Adopting the meaningless Leftist slur of "Neo-Liberal" to describe highly regulated Keynesian welfare states with Cultural Bolshevik characteristics was one of the biggest makes of the modern Right-Wing.
The actual definition of Neo-Liberalism is "new Classical Liberalism." Modern Western economies are heavily regulated (more than ever before in America) and mixed with all sorts of Socialist policies; welfare, redistribution, private-public partnerships, etc. That's not CL.
Modern usage of the term Neo-Liberal came from Leftist academics in the 1990s. This study of journal articles found that the term is almost never defined and used to describe such a wide range of things that it is basically meaningless: link.springer.com/article/10.100…
Forgot to explain why: "Neo-Liberalism" to a Leftist means "Pinochet Thatcher Reagan destroying the welfare state with evil Mont Pelerin Society Libertarianism" which has obviously not happened and is obviously not an accurate description of Globalism.
By using this term, you are validating the Leftist myth that the Right is in power and that they are the plucky rebels fighting against THE MAN. They use this trick to control the Overton window. Similar to calling Stalin a "Fascist."
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
J. D. Rockefeller is cited as the original Monopoly Man who destroyed society for profit.
He was a devout Christian who was told by a preacher to become rich and dedicate his life to philanthropy. He genuinely loved Blacks, invested in their community, visited their churches...
His wife was an abolitionist whose parents were part of the Underground Railroad.
He spent millions on philanthropy and founded the Rockefeller Foundation when he realized that he wouldn't live long enough to donate his entire wealth.
He was motivated by ideology, not profit.
I've researched the political views of all Gilded Age "Robber Barons." It was a pretty even three-way ideological split between those who were "apolitical" (i.e. just went along with dominant Right-Wing ideology of the era), explicitly Right-Wing, and explicitly Left-Wing.
Certified WE WUZ moment: "Out of Africa FAKE, Out of China REAL!"
He's misrepresenting the data of course. OoA migrations were explained in this 2022 genetic study that cross-referenced archaeological finds: academic.oup.com/gbe/article/14…
Eurasians initially diverged from Sub-Saharans ~50-100kya (probably 100kya) and lived in a "hub" that could've existed anywhere from North Africa to the Middle East.
The KhoiSan people of South Africa diverged from other humans 150kya (possibly as early as 260kya).
Eurasians genetically diverged in the "hub" and migrated into Eurasia via multiple waves.
The first Eurasians to settle West and East Eurasia (the "Initial Upper Paleolithic" wave represented by samples dated 45kya) were more closely related to modern East Asians than Europeans.
The transition to meat eating increased pathogen pressure and the use of pharmacological plants by humans: "there is evidence of medicinal plant use by hominins in the middle Paleolithic" onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/aj…
Here's where it gets interesting: Compare this world map of infectious diseases to this amateur world map of spicy foods. Not a 1:1 correlation but pretty close.
This is the attempted libtard debunking from 2021:
"Spice and traffic accidents Mean spice use is related to poor health outcomes that are not attributable to infection, such as road traffic fatalities per 100,000 population"
Leftists claim that Right-Wingers are driven by "fear" (fear of change, of "the other," etc.).
RWers probably have better threat detection abilities on a neurological level (simulating brain damage makes people more Left-Wing) but this idea was debunked by a recent study...
It found that being RW has nothing to do with "fear." The defining characteristic of the Right-Wing worldview is the belief that hierarchy (or inequality) is good and natural (vs the Leftist belief that it is "unfair," "unearned," or "arbitrary").
The other key RW characteristic is having high disgust sensitivity. A person's L or RW political alignment can be prediced with almost 100% accuracy from brain readings after showing them just one disugsting image.
America was founded as an explicitly White nationalist country and this was only undone ~50 years ago by Communists and other Globalists via the so-called "Civil Rights" Revolution.
You don't want Americanism, you just want to roll the clock back to late 20th Century Globalism.
Why does James Lindsay even oppose BLM, CRT, etc.? They're just the Current Year version of MLK (who he loves).
Well, obviously he just opposes them because they're bad optics and ruining his cozy Globalist society. If James Lindsay was really serious about opposing "wokeness", he would be railing against the so-called "Civil Rights" laws that set wokeness in stone.
The watertight argument to use against Ashkenazi "muh IQ" stuff is that there are far more high IQ Whites in America alone than there are high IQ Ashkenazis on the face of the earth. So obviously their overrepresentation is not due to high IQ alone.
Plus, certain White ethnic groups, or subethnic groups, have IQ on par with Ashkenazis. IIRC this includes people like Episcopalians and northern Italians.