Share this page!

Maybe Scrolly?
ً Profile picture
Twitter logo
Mar 18 • 10 tweets • 6 min read
Someone asked me for a principal component analysis of the entire human species.

Left is from a study, right is a 3D PCA using these coordinates:
pastebin.com/DWWUjqVU
in this software (paste in "source"):
vahaduo.github.io/custompca/

Adding some more useful PCAs in this thread.
PCA of modern West Eurasians (not including North Africans).
PCA of selected ancient West Eurasians projected over the PCA of modern West Eurasians (again not including North Africans).
PCA of some modern Eurasian populations (no MENA) with selected ancient populations projected on top.

Useful for seeing variation among the "Eastern Non-Africans" (Amerindians, East Asians, Oceanians, etc.).
A global PCA with various ancient Eurasian populations. Useful because it debunks the myth that West European Hunter-Gatherers (WHG) were "Black/African."

From this study on Scythians:
nature.com/articles/ncomm…
PCA of modern Africans and West Eurasians focusing on genetic variation in Africa. South African Khoisan are as genetically distinct from West Africans as they are from Europeans.

Study: pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29545507/
PCA featuring some of the earliest Eurasian samples from the Paleolithic, which were less diverged than their modern descendants.

It also shows that Amerindians are very distinct from Europeans and East Asians.

Study: nature.com/articles/s4158…

See also: .
PCAs showing ancient and modern Eastern Non-Africans.

Study: nature.com/articles/s4158…
PCA of Ancient East Asians, Amerindians, and Europeans, plus the PCA of modern populations that they are projected on.

(Forgot the study source).
PCA of ancient and modern Siberians and Amerindians. I think the ancient samples are marked with a star but the PCA isn't very clearly labeled.

Study: nature.com/articles/s4158…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
　

Keep Current with ً

ً Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @th_l_t_d_

ً Profile picture
Mar 18
People are scrambling to define "wokeness" (aka basic Left-Wing politics) and coming up with all sorts of convoluted nonsense.

Left is James Lindsay's definition. Incomprehensible theorycel gibberish that will confuse everyone.

Nobody has summarized it better than @MysteryGrove
Between all of the theorycel mystification, Leftists will tell you quite clearly what "wokeness" means: They want to overthrow traditional hierarchies to put "oppressed people" (losers, outcasts, etc.) on top, and to do this, they must destroy Western Civilization.
As MG said, these people are motivated by hatred and resentment. They're neurotic, narcissistic, spiteful, envious, psychopathic, and manipulative.

The "equality" stuff is a smokescreen. If you're a loser, promoting "equality" just means that you get more power and resources.
Read 4 tweets
ً Profile picture
Mar 17
The narrative that Blacks are being genocided by evil cops because of "systemic White supremacy" is an anti-White fabrication (more die from constipation).

Interracial violent crime statistics are an empirical fact that many White people can no longer ignore.
You cannot "divide" what was never united. The elites do want us "fighting among ourselves" which is exactly why they have multiracialized the West and important as many disparate ethnic groups as possible. More ethnic groups, more ethnic conflicts.
How about some studies as proof?

"The more ethnic groups in a state, the more likely it will have a high rate of guerrilla and revolutionary warfare. And the more religious groups in a society, the more intense the general violence."

jstor.org/stable/425106?…
Read 7 tweets
ً Profile picture
Mar 16
When outcasts and losers try to take power and resources from productive people.
The characteristics of Communism were quite clearly laid out by Marx and Engels: Abolish property, family, nationalism, traditional culture, then centralize all production in the hands of the new ruling elite. Leninism + Western Marxism added extra anti-racism and pro-gay stuff. Image
Culturally, America is fully Communist. Cultural Bolshevism and "equality" are enforced via "Civil Rights" laws. Economically, not entirely Communist but there are more regulations, "private-public partnerships," and state-backed monopolies than ever before in American history.
Read 5 tweets
ً Profile picture
Mar 13
No we lost because Civil Rights laws made it illegal to reject "diversity."
I hate it when I lose in the marketplace of ideas (my enemies use state power to ban my ideas).
Academia was lost because it was flooded by swarms of Communists and because the dumb government didn't throw all of these subversives into a gulag in Alaska where they belong.
Read 4 tweets
ً Profile picture
Mar 12
The West in the late 1800s was the pinnacle of human civilization. ImageImageImageImage
Humanity won't see this level of artistic beauty created again on such a grand scale for a very, very long time. Even run-of-the-mill buildings were beautifully designed. ImageImageImageImage
ImageImageImage
Read 6 tweets
ً Profile picture
Mar 12
J. D. Rockefeller is cited as the original Monopoly Man who destroyed society for profit.

He was a devout Christian who was told by a preacher to become rich and dedicate his life to philanthropy. He genuinely loved Blacks, invested in their community, visited their churches...
His wife was an abolitionist whose parents were part of the Underground Railroad.

He spent millions on philanthropy and founded the Rockefeller Foundation when he realized that he wouldn't live long enough to donate his entire wealth.

He was motivated by ideology, not profit.
I've researched the political views of all Gilded Age "Robber Barons." It was a pretty even three-way ideological split between those who were "apolitical" (i.e. just went along with dominant Right-Wing ideology of the era), explicitly Right-Wing, and explicitly Left-Wing.
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

Send Email!

:(