First, apparently Area Substacker claims to believe that a press release invoking Chris Rufo, Claremont Institute’s Center for the American Way of Life, and repeating meaningless propaganda terms at least 14 times, all while claiming to care abt truth, is not propaganda.
Here's the link, btw. This is literally a "DEI is the one true truth" presser.
Next, the flack for DeSantis' Department of Education decided to get pissy about being told his sloppy propaganda is sloppy propaganda.
Thin-skinned and counterproductive to the traditional definition of the job, but perfectly in line with DeSantis' One Party state.
Then, Area Substacker, who is either following an obscure flack's Twitter account or who was spoon fed this, reacted by doubling down on the propaganda-per-word quotient.
I mean, first of all, it's Axios, not MSNBC or NYT.
There's nothing inherently Democratic about reacting badly to stupid propaganda, but in ASS' book, it's the obvious mark of a Democrat.
So ASS goes from objection to stupid propaganda to Democrat to @oneunderscore__.
Importantly, ASS, who claims to care about journalism, attacks someone for pushing back against stupid propaganda.
He suggests a very basic reaction to bullshit propaganda MUST be proof of partisanship.
Then, DeSantis' flack weighs in, acclaiming ASS' stupid attack turning a basic reaction to propaganda into a partisan thing.
Pushaw is ... not a friend of journalism.
Look her up.
It turns out that simply calling propaganda propaganda was too big a crime for DeSantis' flunkies.
I don't know whether ASS was himself delighting over the firing of a journalist for objecting to propaganda. BUT
BUT, first of all, the progression here went from one DeSantis flack bullying someone for calling out propaganda, to ASS applauding and bullying calling out propaganda, to another DeSantis flack applauding the bullying of someone calling out propaganda, with firing thrown in.
The idea here--& ASS is an instrumental part of this progression, in all senses of the term--is that people who call out sloppy propaganda must themselves be punished for doing so.
You must regurgitate Chris Rufo's ugly and stupid view of the world, or you will be punished.
Now, if you're one of ASS' groupies who still believe this man is engaged in civil liberties, take some time to think seriously about whether you want to be part of enabling a key engine of the bullying of those who object to stupid propaganda.
Otherwise you own the fascism.
ASS is part of a concerted effort, an effort that happens to include a bunch of angry men, like #MattyDickPics, who have spouted false claims about Russia, to punish those who call out disinformation.
This is a concerted effort to normalize an assault on rationality.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
@oneunderscore__ Since we're talking about ASS' almost maniacal obsession about @oneunderscore__, I just remembered that, at a time ASS was wailing that no one was writing abt Hunter Biden, Ben wrote about a report on him by someone under a fabricated identity.
Going thru the exhibits from trial of Vladislav Klyushin, who was convicted last month of hack-and trading. These two are of particular interest: They show Ivan [Y]Ermakov, the guy who did the hacking. He's also the guy who allegedly stole John Podesta's emails.
Prosecutors had so much fun w/pics of [Y]Ermakov & Klyushin, no doubt in part bc the latter (on the right in the selfie) had shitty OpSec & so stored all these photos in his iCloud, where the FBI could get them.
At trial, they introduced text of [Y]Ermakov telling his boss, Klyushin, to stop exposing their hack-and-trade operation, in that case on Threema texts he ALSO saved to his iCloud account.
The Guo detention letter--with descriptions of his caravan of luxury vehicles and fraud-funded armed guards--is even more interesting than the indictment.
The same article quotes Tim Parlatore complaining about DOJ going after lawyers, yet retroactively calling advice legal advice probably doesn't make you a lawyer.
"Absent any solid indication that Boris is a target here."
Like, maybe that they seized his phone?
Meanwhile, at least 17 of the 83 words in this one paragraph are pained euphemisms to hedge what Trump clearly did.
DOJ had already challenged witness' testimony, U Alabama's George Hawley, bc he doesn't know much abt Mackey (tho they said if he wants to distinguish that Mackey is alt-Right, not just conservative, then they will ask about the racism inherent to that). storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.usco…
Mackey suggests that @lukeobrien (whom he calls an SPLC researcher and not the journalist who first IDed Mackey) might commit "actionable wrongdoing" for writing a story.