A lot of people were shocked and dismayed when Governor DeSantis repeated Kremlin talking points about Ukraine, and declared that the US doesn't have a national interest there. Ron isn't dumb, and he served in the Navy.
"Moderate" (and I use the term very loosely) Republicans were appalled by this, and denounced it quickly. Something that Democrats and Republicans can still find common ground on is National Security. 2/n thehill.com/homenews/39022…
But, there's a VERY good reason he's probably doing this: it just takes war-gaming the situation out a bit and understanding the motivations of some of the key players.
First: DeSantis wants to be President, and will do whatever it takes. 3/n
He's not a nice or compassionate person: if a bunch of Ukrainians end up raped, enslaved, or dead, so be it. If Russia ends up in a great strategic position, it's worth it to save the US from "wokeism", abortion, and trans people (he is a true believer). 4/n
The other key player here is Vladimir Putin. Putin will do whatever it takes to stay in power, and that requires at least hanging on to the territory Russia has already taken. To do that, he needs to get the US to drop support for Ukraine, or even better, leave NATO. 5/n
Trump has already promised these things, and Tucker Carlson is one of the most popular TV personalities in Russia.
If the US withdraws support, Ukraine is screwed.
If the US stays the course, eventually our manufacturing capacity will overwhelm Russia. 6/n
Putin may view the survival of his regime as contingent on winning in Ukraine. The surest way to win is to induce the US to withdraw support. Thus, getting the US to withdraw support is seen in the long run as a matter of regime survival. 7/n
We know that Russian bots and trolls interfered in the 2016 elections. Since then, AI and manipulation has gotten better. Simultaneously, we've seen institutional capture of Twitter, TikTok, and FB by largely pro-Russian leadership. 8/n
Twitter in particular has hollowed out any capability to detect or defend against manipulation. Given how the platform is hemorrhaging money, they're also susceptible to taking money from less than forthright sources to do things that favor Russian activities. 9/n
With Putin seeing the 2024 election results as key to his regime's survival, and defenses down across a number of social media platforms, I expect Russia to go all-in on manipulating the 2024 election. 10/n
They will do the mental calculations and push the most electable pro-Russian candidate in the field.
I believe DeSantis is making these same calculations. He's very smart, very calculating.
Thus, DeSantis knows that he's not going to make great electoral gains by taking a pro-Russia position. His words aren't for his base or the US public.
They're for Russia. He's trying to head off Russian manipulation efforts to help Trump at his expense. 12/n
IOW, he wants to make sure that future Russian interference efforts aren't directed against him, and might even throw in behind him if they decide he's pro-Russian enough, and more electable than Trump.
He's looking for Putin's (very substantial) support. 13/n
It's cynical, Machiavellian, amoral, and completely like him. It's also a completely logical explanation for what we're seeing as he spouts nonsense about Ukraine (6% of the DoD budget is currently halving Russian capabilities every year) 14/n
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Under the US Constitution, all officers serve at the pleasure of the President. This allows him to (theoretically) fire everyone he thinks isn't loyal enough, and replace them with sycophants and loyalists.
Trump intends to do this. This would devastate the US military. 1/n
People don't realize how strong the ethos of political neutrality is among senior officers, or the respect for the rule of law. They recoil in horror at the idea of the military being used against US citizens, or as a political instrument.
There is historical precedent. 2/n
Before the Civil War, much of the Army was all about patronage, and the quality of US Generals to start the war was pretty uniformly bad.
Stalin's purges contributed to the collapse in '41 during Barbarossa. 3/n
I've been betting for a while that DeSantis was likely to get the GOP nomination due to support from the GOP donor base plus strong negatives with some Republican voters.
In my book, American Fascism, I described Trump as part K-Mart brand Mafia Don and part Borscht Belt insult comic.
Ron DeSantis' closest personality comparison is Lord Farequaad. 2/n
DeSantis is ~5'8" on a good day in a blood sport profession (politics) where being tall is a huge (pun intended) advantage. DeSantis counters with high heeled boots and (probably) lifts. That's how he ends up 6'1" in pictures. 3/n slate.com/news-and-polit…
Who do they want retribution against? The people who "ruined" "their" America
Who "ruined" America? The Woke Mob / Cultural Marxists
Who do they define as the most visible example of the things they hate? Trans people 1/n
Everything bad that happens is a result of "wokeness" (read: trans people).
Chaotic withdrawal of US forces from Afghanistan? Trans people
DoD missing military retention goals? Trans people
SVB bank failing? Trans people 2/n
In each case, they would argue that tolerance of trans people led to catastrophic failures. In their mind, the only way to save the country from more such failures is to no longer tolerate the existence of such people, and punish them for "ruining their country". 3/n
This represents a profound ignorance of what life is like as a trans person. There are no other trans people in my daily life. None of my coworkers, who are my most common contacts. Not on weekends, where I do my hobbies. 1/n
And online, trans is just a part of it. I would MUCH rather be talking about Suns basketball, military theory and technology, helicopters, ships, animation, husky rescues, etc.
ANYTHING but trans stuff. There's only ONE reason why I'm still discussing it a decade later. 2/n
Because Matt Walsh, Knowles, and the rest of the GOP has decided that my ability to function in public and hold a job should be eradicated. I live with the constant stress of wondering just how far they're going to go, because if they succeed, I have to leave the US. 3/n
This just passed. But my immediate question is: what happens when Texas makes it a felony to travel to New Mexico to access these services? Or invokes the Comstock ack Act to prevent ISPs and phone companies from allowing people in Texas to look up or call these orgs? 1/n
What happens when New Mexico responds with it's own sanctuary state laws to prevent extradition to Texas? Then Texas announces (or legislates) they won't prosecute or extradite "vigilantes" who "retrieve" (kidnap) women and trans people from New Mexico? 2/n
Because, we're already there. California is a sanctuary state for abortion already, but is doesn't border Texas. Florida has announced that it won't prosecute people who kidnap children to prevent them from receiving gender affirming care, or even the possibility of it. 3/n
There's been some discussion of what it means to eradicate trans people, and if this is even genocide.
I want people to understand what this means in practice, based purely on what's being proposed today by Republicans, and what it means for trans people. 1/n
Let's start with the kids. Teachers and other mandatory reporters cannot even mention trans people. They are, however, required to report any child suspected of being trans to their parents, and to the government to be put on some sort of list. 2/n
Youth are not only banned from receiving transition related care as teens, they are forbidden from socially transitioning by many of these laws. Only conversion therapy is permissible. Teachers and schools are forbidden from using their names or letting them use bathrooms. 3/n