“In many ways, both parties are still living in a world that has long since died—a world in which distributional conflicts can be suppressed through broad-based economic growth.”
@tribunemagazine “Even if either party had any desire to return to the post-war consensus, it is highly unlikely that in a world characterised by slowing productivity, financial instability and climate breakdown, it is even possible to grow our way out of the problem of distribution anymore.”
“In short, political choices have to be made. Winners and losers have to be chosen. And which side loses largely depends on who is the strongest—which is the real reason both parties will avoid any measures to strengthen the hand of workers.”
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
@tribunemagazine Here is a bank that grew rapidly as the result of a tech bubble inflated in part by the Federal Reserve, before being bailed out by the government during the financial crisis of 2008, only to return to growth in the second tech bubble inflated by the Fed…
@tribunemagazine …before investing in so much US government debt that its
depositors had to be bailed out by the US state when interest rates rose.
I only just saw this* - my initial point was about how it’s weird for socialists to tie themselves up in knots defending those who don’t share their views.
But I understand why some people think my upbringing invalidates my writing/commentary and I’m ok with them criticising me.
But I also think it’s ok for people who have been brought up with privilege - like myself - to take part in socialist struggle.
Some of my favourite socialists - notably Toby Benn - have been posh too (not that I’m saying I’m an aristocrat lol).
So yeah, I get why some people are mad at me!
But if your issue is ‘she takes up some of my space’ you should try reaching out - I’m actually quite nice IRL and try to use my platform to promote other voices (esp young socialist women) and cool campaigns when I can.
Seeing as this clip has resurfaced I thought I’d share some thoughts on how I might have handled it differently.
I was 25 at the time - only 3 years ago, but I’ve learned a lot about messaging and communication since then, both from practice and @NEON_UK training.
🧵This is probably a bit lame to post, but I was inspired by people sharing their stories, so here goes.
I never thought I’d be able to do either of these things - give up drinking or meditate every day - even though I always knew that I needed to just to feel ‘normal’.
I always knew my already poor mental health was being worsened by some of the things I was doing (and not doing) to my mind and body, but reasoned that others were in the same boat and they seemed to be coping.
My ADHD diagnosis was the trigger I needed to make some big changes.
I knew that drugs wouldn’t fix everything, and could make my anxiety worse, so I figured I would start by changing the things in my power.
As well as daily meditation, I started going to the gym, journaling, sleeping more - and this gave me the foundation to go sober.
Finally got the chance to read @profitratedown’s Smart Machines and Service Work - a really enjoyable read and one of the most important new books in Marxist political economy I’ve read in a while.
Quick thread 🧵
@profitratedown His central thesis is that the rich worlds productivity problem can be explained by the growing proportion of labour power devoted to ‘unproductive’ (in Marxist terms) supervisory or circulatory activities.
@profitratedown The fact that this isn’t being picked up by mainstream economists is an (insoluble) problem of measurement - mainstream economics just can’t measure value and therefore productivity in the way that Marxists do - so they’ll keep chasing their tails trying to understand stagnation.
It's depressing that the opposition doesn't realise that by repeating your opponent's frame (nationalism, family values etc), you don't steal their votes, you just strengthen their narrative.
If voters go into the polling booth thinking 'Britain first' and they'll vote Tory.
"Too often, politicians and advocates craft and test for
language in order to please the greatest number of
people, no matter their ideology. This has left us, at best,
unable to fire up the people who we need to act as the
vanguards of change and, at worst, disempowers them."