Central banks, after blowing the inflation call, piled into rate hikes to save their credibility but neglected to assess the lag effects along the way and now some of these are blowing up in everybody’s face. Well done. Again.
The worst part in all this is that the lag effects are still filtering through and hence things will obviously still get worse on the growth front. But recessions happen fast once confidence is lost and confidence just took a crowbar to the face.
How will they restore confidence? I think this is the key question the Fed and ECB must be asking themselves right now. Do you want to risk blowing everything up to save face and lose even more face in the process?
Or do you do what’s right from a policy perspective, admit that you got blindsided (again) and try to do what’s necessary to keep things from blowing up and causing another major crisis and an immediate large scale recession?
From my perch they need to let go of their self perceived credibility issues and do what’s right. Before throwing more gasoline on the fire perhaps stop. Immediately and figure out the status of the blaze.
That means stop rate hikes and pause QT and backstop liquidity. Worry about inflation later. Inflation is already coming down and the events of the past week into today are likely to kill it off anyways.
A recession will do that, every time. But you can’t risk a systemic event which is front and center right now and nothing is more of a systemic risk then the financial sector freezing up.
Moodys downgraded the entire US banking sector to negative yesterday. This is not an environment to raise rates into. Even Volcker knew that and not only did he stop raising rates he cut them.
But Powell is no Volcker. Volcker was good at central banking and as the evidence over the years keeps mounting that Powell is not. Blunder after blunder. Creating fires and then chasing them. Sad.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
So they hiked themselves right into a banking crisis while peddling a soft landing narrative forcing them to intervene before they even got to a pause.
Once again the Fed has shown itself to be utterly oblivious to the risks right under its nose.
The incompetence is stunning.
And now everything is a policy shambles with no visibility with historic bond volatility and nobody has a clue just after a week after Powell blabbered all hawkish causing yields to rise before the new crisis collapsed them.
But thanks for the hundreds of Fed speeches of policy misguidance again being utterly deaf, dumb and blind to reality as they were with transitory.
Some perspectives on the recent dramatic market developments.
For those who prefer the watch this on YouTube I posted the video there as well:
Incidentally, after Bear Sterns blew up during the same weekend in 2008 as SVB did in 2023 the S&P 500 rallied 14.5% from the lows that week before the hard landing.
Using this week's low for now as a reference an equivalent move would be 4360 on $SPX.
Not a prediction, but fyi.
Higher for longer. Right.
Banks already blowing up before they even got to their forecasted terminal rate.
At least in '07 banks didn't blow up until after.
You know there is a well established history of the Fed breaking things when they raise rates.
But it's always the timing.
Point is: Increasing the cost of carry from zero bound into the highest debt construct ever in record time has consequences & the collateral damage won't appear at first, but then suddenly cracks appear.
The soft/no landing narratives want to pretend these don't matter. They do.
Now: This can chug on for a while and even during the yield cure inversion result in big equity rallies in between, but it's ultimately the radical steeping after the un-inversion that the lag effects create the bigger cracks that lead to recession.
So we had to endure dozens of Fed speeches in the last month setting expectations for 25bp & now Jay just flipped it to 50bp.
What, exactly, was the point of these speeches but to again result in total misguidance as they did with transitory before?
Now Bullard will again come out and babble on how much credibility the Fed has.
Give me a break, this is a joke.
That's why I have been saying for a long time: You can't listen to these people, their forecasts and guidance have no predictive value whatsoever. It's total misguidance.
How can you be so wrong and still be in the job?
And yet they keep doing it.