Ed Whelan Profile picture
Mar 10, 2023 10 tweets 4 min read Read on X
With the acquiescence of @StanfordLaw administrators, Stanford law students yesterday shouted down Fifth Circuit judge Stuart Kyle Duncan at a scheduled event on topic of “The Fifth Circuit in Conversation with the Supreme Court: Covid, Guns, and Twitter." 1/
@StanfordLaw In email before event, Stanford DEI dean Tirien Steinbach stated support of right of students to protest event, "in keeping with University policies ... against disrupting speakers."

All good. Except she and 4 other administrators at event allowed gross disruption. 2/
@StanfordLaw Steinbach in fact fanned the flames, both in her email and at the event. Her email quoted with evident approval an absurd summary of Duncan's record. And in remarks at event, she said Duncan "literally denies the humanity of people" and told him "your work has caused harm." 3/ Image
@StanfordLaw After drowning out made it impossible for Judge Duncan to proceed, Steinbach delivered prepared remarks that berated Duncan and sided with protestors: "your advocacy, your opinions from the bench, land as absolute disenfranchisement of their rights." 4/
@StanfordLaw Steinbach stated Stanford's policy on free speech even as she repeatedly called it into question. So Stanford has DEI administrator who won't support Stanford's policies on free speech and who made only token effort to stop gross disruption. 5/
@StanfordLaw From what I hear, Stanford law culture is as bad as Yale's, perhaps even worse. Lefty students are viciously abusive of Federalist Society student leaders. A few years ago, a federal judge was spat on. 6/
@StanfordLaw Stanford, I'm told, filmed the entire event. So let's see if it makes the video public soon, and let's see if there are any consequences, especially for DEI dean Steinbach, for violation of university policies. 7/
Here's video of Stanford DEI dean Steinbach's remarks slamming Judge Duncan and setting forth university policy on free speech while calling its soundness into question and stating that it might need to be reconsidered. /8

vimeo.com/806801455/16c7…
Not that it matters under free-speech principles or Stanford's stated policy, but protestors had no objection to Judge Duncan's topic. With support of DEI dean, these emotionally pampered crybullies instead claimed that his presence on campus made them feel unsafe. 9/
Given how ACLU has abandoned its commitment to free speech, it's perhaps not surprising that DEI dean Steinbach's previous position was chief program officer at ACLU of Northern California. 10/

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Ed Whelan

Ed Whelan Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @EdWhelanEPPC

Jan 17
In a gross act of constitutional defiance, Biden is about to announce that he regards the ERA as having been lawfully ratified.
Never mind that his own Department of Justice, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, and just about everyone else has recognized otherwise.
Biden is citing Virginia's purported ratification of ERA on January 27, 2020--a year before he became president. Why has he waited until now to make his declaration? Because he knows that it's outrageously wrong.
Read 8 tweets
Jan 15
Supreme Court hears oral argument today in Free Speech Coalition v. Paxton. Issue is whether age-verification law for pornography websites violates First Amendment. As WSJ explains in house editorial today, Court should rule that law is permissible. 1/
I hope to cover today's oral argument (which starts at 10 a.m.) in tweet thread. Here's a piece by my @EPPCdc colleague @ClareMorellEPPC that outlines issues. 2/claremorell.substack.com/p/what-to-expe…
@EPPCdc @ClareMorellEPPC In this @firstthingsmag essay, @ClareMorellEPPC and @WBLittlejohn explain how parents are "losing the arms race against Big Tech and Big Porn."
3/firstthings.com/article/2025/0…
Read 50 tweets
Dec 12, 2024
In my new Confirmation Tales post, I explore the history of recess appointments of federal judges. I found the results of my research more interesting than I expected, and I hope you will too. 1/
Did you know that some 300 federal judges, including a dozen or so Supreme Court justices (the precise number is contested), have been recess-appointed? Are you curious to learn who was the only recess-appointed justice not to be subsequently confirmed? (Hint: He was a chief justice.) Did you know that Earl Warren delayed the conference vote on Brown v. Board of Education for three months until he had shed his status as a recess appointee? 3/
Read 5 tweets
Dec 4, 2024
I'll do a thread on oral argument today in U.S. v. Skrmetti. Begins at 10 a.m. ET, will probably run past noon.
BTW, when Chief invites Chase Strangio to present oral argument, he will surely refer to Strangio as "Mr." No one on either side should make big deal of this, as Court practice allows advocates to select honorific.
Starting very soon: Thread on oral argument in Skrmetti
Read 46 tweets
Nov 25, 2024
From today's ruling by Missouri court in Noe v. Parson: "The evidence at trial showed severe disagreement as to whether adolescent gender dysphoria drug and surgical treatment was ethical at all...."
More from today's ruling by Missouri court in Noe v. Parson: "the credible evidence shows that a vast majority of children who are diagnosed with gender dysphoria outgrow the condition."
Read 4 tweets
Nov 13, 2024
Hope it's wrong, but I'm hearing through the grapevine about this bonkers plan: Trump would adjourn both Houses of Congress under Article II, section 3, and then recess-appoint his Cabinet.
As predicate for Trump's exercise of adjournment power, one House of Congress would seek other House's consent to adjourn and be denied. So Speaker of House would need to be complicit in evisceration of Senate's advice-and-consent role.
House Speaker Mike Johnson needs to say NO to this right away.
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(