Teaching year 10 higher attainers last week.
Solving 2x + 2 > 8 (or something), and G writes 2x = 6, x = 3.
Me: "That's not right mate. x isn't equal to 3. What does that sign in the question mean? What is it?"
G: "It's a crocodile."
I slam my hand on the desk and everyone stops working. G laughs as I walk to the front with a smile on my face to write the question on the board.
Me: "V, what is this?" *gesturing at the >*
V: "..."
Me: "...and don't say crocodile. That made me cross before."
C, under her breath: "Crocodile".
V: "..."
To help, I enrol an assistant, W.
"W, show me the number 5 on the board."
W: *writes the numeral 5*
Me: "Nope!"
Quickly, W draws 5 dots.
Me: "Yes! This a number, but the '5' is a numeral to represent the number."
I draw the image on the board.
"Tell me about these two numbers"
Class: "They're equal"
So I join the top two dots, and the bottom two dots.
Me: "Ooh, look, an equals sign!"
Me: "So, what about these?"
Class: "They're not equal".
I join the tops, and bottoms, and show the inequality forming: <.
"So we write 3 < 5"
Me: "What about these?"
I join the tops and bottoms, and form the > inequality.
"So we write 5 > 2"
Me: "They're called inequalities, not crocodiles."
The three symbols are three states of comparison between two numbers"
> = <
Me: "What if I used 53 and 31? Am I going to use dots?"
Class: "No! That'd take too long!"
Me: "I'm gonna draw lines, to represent 53 and 31 dots. I know the line for 53 will be longer."
We can see the >.
53 > 31.
Me: "They are absolutely not crocodiles, and they're not hungry, and they don't eat the biggest number."
M: "I didn't know all that Sir, and that's really interesting." (It sounded more sincere than it reads...)
I then did some work with Eliza, my 5-year-old, over the weekend.
Comparing numbers using symbols from Stage 2 of the Complete Maths curriculum.
Drawing dots, drawing the inequalities, choosing the correct symbol. Then going to lines. Then fading those out.
She did really well, and I didn't even need to mention a crocodile.
Teach kids the right maths. Year 8 calculating using numbers in standard form because they're 13 is not the way. I recently took on a class who, when dividing numbers in standard form, couldn't divide 7 by 2 (6.1, apparently). Get prerequisites nailed before you move them on.
Don't expect classroom teachers to back-fill knowledge. The curriculum should adapt to the needs of learners, rather than requiring eight members of staff to think on their feet, with varying degrees of expertise.
Know pupils' names. Greet them by name with a smile, no matter how badly their last lesson went.
Say Hi on the corridors, and be approachable.
We're on the same team.
Have a seating plan, that YOU've set. It helps with maintaining order, and it helps with learning names. Have a copy inside a plastic wallet to annotate any rewards and warnings, and so on. If it's not working, explain that you're changing it, and why.
Since 2017 I've thought a lot about curriculum. In my sixteen years in the classroom, I've followed schemes of learning based on textbooks, from exam boards and 'for our kids'.
Most of them (most... the one which had Pythagoras before squares and roots stands out) had a decent sequence for learning mathematics. The problem was that they never seemed to get the job done.
The problem was, almost always, the scheme played out in the same way for every child. It wasn't the journey that had been mapped out, but the implementation of the journey.
I think that my least favourite thing in the maths work room is when someone doesn't put the whole ream of paper in the photocopier.
My second least favourite thing is when someone says USE MINI WHITEBOARDS without giving any further instruction.
A long(ish) thread 🧵...
I can think of a few uses of mini whiteboards which are sub-optimal, such as:
- using them as plates
- using them as a 'steel chair' and whacking your mate over the head
- using them to doodle
- using them instead of an exercise book
The power of the mini whiteboard, in terms of its utility and efficiency, is unparalleled. This isn't because students can rub out any incorrect workings and it lowers anxiety because the work isn't permanent - I actually feel that this goes in the 'cons' column.
I thought that the OCR Higher Maths P4 yesterday was nice and accessible, whilst being suitably challenging for the more able pupils.
Here are a couple of notable absences that I'll be directing my 11s to over the next few weeks.
Laws of Indices
HCF and LCM
Reverse Percentages
Completing the Square
Volume of Pyramids, Cones and Spheres
Error Intervals and Calculations
Right-angled Trigonometry
Area and Volume in Similar Shapes
Scatter Diagrams
Recurring Decimals and Fractions
Algebraic Proof
Histograms
🧵BACKWARD FADING: For me, THE key role of BF worked examples in lessons is to develop problem solving strategies in pupils. Generic problem solving strategies aren't necessarily helpful, and a lot of domain-specific knowledge is needed.
Let's look at what this looks like...
A novel idea is introduced to pupils after checking prereq. knowledge is good-to-go. The idea is shared in full, and understanding checked with mini-whiteboards. This will take a few goes - me, them, then me, then them, to the point that pupils can replicate the new idea in full.
Pupils begin to develop fluency in the novel idea become fluent. Expertise grows. The idea is no longer novel, and learning from example-problem pairs is losing impact. Me, them, me, them is having less of an impact than when they were novice.