Thread by @jaywillis

Look, if you think Kyle Duncan is the "adult" in this exchange with a Stanford Law student, let alone a guy sincerely trying to have a civil dialogue with people with whom he disagrees, and definitely not trying to just get blurbed on Fox News primteime,🤷‍♂️

Here’s Dean Tierien Steinbach, whom Kyle Duncan demanded that Stanford *fire* after this event (and for whom @StanfordLaw formally apologized today), telling Duncan that he is “absolutely welcome” to speak, regardless of the content, and that the admin won’t censor him

Again, listen to this man Kyle Duncan legit shout at the woman who asked him a question, pretend not to understand it, and then deliver a mock-rant about how judges don’t consider “fairness” as part of their work, and tell me he’s the persecuted victim here lmao

I know this might seem impossible, but again, Stanford Law administrators apologized *to* this guy Kyle Duncan today, and not to the students whom Duncan called “appalling idiots” lol

https://twitter.com/chrisgeidner/status/1634791941350064128

My is not that Stanford Law students were not rude to Kyle Duncan or whatever. My point is that Kyle Duncan gave at least as good as he got, and that people like Ed Whelan trying to retcon this as some cautionary tale about out-of-control woke law schools are dishonest grifters