In Feb 2020 I had strong suspicions that Covid was lab engineered. By the end of April the scientific evidence I had was *overwhelmingly* on the side of lab origin. #Fauci and #collins had that data by the end of January. They lied, people died. The facts matter.
Here was my first big public romp through the lab origin data back on May 4th, 2020.
/3 Somehow, the whole "lab origin" thing became a matter of politics. If you were on the left, you believed and wrote anti-scientific "zero evidence" crap like @NPR did:
/4
This speaks to the power of the psyops that were being run. My conclusion is that it was far more effective on those who (falsely) considered themselves to be intellectually enlightened. What a cruel irony. They turned out to be the most susceptible to brainwashing.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Fauci committed perjury by claiming he doubted he ever met Ralph Baric, the man most responsible for chimeric coronavirus research, GoF funded by the NIH/NIAID, and the main author of the paper that Fauci freaked out about On Feb 1 (see next Tweet).
/2
We're supposed to believe that Fauci "doesn't recall" meeting with Baric on Feb 18th, 2020 after sending out this urgent email to his second in command about a Ralph Baric/Shi paper on Feb 1, 2020:
I won't be here much over the next two days...My annual Year In Preview Seminar (virtual, online) is starting in an hour. Two full days of meeting people in our side halls and listening to @BretWeinstein@PierreKory@DavidBCollum@stkirsch and many more.
The main point? Help you get focussed and prepared for the year(s) ahead. What will happen with oil prices? How will Ukraine and our eroding Saudi relationships impact the dollar? What if a distant relative shows up on your doorstep in a time of crisis needing help?
And, of course, the main predicament will be discussed. Namely:
1/3 The really infuriating part (by which I mean civilly if not criminally actionable) is that the FDA was onto this and other serious adverse events no later than July of 2021 (see next tween below).
2/3 - Despite the seriousness of this, the FDA did not warn anybody, nor change any provider labels. And they did nothing at all for 16 torturous months while they slow-boated the study of this data (see next).
3/3 November 2022(!!) the FDA finally decided to put these exceptionally important findings out on a pre-print. No word on why so long, and no word on whether they thought to also check in the under 65 cohorts.
/2
The reaction from the "rapid response" teams encountering a HIGH IMPACT vaccine reputational crisis requiring a PHASE 2 response has been both swift and entirely substance free. @ArisKatzourakis
/3
By "completely unfounded," we assume that @ArisKatzourakis means we have to entirely discount more than 1,000 papers in scientific journals describing a wide range of serious vaccine-induced side effects. This one from @US_FDAmedrxiv.org/content/10.110…