I'm just now discovering that last summer #mattydickpics called for Hillary to be banned from Twitter because he misrepresented the Sussmann trial and misrepresented the entirety of the Russian investigation.
Just last summer, #mattydickpics was so stupid that he didn't understand that when people steal files via cloud computing, it leaves traces in many different servers. (He has changed that view now that he's Elmo's chief pet, but is too stupid to realize he has.)
This is classic "Russiagate" propaganda, making the provably false claim that the claims of Trump ties to RU all came from the dossier and Alfa Bank.
As all "Russiagate" propagandists do, #mattydickpics left out details about contacts with Russians that Trump and others were lying about, starting with Mike Flynn.
Remember #mattydickpics is writing about the Sussmann trial, which proved that FBI fucked up the investigation into the anomalous communications. And yet he takes DOJ IG's conclusion, not the one shown at Sussmann's trial.
This is also makebelieve from "Russiagate" propagandist #mattydickpics. Papadopoulos pled guilty to hiding when he got advance notice of the hack and leak AND refused to explain his notes about a back channel meeting w/Russia he was planning for September 2016.
Here, #mattydickpics argues that bc the disinfo in the dossier distracted from Konstantin Kilimnik's role in the 2016 election until an investigation disclosed it is proof that there's no there there.
"Russiagate" logic for you.
Anyway, I hope #mattydickpics is asked to testify again, because this little Substack -- in which he called for Twitter censorship bc he's so stupid he spread stupid RU propaganda that undermines his current claims -- should have been entire focus of Dem questioning last week.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Also, she claims there has been little judicial scrutiny of this, ignoring the 4 precedents and Hunter Biden's similar challenge rejected by 2 Trump appointees.
1) We've talked about little but Biden's age since January. Yet certain hacks with a gripe claim they were the only one telling that secret that led all the news.
2) CREDIBLE stories -- that is, the ones that quote people on the record and/or very specifically described people anon, rather than just inventing a conspiracy retroactively based on feels -- all describe a decline since January, and more in recent months.
3) MANY of the people posing as journalists appear not to understand there are two questions: Does he drop from the race, does he drop from the presidency.
Given that the more detailed reports are about STAMINA and speaking (not dementia), those are different things.
Aileen Cannon is doing her best to prevent a trial before the election, but by all means make sure we get more pictures like this one (my annotations). This box had the most sensitive docs found.
DOJ reiterates their assertion that the cover sheets in the famous photo, AND close to 50 empty cover folders, were in the blue leatherbound box when they found it.
Let's correct the false claims here. 1) Egypt National Bank convinced Beryl Howell they complied with this subpoena -- it's unclear how the Chinese records resolved. 2) Mueller didn't tank this investigation. After a long subpoena fight, he handed it over to DCUSAO.
3) That's precisely the same thing he did with Roger Stone investigation: After year-long subpoena delay, he handed over still ongoing investigation into whether Stone conspired w/RU on CFAA. 4) We know what happened to Stone investigation: Barr killed it, Trump killed it more.
5) We don't know, for sure, what happened to suspected Egyptian funding (via way of China??) investigation; it was killed in same weeks when Barr was killing most of the rest of Mueller. It's possible that refusal to subpoena Trump Org killed it.
There was an iPhone--one central to the gun case against Hunter--saved ONLY in iTunes (not iCloud), and protected by a password. Ziegler admits he accessed it -- lots of journos have relied on him doing so. Q is whether doing so was accessing Hunter's data.
It'll be an interesting legal case (Ziegler is arguing that bc Hunter never owned the hard drive on which he, Ziegler, obtained the PWD-protected iPhone content, it is not Hunter's data). But it'll be still more interesting discovery.