Apparently, the characteristic of GR is defined below. It’s a sex ‘reassignment’ process that involves physiological or other aspects of sex change. This process can be started with a mere thought - I think, therefore, I am. Or with the physical mimicry of gender stereotypes. 1.
Gender itself, is not defined but we all know it to be imposed behaviour/expectations placed on both sexes. In effect, GR applies to those who believe/wish they are/were the opposite sex. It is a characteristic based on belief, not fact. S7 describes the manifestation of…2.
that belief in a physical and metaphysical manner. It conflates sex with gender without ever explaining gender. We are just to accept that ‘transsexuals’ are people who are capable of sex change/reassignment. If that is not considered a belief then it must be a blatant lie…3.
solely to aid the falsification of sex because sex reassignment is not possible. That is the true characteristic of S7. To deny ‘Transgenderism’ is anything but a belief, is a ‘red herring’. #RepealTheGRA and remove the PC of GR from the EA. 4.
‘Transgenderism’ seeks to unmoor us from the reality of our sexed bodies, which for women results in the complete denial of what the female body experiences and is subjected to with regards male violence. As @KnownHeretic states, ‘it preaches disassociation from primary sense…
awareness.’ Believe not what your eyes and instinct tells you. It’s an attack, not only on boundaries but on the female body itself. It allows for the complete commodification, colonisation, objectification and pornification of women. This is, of course, is nothing new with the…
exception that it is being sold back to us as a form of human liberation from material bondage. Oh, the irony. In truth it’s a liberation of a no holds barred society where every kind of fetish/paraphilia is brought out into the glorious sunshine. Hence, the mainstreaming…
Is it even ethical to be discussing amendments to the GRA, knowing it blatantly renders women politically powerless and is the antithesis of child-safeguarding? Those drafting the act knew it would affect women’s sex-based rights: from sex-discrimination/equality law, privacy…1
…political/proportional representation to safeguarding. The effects of sex-falsification on official documents that enables child-safeguarding violations, are indefensible.
Is it a level of moral bankruptcy to attempt to mitigate and compromise on a piece of legislation…2.
…clearly incongruent to the human rights of half the planet? Embedding the concept of ‘legal/acquired’ sex will do little to reinstate the biological reality of women and their right to exist as political beings with different needs to men. If this were a question of ethics…3.