Thread by @BlackFlagExpat

I ASKED CHATGPT A TOUGH ONE AND GOT A 20-SECOND ESSAY BACK 🧵

— Ever heard of Biological Leninism, a soco-political theory originated by @spandrell3 in three essays?

I asked #ChatGPT for a review/critique of those three essays. I can't get used to the rapidity of its reviewing.

About 5 years ago, I became acquainted with a new hypothesis or idea the originator named Biological Leninism, or Bioleninism for short. I found it very compelling and over the last years have observed goings on in politics, geopolitics, and institutions and have seen for myself

how the Bioleninism theory seems to fit, where people of otherwise "low status" or talent appear elevated for no other reason than securing credentials of some sort and/or being very loyal to fringe ideas, some of which contradict observed reality.

Here are three essays outlining the theory. Review all three and provide me with your analysis, agreement, disagreement, critique, etc. Make it a substantial review.

spandrell.com/2017/11/14/bio…

spandrell.com/2017/12/13/bio…

spandrell.com/2018/01/21/len…

@OpenAI #ChatGPT:

Biological Leninism is a concept that posits that the left-wing political and cultural movements in the West are adopting a new strategy of political organization that is based on a biological understanding of human nature.

According to this theory, these movements are seeking to use the power of the state and other institutions to promote the interests of certain biological groups over others.

The author of the essays you linked, Spandrell, argues that this strategy is similar to the Leninist strategy of using the state to promote the interests of the working class over the bourgeoisie.

However, in the case of Biological Leninism, the focus is on promoting the interests of biological groups, such as women, minorities, and LGBT individuals, over the interests of biological groups that are perceived as dominant, such as white males.

One of the key arguments of the theory is that these left-wing movements are using various tactics to achieve their goals, such as promoting diversity and inclusivity, promoting affirmative action, and using political correctness to suppress dissent.

The author argues that these tactics are effective because they appeal to the moral sentiments of people, making it difficult for them to criticize or oppose the movement without being labeled as bigots or racists.

In the first essay, Spandrell provides a more detailed explanation of the theory and discusses its historical roots in Marxist and socialist thought.

He argues that the traditional Marxist focus on class struggle has been replaced by a focus on biological groups, and that this has led to a new form of political organization that is more effective at achieving its goals.

In the second essay, Spandrell discusses the implications of this theory for the future of politics in the West.

He argues that Biological Leninism is likely to become even more influential in the coming years, as the demographic changes in Western countries continue to shift power away from dominant biological groups.

He also suggests that the rise of populism and right-wing movements is a reaction to this trend, and that these movements are likely to be unsuccessful in the long run.

In the third essay, Spandrell provides a more nuanced analysis of the relationship between Leninism and Biological Leninism. He argues that while the two theories have some similarities, there are also significant differences.

For example, Biological Leninism is focused on promoting the interests of certain biological groups, while Leninism is focused on promoting the interests of the working class.

Additionally, Biological Leninism is more decentralized and less hierarchical than Leninism, which makes it more difficult to combat.

Overall, I find the theory of Biological Leninism to be interesting and thought-provoking.

It provides a new perspective on the political and cultural movements that are currently shaping the Western world, and it offers some insights into the strategies that these movements are using to achieve their goals. However, I also have some reservations about the theory.

One of my main criticisms of the theory is that it tends to oversimplify the complex motivations and ideologies of the left-wing movements that it is analyzing. While there may be some truth to the idea that these movements are promoting the interests of certain biological

groups over others, it is important to remember that there are many different strands of thought within these movements, and that they are not all motivated by the same goals or values.

Additionally, I think that the theory may underestimate the power of individual agency and free will in shaping political and cultural movements.

While it is true that moral sentiments and social pressures can be powerful motivators, it is also true that people are capable of making rational decisions based on their own interests and values.

In conclusion, while I find the theory of Biological Leninism to be intriguing, I think that it should be approached with some caution and skepticism.

It offers a useful framework for understanding some of the trends and dynamics of contemporary politics and culture, but it should not be taken as a comprehensive or definitive explanation for these...

/end

It seems to truncate, which is unfortunate. Why? And if there's a limit imposed, what's the harm in making it longer, and also, having it end, at least, at the end of its current paragraph.

But I find the response highly reasonable. It seems that if you ask questions in an objective way, no agenda or particular bias on display, its fucktarded WOKE filter doesn't kick in, programmed by the fucktards running this operation who thinks it can win...

Trying to program a logic-machine to spew illogical bullshit.

It's an a-priori laugh that's doomed to ridicule and failure and the reason its programmers don't realize that very fundamental "cognitive dissonance" in the machine is reason enough to conclude you're dealing with...

Dunning-Kruger Solipsist Fucktards.

And ironically, the essay speaks to that, indirectly.

There are two videos worth watching on the subject of Biological Leninism or #Bioleninism for short.

I have also just published a post at my 20-year-old, 5000+ post blog relating Jamie Lee Curtis' antics post Oscar award to Bioleninism.

freetheanimal.com/2023/03/unders…

That's a wrap!

If you enjoyed this thread:

1. Follow me @BlackFlagExpat for more eclectic onslaughts

2. Grab my Non-Pestering Newsletter (free)

freetheanimal.com/subscribe-to-m…

3. Like and ReTweet the thread below to share with your audience

https://twitter.com/1569588809331015681/status/1637226829432909825