Incapable of describing a wannabe fascist without scolding the group he’s targeting, absolutely incredible.
Another difference is that the left-wing maximalist stance is held by no one except activists you made up whereas the right-wing maximalist stance is currently being codified into law in numerous states. nymag.com/intelligencer/…
He can’t stop writing about this issue and refuses to stop stepping on rakes. Transphobia’s ability to break brains is unmatched
The wildest thing is that all these "reasonable concerns" are based on nothing! Five years of panicked articles haven't produced a single confirmed case of a kid being rushed into gender-affirming surgery. We're in razorblades-in-apples territory.
If you have 30 minutes free and are interested in the basic facts of this issue we made a condensed version of our trans-panic episode podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/the…
a) I don't think it's silly to ask for evidence of the central claim of an article.
b) these are not remotely evidence of the "left-wing maximalist stance" lol
As usual Jesse has zeroed in on a series of technical discrepancies without providing any explanation of why they're relevant to his case.
A single parent being a "trans activist" doesn't negate the fact that numerous families contradict Reed's account and 0 confirm it.
As for the other front office worker, it's not clear to me that she's ever claimed to have medical expertise. All she's said is that Reed acted unprofessionally. Her qualifications don't call that into question.
Jesse pulling the classic Greenwald move of presenting banal, already-established facts as if they're new revelations.
His own screengrabs show that the staffer wasn't medical personnel and never claimed to be.
He is defending the account of a front office staffer claiming to have medical knowledge by pointing out that another front office staffer didn't have medical knowledge.
Reminder: What's at issue here is the firsthand account of a gender clinic staffer who is making implausible, unsubstantiated claims.
Rather than substantiate them, Jesse is working on questioning the credibility of people criticizing her account.
We've been doing this for 30 years. Even if you think some of the new terms are silly — and some of them are — it's embarrassing for the nation's prestige media to dedicate this much time to pushing back.
If you don't want to say them, don't say them. But quit whining.
What's worse: Changing your mind on a social issue — or leaking private correspondence because someone disagrees with you? Hmmm I'll have to puzzle over this one for a few days.
Jesse's entire recent career rests on the premise that thousands of children are getting hormones and surgeries because they were bewitched by pro-trans Tumblr posts but he cannot imagine a middle-aged woman reading anti-trans media and believing it.
Right-wing media is *awash* in tall tales of kids peeing in litter boxes and getting hormones on a whim. Jesse's own work has reinforced this myth.
A clinic staffer finding these stories and fitting reality to her biases seems pretty plausible to me!
Reed's affidavit is full of right-wing tropes. At one point she says trans suicide rates are exaggerated.
This is common messaging in anti-trans advocacy — and one to which Jesse has contributed.
Jon is going to pretend he didn't endorse this wildly implausible "whistleblower" but his article presented her claims in detail and strongly implied that they were true. nymag.com/intelligencer/…
Everyone with even a passing familiarity with the academic research and right-wing messaging on this issue told him it was irresponsible to take her allegations at face value. He dismissed those empirical concerns in favor of some baffling debate-club thought experiment.
Jon is lying. The entire premise of his piece was that "activists" refused to acknowledge real problems in transition care — but there's no evidence of these problems aside from sketchy anecdotes like Reed's! This is the core of the "debate"!