Thread by @luceleftred1

Is it even ethical to be discussing amendments to the GRA, knowing it blatantly renders women politically powerless and is the antithesis of child-safeguarding? Those drafting the act knew it would affect women’s sex-based rights: from sex-discrimination/equality law, privacy…1

…political/proportional representation to safeguarding. The effects of sex-falsification on official documents that enables child-safeguarding violations, are indefensible.
Is it a level of moral bankruptcy to attempt to mitigate and compromise on a piece of legislation…2.

…clearly incongruent to the human rights of half the planet? Embedding the concept of ‘legal/acquired’ sex will do little to reinstate the biological reality of women and their right to exist as political beings with different needs to men. If this were a question of ethics…3.

…there would be no amendments - just an apology to women for putting the desires and wants of a small demographic of men above their own rights and needs, and an immediate repeal of the GRA. The real question is, what value do we attach to women and the safeguarding of…4.

…children? Society has shown itself to be misogynistic in the extreme. That surprises no woman. The real surprise is the complete negligence of care towards children and the destruction of all safeguards and boundaries. One thing is certain - the GRA is bad legislation…5.

…because the safeguarding of children should be paramount; aside from women’s sex-based rights. The PC of Gender Reassignment must be removed from the EA and we must #RepealTheGRA
That is the moral thing to do. 6.
petition.parliament.uk/petitions/6283…

@threadreaderapp unroll please.