The attacks on Hindus all over the world by Islamic, Christian and now Khalistani groups, is a sorry sign of reality that Hindus have no country. And now they are being held hostage in countries where they emigrated to too.
2. While the threat of Amritpal and Khalistani terror in India is the most important problem for India to solve, it is the change in the status and safety concern of the NRI Hindus that is the new phenomenon.
3. Earlier the riots in India were not directly and violently reflected upon migrant Hindus in the West. Of course there were some reactions and the connection was felt but largely the NRIs could live their own lives without getting involved in Indian affairs in India.
4. It is that Paradigm which has decisively changed. Any small disturbance in India results in Hindus getting physical and violent reprisal in the West, especially the UK and also and other western countries now. This is a result of demographic and political changes in the West.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1. The Pundits: How Hindu Hillmen Secretly Mapped Central Asia
In the previous series, we saw how long before Christ, about 2300 years ago, Indian kings and armies had crossed the Himalayas and established kingdoms deep inside the Taklamakan desert.
2. They kingdom reached even inside the borderlands of China, with influences running as far as Dun-huang which comes inside China proper.
3. In this series we will see how this legacy was continued by individual Indians until India was paralyzed by the ‘frog in the well’ diplomacy of Nehru.
Indians had never quite abandoned their intrepid excursions to Central Asia.
9. This has internationalized Islamic agendas and synchronized them. Partnering with other fundamentalist non-Hindu organizations is a part of this larger strategic game. Right now the global Islamic agenda is renting Khalistani services.
10. Their agendas become same – to destroy India, to hackle Hindus. The hatred of the polytheists is great in this monotheistic world. In most European cities, the Sikh + Islamic populations become overwhelmingly large and are a great personal security risk for Hindus.
11. Especially when Hindus are a population which do not behave as a group, do not throw their weight behind anything. They have fallen into the habit of just getting by as individuals and families and not part of the larger dharmic, national whole.
1. On the Idea of ‘Unified Service for Arcakas’ in Bhāratavarṣa
A few days ago, debate raged on the appointment of the arcakas regarding the Sabarimala temple. @jsaideepak
, advocating for the temple and the deity, made a compelling argument for respecting the tradition.
2. Other Hindu intellectuals responded by saying arcakas have to “adapt or perish”. This debate is essential for our side and should evolve more but it was alarming to notice the uncharacteristic usage of terms like “Adapt or Perish”.
3. “Adapt or Perish” is the language of conquest; of revolution; of dictatorship. It reminds one of the language of communist revolutionaries, who identified their tradition with everything wrong in the world and wanted to destroy it from the roots.
1. Only extreme domain silos devoid of knowledge of real nature of those domains would lead to someone claim that people and society don't matter. Did the Indian State matter to Kanhaiya Lal? I am sure his family would comfort from the 'domain-specific' thinking of yours.
2. To say that people don't invade is to shut your eyes so deep, for so long, reality no longer invade the 'domains'.
Who is invading us from the east? Bangladesh is? Or Bangladeshi Muslims are? Need I say more?
3. And yes, we need clarity of thought on which threat emeges in which domain and how to combat it. You are mixing up religions with states and have a deficient understanding of the lethality of religious Jihad and missions. And thus, the horribly jaundiced and self-lethal view.
1. This thinking shows the narrow IR lens, which ignores civilizational as well as existential threats just because they don't have the concrete form of a modern State and involves saying some uncomfortable truths.
2. China's hegemony shall be prevented and fought tooth and nail. India, as the hegemon, is good for everyone. China in its current form would be a disastrous hegemon.
This is the short lens and should not be ignored.
3. However the long arcs of history and religion cannot be ignored. History shows that no country or tribe which has ever been lost to Christianity or Islam has ever been regained.
Compared to that the fall of the Communist Party of China is an inevitable event.
It is a great folly to believe that only Svayamabodha is necessary and Śatrubodha should be completely neglected. The evidence against that assertion is so overwhelming that it is self-evident, but let us discuss it in some indicators here.
2. Assertion: Śatrubodha is unnecessary, adding that just knowing oneself is enough as it will take care of everything else, including the enemies.
I will indicate 8 ways in which this is wrong and then pursue the whole issue in an article, as it is too long for twitter.
3. Point 1: This assertion is first of all negated by history, by not one or two but thousands of cases. Hindus failed to understand Islam’s true nature, thinking of it as just another sect, resulting in destruction of Hindu society, culture, religion and civilization.