very useful discussion and resource of the political uses of the definition. 11/13
Followed by a discussion of alternative definitions of antisemitism and the usefulness or not of institutionalised definitions in general. 12/13
It is important that we counter Israel propaganda not only on here but also on an institutional level and this means dismantling the tools that are used to spread it such as the IHRA Definition. 13/13
Ich habe mir mal diese Reportage genauer angeschaut und wie erwartet hat sich die @ZappMM Reportage über verlorenes Vertrauen deutscher Medien selbst bewiesen, dass dieser Vertrauensverlust sehr berechtigt ist. Anschnallen, los gehts!
🧵1/
Schon der Beginn der Reportage macht klar, dass es hier überhaupt nicht darum geht zu recherchieren, ob deutsche Medien seit dem 7/10 einen pro-Israel bias haben, denn es gäbe darüber keine Untersuchungen. Es gibt diese Studien jedoch für den Zeitraum davor. Siehe auch @goldi 2/
Die erste Erklärung wieso ein großer Teil der dt. Bevölkerung der dt. Presse nicht vertraut ist laut ARD Chefredakteur eine Frage der Polarisierung, also nicht das Problem der Presse. Kritische Fragen bleiben aus. 3/
Every now and then I come across these sort of posts in the replies to Zionist organisations or individuals and thought I address why this is wrong from a purely analytical perspective:
1/10
One of the core components of Naziism was Antisemitism and hate of anything that could not be classified as Aryan. This aspect alone means that Israeli regimes cannot by definition be Nazis. 2/10
This does not mean that Israeli regimes or policies cannot be fascist in nature. Israel's current government has members which proudly describe themselves as fascists. 3/10
Das Kapitel fängt damit an den 3D Test wieder zu geben, aber ohne je eine Definition für die drei Ds zu liefern. Darauf folgt eine korrekte Wiedergabe der BDS Positionen. So weit, so schlecht. 2/12
PS: "Desinvestment" ist kein Wort Entweder Divestment oder Desinvestition.
Von Anfang an wird die Motivation für BDS nicht in der materiellen Realität der brutalen, völkerrechtswidrigen Besatzung Palästinas gesucht, sondern im Antisemitismus. Wer sofort AS sieht braucht andere Optionen garnicht erst beleuchten, praktisch. 3/12
A critique of Euan Philipps article 'The Palestinian Flag as a Tool of Oppression' in the Journal of Contemporary Antisemitism.
A Thread 🧵 1/x
As the abstract sets out, the aim of this paper is to 'assess' the antisemitic signifier that is the Palestinian flag. What is striking, is the almost complete lack of discussions on flags as signifiers of meaning bar one reference about the St George Cross.
2/x
In general, of the 50 sources used in this paper only three are of academic nature and two of those three are from the same author. This raises the question what is the academic basis for this assessment? What are the reference points against which meaning is assessed? 3/x