OnlyDans Profile picture
Mar 5 14 tweets 5 min read
I thought it was time to do a thread on a useful paper for once. This 🧵 will give an overview of the main arguments against the #IHRADefinition presented in this paper. 1/13 Image
First briefly the definition and the history of how the definition and specifically the examples came about. The 11 examples are NOT a part of the definition and were also not agreed upon by the IHRA Plenary but were published anyway due to pressure from pro-🇮🇱 groups. 2/13 ImageImage
This is the reason why seven of the eleven examples relate to Israel and not “to antisemitism that relates to Jews anywhere in the world”. 3/13 Image
The examples as presented by the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance below. Examples relating to Israel marked in blue. 4/13 Image
The paper shows how the examples are used for political purposes by organisations such as Campaign Against Antisemitism. Also, see Tweet 11 of this thread for more examples and uses of the definition. 5/13 Image
It also provides a case study of a blatantly fraudulent use of the IHRA Definition by Luke Akehurst (not an MP) who has manipulated the IHRA document for political purposes. 6/13 Image
3This section shows the meaninglessness of the Hasbara talking point of double standards or which the IHRA examples discusses as “criticism of Israel similar to that leveled against any other country cannot be regarded as antisemitic”. 7/13 Image
This is a section and deserves being pointed out specifically on the issue of 'singling out Israel'.

"people are entitled to focus more attention on human rights problems where their own governments have a particular historical responsibility" 8/13 Image
On the issue of “Israel [as] a racist endeavour” the argument is pretty simple and it is hard to deny that Israel is in fact a racist endeavour. 9/13 Image
While this section on denying self-determination is correct, it leaves out the crucial point that self-determination does not mean a right to a state and especially not a right to an ethnostate. This is why a 1SS is not contrary to self-determination principles. 10/13 Image
The last two sections of the paper are worth reading in its entirety (open access link at the end of thread). The penultimate section is a very useful discussion and resource of the political uses of the definition. 11/13 Image
Followed by a discussion of alternative definitions of antisemitism and the usefulness or not of institutionalised definitions in general. 12/13 Image
It is important that we counter Israel propaganda not only on here but also on an institutional level and this means dismantling the tools that are used to spread it such as the IHRA Definition. 13/13

You can find the article in its entirety here:
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/P…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with OnlyDans

OnlyDans Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @DanWei55

Feb 3
Every now and then I come across these sort of posts in the replies to Zionist organisations or individuals and thought I address why this is wrong from a purely analytical perspective:
1/10 Image
One of the core components of Naziism was Antisemitism and hate of anything that could not be classified as Aryan. This aspect alone means that Israeli regimes cannot by definition be Nazis. 2/10
This does not mean that Israeli regimes or policies cannot be fascist in nature. Israel's current government has members which proudly describe themselves as fascists. 3/10
Read 11 tweets
Feb 2
Ok, kurzer Thread 🧵über Kapitel 8 in @jutta_ditfurth Propagandawerk "Haltung und Widerstand, eine epische Schlacht um Werte und Weltbilder" 1/12
Das Kapitel fängt damit an den 3D Test wieder zu geben, aber ohne je eine Definition für die drei Ds zu liefern. Darauf folgt eine korrekte Wiedergabe der BDS Positionen. So weit, so schlecht. 2/12

PS: "Desinvestment" ist kein Wort Entweder Divestment oder Desinvestition. Image
Von Anfang an wird die Motivation für BDS nicht in der materiellen Realität der brutalen, völkerrechtswidrigen Besatzung Palästinas gesucht, sondern im Antisemitismus. Wer sofort AS sieht braucht andere Optionen garnicht erst beleuchten, praktisch. 3/12 Image
Read 12 tweets
Jan 10
A critique of Euan Philipps article 'The Palestinian Flag as a Tool of Oppression' in the Journal of Contemporary Antisemitism.
A Thread 🧵 1/x
As the abstract sets out, the aim of this paper is to 'assess' the antisemitic signifier that is the Palestinian flag. What is striking, is the almost complete lack of discussions on flags as signifiers of meaning bar one reference about the St George Cross.
2/x
In general, of the 50 sources used in this paper only three are of academic nature and two of those three are from the same author. This raises the question what is the academic basis for this assessment? What are the reference points against which meaning is assessed?
3/x
Read 17 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(