H.P. Lovecraft transformed the horror genre, wrote 100,000+ letters to frens, and was, above all, a soulful aristocrat. Let's explore his attacks on democracy, his critique of our modern priorities, and what he believed civilization MUST aim at👇🏻
1/ A great society is only built when the most gifted contribute
And for their contribution, the aristocrats must be rewarded:
“Since the only human motive is a craving for supremacy, we can expect nothing in the way of achievement unless achievement be rewarded by supremacy”
2/ Civilization must create valuable “thoughts and objects” and aristocracy “alone” can do this
Democracies live “parasitically on the aristocracies they overthrow”
And over time, democracies use up “the aesthetic and intellectual resources which autocracy bequeathed them”
3/ Science & art trickle down from the top:
The ultrawealthy turn their surplus capital & attention toward the “full appreciation of beauty and truth”
“Most of the pleasures” felt by the average man wouldn’t exist if the wealthy didnt use their spare resources to cultural ends
4/ No aristocracy is permanently protected from democracy; no democracy is permanently protected from ambitious aristocrats
The masses eventually over run the palace
And then the aristocrats eventually take advantage of the indifferent, scatter-brained masses to win power back
5/ Lovecraft gives all governments a very simple task:
“Government need go no further than to safeguard an aristocratic class in its opulence and dignity so that it may be left free to create the ornaments of life and to attract the ambition of others who seek to rise to it”
6/ Aristocracies can’t be closed off:
“The healthiest aristocracy is the most elastic – willing to beckon & receive all men of whatever antecedents who prove themselves aesthetically & intellectually fitted for membership”
Make the aspirational life available to the deserving
7/ HP Lovecraft is spiritually opposed to the democratic reformer, the man who is obsessed with the “welfare of the masses,” who embraces their “mental-emotional point of view” & who’d “willingly sacrifice the finest fruits of civilization for the sake of stuffing their bellies”
8/ Highly evolved humans need great art, noble adventures, and the right to a sincere search for truth. These needs are only satisfied under the aristocratic conditions of wealth, luxury, high artistic & moral standards, generational missions, and protection from everyday fads
9/ Lovecraft on the difference between him and a democratic reformer:
“The reformer cares only for the masses, but may make concessions to the civilization. I care only for the civilization, but may make concessions to the masses. Do you not see the antipodal difference?”
10/ I love HP Lovecraft’s definition of art
The artist sees something important, good, or beautiful in the world - something invisible to others
Then he sets to work, using the mediums he’s best acquainted with, to bring his vision to the world
Full quote from a letter:
11/ How H.P. Lovecraft tried to balance his artistic and scientific sides
Lovecraft had a sensitive heart and a sharp mind
Here's how he balanced the two:
12/ Civilization should be set up for the production of beauty & greatness: “We advocate the preservation of conditions favorable to the growth of beautiful things — imposing palaces, beautiful cities, elegant literature, reposeful art & music, & a physically select human type”
Arm yourself against democracy's psyops
Here's my Reading List For Aristocrats:
• Emerson on why you need great men
• Nietzsche on what is greatness
• Carlyle's demand for a Superman
• Never took a bath
• Never lost a fight
• Wrote one of Joe Rogan's all-time favorite books:
The Book of Five Rings (1645)
The book is 380 years old but its wisdom still holds up. A thread:
1/ Miyamoto Musashi was undefeated across 61 duels. An all-time record. He never married, never had children, and according to rumors, never combed his hair. He was a strange but profoundly wise man. Rogan says his book is "one of the most valuable things anyone has ever written"
2/ Have no favorite weapon. Musashi cautions fighters against over-reliance on one move or "special fondness for a particular weapon"
He writes: "Too much is the same as not enough"
Stay pragmatic, dont entertain "likes and dislikes," arm yourself with what you need for victory
Hot take: too much humility is a sin. Sometimes you need to over-estimate your abilities so you take bigger leaps. The humble take negative feedback seriously and fold; the arrogant maintain a bull-headed stubbornness in the face of repeat failures. Guess who ultimately wins
Schopenhauer: "For what is modesty but hypocritical humility, by means of which...a man seeks to beg pardon for his excellences from those who have none? Whoever attributes no merit to himself because he really has none is not modest, but merely honest.”
John Fowles explains in "The Aristos" (1964) how high IQ can subvert your will to act: "High intelligence leads to multiplicity of interest and a sharpened capacity to foresee the consequences of any action. Will is lost in a labyrinth of hypothesis." Rule 1: Do not lose the will
Carlyle in 1841: "A man lives by believing something; not by debating and arguing about many things."
Chesterton on how an open mind is no more a virtue than an open mouth: "The object of opening the mind, as of opening the mouth, is to shut it again on something solid”
A knight who owns a sharp sword should make sure he does not cut himself with it, and a man gifted with a great mind should make sure he does not start living inside it...
It's the best mental model for understanding how political change ACTUALLY happens
A thread...
1/ Overton was a libertarian political scientist. In the 1990s, while raising funds for rightwing thinktank Mackinac Center, he kept meeting donors who didn't understand what thinktanks actually do. He coined a new concept to solve this problem: Window of Political Possibilities
2/ Overton argued that politicians are not leaders but followers
Since they want to get re-elected, they'll only turn those proposals into policy which already have some public appeal
A totally unpopular idea? Political suicide. Outside the "window of political possibilities"
1/ People are reaching sexual maturity sooner than ever before while having kids later than ever before. Puberty has significantly moved up and parenthood has significantly moved down—creating a gulf of meaningless hookups in-between.
2/ The internet has exposed you to more people than ever before, thereby significantly increasing your odds of meeting “the one” in theory. But you’re more alone than ever before.
3/ You need to be a stable and fully healed person before you can enter a relationship—but actual intimacy only happens by navigating instability and pain together.