THREAD. One of the biggest political scandals of our time is coming to a head today. Democratic leaders just announced they will vote with the far-right to overturn a democratically passed DC law. The story is important, and full of weird lies.
Background: DC passed modest changes to modernize its criminal code and promote safety. Changes would still leave DC an outlier across the world in severity of sentences, more than any country. DC cages people more than any state, and Black people 19 times rate of white people.
It is a scientific consensus that more human caging makes people less safe. It literally reduces total U.S. life expectancy by 2 years *for every one of us.* If more caging made us safe, U.S. would be safest place in world. It's not--U.S. is violent.
Moreover, data shows that crime rates in DC are at historic lows. Despite daily fearmongering news stories, crime in DC hasn't been lower in at least 40 years, and likely longer. The curation of anecdote in the media has created unhinged misinformation.
In this context, right-wingers (and now Biden and Schumer) have seized on modest reductions in maximum authorized sentences for carjacking. This is total nonsense, and actually based on a huge lie: carjacking sentences won't go down in practice! slate.com/news-and-polit…
Today, we learned that Schumer (and many Democratic senators) will join Biden in an inexplicable, shameful, historic push to overturn the will of DC voters, who have no political representation in the Senate, all based on right-wing lies.
This followed relentless and absolutely bonkers levels of misinformation and outright lying in the establishment DC media:
Thus, all of this DC criminal code debate is based on three crucial lies: 1) lies about what the new code does, 2) lies about crime rates, 3) and lies about longer sentences reducing violent crime.
Here's the crucial point: I have been studying the rise of fascism around the world and this kind of adopting of misinformation and appeasement of fascists is how fascism comes to power.
Those who actually care about safety and who devote our lives to it--as opposed to pundits pushing more human caging in the greatest caging bureaucracy in history--know that the evidence shows that safety results from investment in things like health, housing, education, etc.
And these material improvements are popular politics for Democrats! But when they play into Republican lies and adopt their logic, they will always lose because if people are afraid in this way, they will always choose the genuine autocrat over the weak, unprincipled pretender.
Fascism is never beaten by accepting its lies and appeasing its zealots. That only makes them stronger, as history has sadly taught us. Pathetic, and historic haplessness from Democrats .
The political significance of this development is enormous, not just for DC statehood. Biden's move--and support of Dem establishment--is attempt to signal end of contemporary "criminal justice reform" moment. Both parties now have unhinged state repression as their strategy.
Responses like this from Dems are common. Some people are incapable of processing critique of Dems. No one is saying there is "no difference" btw liberals and fascists. And many Democrats have difficulty understanding how boosting police is devastating for reproductive rights.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
All people of good will must know the history of body cameras. Why did Democrats, consultant, and pundits push them as "police reform"? The truth is quite dark.
I set out the shameful history of Democratic Party propaganda about body cameras in my 2024 study called The Body Camera: The Language of Our Dreams. campuspress.yale.edu/yjll/volume-4/…
For those in other places where liberals and the multi-billion dollar surveillance industry is pushing this "reform," my article was translated into French and published as a book. As always with everything I write, the royalties are donated to charity. ruedorion.ca/la-camera-dint…
THREAD. This can be a big educational moment for progressive people who don't work in or study the punishment bureaucracy. Having spent 20 years in it--and just publishing a book on exactly this topic--I can say that reality works in the opposite way that Jamelle assumes:
Rhetoric about stuff like "training" has, time and again, in dozens of contexts I studied, had the opposite effect on the approach of liberals to addressing the violence, lawlessness, and ineffectiveness of the punishment bureaucracy.
It's quite similar to the Democratic party and liberal punditry's approach to body cameras, which I wrote about at length last year: . "Training" rhetoric is an even more stark example of effective counterinsurgency propaganda.campuspress.yale.edu/yjll/volume-4/…
THREAD. Every year, I tell the story of Ezell Gilbert. It's the story of one of the most remarkable cases in U.S. history, and you’ve probably never heard of it. The story of what the U.S. government did to him is vital for understanding the current moment we are in.
In 1997, Ezell Gilbert was sentenced to more than 24 years in federal prison in a crack cocaine case. Because of mandatory sentencing (treating crack 100 times as severely as powder), he was put in a cage for a quarter century, and even the judge said this was too harsh.
At sentencing, Gilbert noticed an error that increased his sentence by about *10 years* based on a misclassification of a prior conviction. In 1999, without a lawyer, he filed a petition complaining about the mistake. The Clinton DOJ opposed him, and a court ruled against him.
THREAD. Did you know that at about 1/3 of all stranger homicides in the U.S. are perpetrated by police? But there's something hidden here that is important to understand in this authoritarian moment.
First the basics: The vast bulk of physical and sexual violence in our society is *not* perpetrated by strangers, but by people who know each other. Obscuring this fact is a critical feature of copaganda in the news. People are shocked to hear it. Why?
A simple answer is that the news makes people extremely scared of strangers--the person next to you at CVS, the person walking down the street, the unhoused person in a tent, the anonymous burglar, etc. These are the kinds of crimes associated with surveillance, policing, etc.
THREAD. In Trump's speech to an unprecedented gathering of generals, he announced he was preparing to order them to use U.S. "cities as training grounds for our military." I want to highlight a few other bone chilling statements and put them into context that media obscures.
First, although it didn't get as much coverage, Trump also said the U.S. is facing "a war from within" against "the enemy from within." This essentially declared to military leaders--who Hegseth had just essentially told he would be purging of disloyalty--a new civil war.
Second, Trump specifically added that this "war" was something the "people in this room" (i.e. military generals) would "straighten out" in domestic deployments to cities run by Democrats "one by one." He added: "inner cities" are "a big part of war now. It’s a big part of war."
THREAD. I happened to be in Portland yesterday to give a university lecture as Trump called it “war ravaged Portland” while illegally ordering the deployment of the U.S. military to use “full force.”
This kind of outrageous misinformation would not be possible without the culture of fear spread for years by the mainstream media. He is playing on the prodigious ignorance and irrational fear cultivated by the way the news media distorts our sense of safety.
Portland, needless to say, is nothing remotely like what Trump describes. But the mass media has created an entirely delusional public perception of what threats we face and from whom.