It's not a "whataboutism" to say it's absurd to charge Putin with war crimes without charging Bush, it's a completely devastating argument against the claim being made. If the law doesn't apply to everyone, then it's not the law, it's just corruption. It's a tool of the powerful.
"Whataboutism" is just empire simp for "stop highlighting the fact that we spend all our time violating the rules we claim to enforce, because they're not really 'rules' but rather systems of global control".
So the link above is to Gumroad, which is the do-it-yourself option. If you don't feel like doing that, here's the order-from-Redbubble option: redbubble.com/people/caitoz/…
ATTENTION JOURNALISTS: It is never, ever acceptable, under any circumstances, to cite think tanks funded by governments and the military industrial complex as sources of information or expertise on matters of national security or foreign affairs.
This happens every single day, but just as an example take @crikey_news' shameful publication of bugus propaganda churned out by @ASPI_org, a think tank funded by the western war machine. As soon as you do this, you're guilty of journalistic malpractice.
@crikey_news@ASPI_org As soon as you find yourself writing anything like "According to my source from the Australian Strategic Policy Institute," you have ceased to function as a journalist and are now functioning as a propagandist. It's insane that this extremely obvious fact isn't better understood.
Front page of the Sunday Age accidentally does the meme. According to war secretary Marles, Australia is spending hundreds of billions of dollars to protect our trade with China... from China. twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
Australian natsec journalism is just becoming one uninterrupted stream of accidental internet memes.
Again, the only possible explanation for the completely irrational way that Australia is sacrificing its own economic and security interests by aiding in the US empire's encirclement of China is that Australia is more afraid of the US than of World War 3.
In September 2000 the influential Project for the New American Century published "Rebuilding America's Defenses", and it's amazing how its "findings" have become the mainstream establishment consensus since that time. All today's China/Russia stuff aligns with this, for example:
Many balked when the unipolarist values of neoconservatism led to the invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq after 9/11, but today it's widely accepted that the US must prevent the rise of a rival superpower — a value enshrined by PNAC's Paul Wolfowitz in the Wolfowitz Doctrine:
This dynamic was recently spotlighted by former Australian Prime Minister Paul Keating, who explained that all the warmongering we've been seeing toward China is the result of its becoming an economic superpower:
When you make a mistake, you make changes to ensure that mistake is not repeated. Nobody responsible for that invasion suffered any consequences of any kind, and zero policy changes were made. caitlinjohnstone.substack.com/p/stop-calling…
"If the invasion of Iraq was a mistake there would have been changes put in place to make sure nothing like it ever happens again. Those changes were never made because they thoroughly intend to do similar things in the future." soundcloud.com/going_rogue/st…
It’s not a "whataboutism" to say it’s absurd to charge Putin with war crimes without charging Bush, it’s a completely devastating argument against the claim being made. If the law doesn’t apply to everyone, then it’s not the law, it’s just corruption. caitlinjohnstone.com/2023/03/18/sto…
Stop calling the Iraq War a "mistake". When you make a mistake, you make changes to ensure you don't repeat that mistake. Nobody responsible for that invasion suffered any consequences of any kind, and the unipolarist ideology which led to it has become more entrenched than ever.
If the invasion of Iraq was a "mistake", western government officials would be residing in prison cells at The Hague, countless pundits and journalists would now be working behind cash registers in retail shops, and US foreign policy would have undergone a dramatic overhaul.
Instead the exact opposite has happened. The western officials who launched the Iraq War are esteemed members of elite society, the pundits and journalists who manufactured consent for it are at the top of their field, and US unipolar hegemony is the accepted status quo norm.