And this reporting of the new video releases should be combined with the fact that DOJ demanded protective orders over all videos disclosed to the defendants from CCTV or body worn cameras, preventing release of those videos to the public.
The videos could only be released if they were used in court.
So who used them in court? The Govt when it asks for defendants to be detained without bond, or other various types of pretrial proceedings.
So who used them in court? The Govt when it asks for defendants to be detained without bond, or other various types of pretrial proceedings.
So DOJ could pick and choose what it wanted the public to see and what would be reported in the press. That allowed DOJ to set the "narrative" through the media about what happened on Jan 6, while defendants couldn't release any video to establish a counter-narrative.
This is why what Carlson is doing is so important. For the first time the wider public is seeing that the events of Jan 6 were a lot more nuanced that has been suggested by the GOVT -- including the Jan 6 Committee.
The GOVT has misled the public.
THAT should make you unhappy.
The GOVT has misled the public.
THAT should make you unhappy.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
