BREAKING: DOJ just filed its objection to using damning comms found on FBI spreadsheet related to Proud Boys trial

Not only does DOJ want Judge Kelly to preclude further cross ex of FBI agent, DOJ wants his previous cross ex struck from the record.

Unbelievable Image
DOJ deleted 80 rows of FBI comms it quickly determined were "classified."

We will probably never know what was deleted. Image
On Thursday, AUSA Ballantine suggested numerous times the destroyed evidence could constitute "classified" material. Now DOJ insists it's evidence from a closed case.

This requires a HUGE leap of faith that DOJ is telling the truth---which this DOJ does not deserve. Image
LOL wut Image
Her

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Julie Kelly 🇺🇸

Julie Kelly 🇺🇸 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @julie_kelly2

Mar 13
Expect fireworks today in Proud Boys trial as DOJ and defense argue over contents of hidden portions of an FBI spreadsheet and cross-ex of FBI agent who produced the document.

Late last night, Nick Smith, atty for Nordean,
filed his response to DOJs demand to limit cross-ex: Image
DOJ gave a really lame excuse as to why agents discussed doctoring a CHS (FBI informant) report.

Here's the exchange retrieved from hidden messages: Image
A+ for creative legalese by DOJ, gotta say.

Still trying to figure this one out... Image
Read 5 tweets
Mar 12
Since the dirty "spill" by DOJ/FBI at Proud Boys trial is of massive interest (my original tweet on what happened now has 3 million views), I thought I'd post more info here.

As scandal unfolded in court, Judge Kelly wondered why defense didn't notify DOJ beforehand 😂
What did defense catch DOJ/FBI doing? Here's a brief summary--someone on government side hid thousands of rows of required comms produced by FBI case agent that contained explosive information.

Shockingly, FBI surveilled atty-client emails then apparently informed prosecutors.
A federal prosecutor claims "everyone knows" email systems in prison are monitored so the 6A doesn't apply or something.
Read 5 tweets
Mar 11
Breaking down latest video by @EpochJoe64 on death of Rosanne Boyland.

Protesters bring her lifeless body to police at tunnel. “This is the woman you killed!”
They drag her face up, feet first into the building and try to revive her…
Cops try to use shock pads to start her heart. She has no pulse
Read 6 tweets
Mar 11
UPDATES on this: Just amazing this tweet has 2.2 million views. Despite lack of coverage in "conservative" media, the public is very interested in the grotesque machinations at the Proud Boys trial.

On Wednesday, Judge Tim Kelly SUSPENDED the jury trial as defense started to...
question an FBI agent as to why she hid thousands of messages related to the case (or at least comms with other FBI agents.)

One concealed message discussed doctoring a CHS (informant) report. One discussed an FBI supervisor telling an agent to destroy evidence.

Judge Kelly... ImageImage
abruptly dismissed the jury when it was clear defense was about to expose the agent for possibly hiding, doctoring, and deleting evidence.

Oh, she also snooped on comms btw a defendant and his lawyer then appeared to pass that info to prosecutors. Image
Read 8 tweets
Mar 10
Free Jacob Chansley

This is on you Judge Royce Lamberth (Reagan appointee)

And Merrick Garland @DOJPH

And Asst US Atty Kim Paschall

And Albert Watkins (his attorney)

And the news media.
Judge Lamberth July 2021 denying Jacob's release
This is a discovery update in Jacob's case filed in September 2021. Jacob had been incarcerated for 9 months and DOJ admitted they still didn't have basic discovery re surveillance video uploaded and available to defense
Read 4 tweets
Mar 10
DOJs “shock and awe” Jan 6 campaign was more like “arrest first, evidence later.”

Reposting a few articles from 2021 that covered how DOJ delayed building its discovery platform — and judges were not happy. But their inaction to do anything emboldened DOJ amgreatness.com/2021/08/13/the…
Judge in July 2021: “This does not feel what the Constitution [and] the Speedy Trial Act envisions.”

DOJ had asked for another trial delay because full discovery wouldn’t be available until early 2022—a year after this particular defendant was arrested.

amgreatness.com/2021/07/30/unp…
Notice the date on this tweet.

Anyone who suggests J6 defendants had full access to evidence—incl surveillance video especially 1st year of prosecution—is lying.

Again—the judges are ultimately responsible for this ongoing travesty.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(