I'm just now discovering that last summer #mattydickpics called for Hillary to be banned from Twitter because he misrepresented the Sussmann trial and misrepresented the entirety of the Russian investigation.
Just last summer, #mattydickpics was so stupid that he didn't understand that when people steal files via cloud computing, it leaves traces in many different servers. (He has changed that view now that he's Elmo's chief pet, but is too stupid to realize he has.)
This is classic "Russiagate" propaganda, making the provably false claim that the claims of Trump ties to RU all came from the dossier and Alfa Bank.
As all "Russiagate" propagandists do, #mattydickpics left out details about contacts with Russians that Trump and others were lying about, starting with Mike Flynn.
Remember #mattydickpics is writing about the Sussmann trial, which proved that FBI fucked up the investigation into the anomalous communications. And yet he takes DOJ IG's conclusion, not the one shown at Sussmann's trial.
This is also makebelieve from "Russiagate" propagandist #mattydickpics. Papadopoulos pled guilty to hiding when he got advance notice of the hack and leak AND refused to explain his notes about a back channel meeting w/Russia he was planning for September 2016.
Here, #mattydickpics argues that bc the disinfo in the dossier distracted from Konstantin Kilimnik's role in the 2016 election until an investigation disclosed it is proof that there's no there there.
"Russiagate" logic for you.
Anyway, I hope #mattydickpics is asked to testify again, because this little Substack -- in which he called for Twitter censorship bc he's so stupid he spread stupid RU propaganda that undermines his current claims -- should have been entire focus of Dem questioning last week.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Nice to start cataloging the people, like @MaryMargOlohan, who are stupid enough to take @SecRubio's false claims about what the EU fine is for seriously.
Thanks for making that clear!
Big Dick Toilet Salesman says he is stupid or a liar.
Unsurprising that Medicare fraudster @SenRickScott thinks fines for fraudulent consumer claims are censorship.
To add the confusion of the many ways Lindsey the Insurance Lawyer bolloxed her attempt to indict Jim Comey, there are actually THREE different documents.
First, what she purports is an indictment (but which was not presented to GJ in this form). Sig page looks like this.
The sig page for the doc originally docketed as the no-bill indictment looks like this (identical to what I just posted). Basically, Lindsey put the sig page from the purported indictment on the no-billed one.
Sometime later that day, someone FIXED that (the no-billed indictment) with a correct last page.
Let me try to explain how John Durham made you MAGAts all look like dumbasses.
By context, this email of 2 Russian spies talking about starting a Deep State conspiracy is July 26.
But this Russian spy report--the one you're all drooling over? Durham has, AFAIK, ALWAYS hidden the date of that. Always. 🤔 @ChuckGrassley is probably colluding with him to do so now.
But BY CONTENT, it can only have been written July 26 or later.
@ChuckGrassley Now, Durham concluded that the Bernardo emails were "compilations," which is a dodge word for "fabrication." But even if you believe the Bernardo emails are REAL, the one via which the Russian spies would have "learned" that Hillary "approved" a smear campaign was date July 27.
In a declaration filed this week, Trump's top DOGE at Treasury cited a GAO report from last year. Lots of people On Here are taking that $2.7T out of context. (And ignoring that poor Tom miscited some quotes in this paragraph, but we expect shoddy work from DOGE.)
But let's look at the GAO Report he relies on, shall we?
FIRST humiliating thing DOGE Tom didn't tell anyone is that MANY of these improper payments--the reason there was a recent spike--pertain to Trump's own COVID programs.