Making pictures of Trump getting arrested while waiting for Trump's arrest.
This blew up etc, so donate to Bellingcat so we can catch bad guys and make scenes like this real bellingcat.com/donate/
Meanwhile, in AI Trump world:
Apparently doing a viral thread about Donald Trump using Midjourney images is enough to get you banned from Midjourney, oops.
At least I still have ChatGPT 4, so here's the Trumpshank Redemption for those of you who have stuck around this long.
One step closer to Trump seeing this thread.
Now I'm banned from Midjourney you'll be spared my Boris Johnson noir detective story
A few things I noticed when generating these images. Midjourney is good at understanding simple actions, but slightly more complex and obscure actions get odd results. This is "Donald Trump wearing an orange prison jumpsuit carving a key out of soap"
Something as simple as "Donald Trump getting peppersprayed" seemed to confuse it a lot. I get the feeling it's drawing on images of people pouring milk in their eyes to counteract the effects of riot control agents.
However, if you use simple actions and common words you can get good results, like "Donald Trump in an orange prison jumpsuit running away from a burning mansion at night in the rain"
Another point about these images is despite some people thinking this is the end of being able to spot fake photos, is that Midjourney just can't recreate real locations accurately, like the European Court of Human rights in this example. The real one is on the right.
When we teach open-source investigations in workshops geolocation is one of the core skills we teach, so if you can't geolocate a photo then it loses a lot of its value (if not all value) as evidence, so in terms of evidence Midjourney images aren't a real problem.
Creating something like a realistic McDonald's restaurant was very difficult, mainly because Midjourney can't handle text very well in images. Here I had to specifically ask for the golden arches to be included, which likely rendered successfully because it's such a distinct… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
However, there's a difference between images as evidence and images as information. A fake image (with or without AI's involvement) can go viral far more quickly than they can be fact checked in most cases.
Fake videos were quickly addressed at the start of Russia's 2022 invasion of Ukraine because of ad hoc communities who came together online who rapidly debunked them, but that's only because of long term engagement of people interested in Ukraine in topics related to… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
So the solution is more education around critical thinking and raising awareness about how to spot fake images. Even with that you'll always have people who share fake images uncritically because it reinforces their own beliefs.
Does this mean Trump will get banned from Midjourney too?
It's been brought to my attention that there's videos published on social media claiming I've made various statements about the US election, related to election integrity. These are part of a Russian disinformation campaign, and the quotes are fabricated, but it's nice to know the Russians hold the value of my opinions in such high regard.
I've previously discussed other videos in this campaign in the below thread:
🧵 1/7: The European Court of Human Rights has ruled in favor of Russian NGOs and media groups (including @Bellingcat), declaring Russia's "foreign agent" legislation a violation of fundamental human rights. The court found that the law imposes undue restrictions on freedom of expression & association.
2/7: The law requires NGOs & individuals receiving foreign funds to register as “foreign agents,” facing stigma, harsh reporting requirements, and severe penalties. This label implies foreign control—without proof—and misleads the public
3/7: The Court noted that the "foreign agent" label, linked to spies & traitors, damages the reputation of those designated and leads to a chilling effect on civil society and public discourse.
It's currently 9:11am, this post has 3 views, and no retweets or likes on an account with 75 followers. Let's see how long it takes for it to get several hundred retweets, and a few tens of thousands of views.
In the last 15 minutes, that tweet just gained 15.7k views, 187 likes, with no retweets. Two other tweets with similarly fake stores, posted around the same time, with similar profiles, have also suddenly gain a couple of hundred likes and around the same amount of views. This is, in real time, how a Russian disinformation campaign is using Twitter to promote its fake stories.
The thing is, nearly all of this engagement, apart from about 10 views and none of the likes, are entirely inauthentic. This doesn't help them reach genuine audiences, it's just boosting their stats so when they report back to their paymasters they can tell them how many views, likes and retweets they got, but they're all fake. It's effectively the people running these campaigns scamming their paymasters to make them think it's working, when it's not at all.
A new fake Bellingcat story, from a fake video claiming to be from Fox News. What's interesting about this one is I viewed the tweet 10 minutes ago, and it had 5 views, and suddenly it jumped to 12.5k, then 16.2k views in less than 5 minutes, with zero retweets or likes.
To me this suggests there's a bot network being used to boost views of tweets used in this disinformation campaign.
In 90 seconds this tweet just gained 154 retweets, another sign of bot activity.
It's clear this is a coordinated attack from pro-Orban media which they really don't want being noticed outside of Hungary, but what they don't seem to realise is I'm now going to use what they did at every presentation I do on disinformation to audiences across the world.
What's notable is the accusations made against Bellingcat were all taken (uncredited) from an article publishing by MintPress claiming we've loads of intelligence agents working for us, which even the original MintPress article fails to prove.
Which to me just means I get to add a couple more slides to the presentation I'll be doing about this, to audiences made up of exactly the sort of people they didn't want to find out about this.
State actors see alternative media ecosystems as a vehicle for promoting their agendas, and take advantage of that by not just covertly funding them, but also giving them access to their officials and platforming them at places like the UN.
A recent example of that is Jackson Hinkle going to Eastern Ukraine, then getting invited to the UN by Russia to speak at a press conference, and that footage being used by state media as evidence of "experts" rejecting the "mainstream narratives" on Ukraine.
A lack of transparency around the funding of the individuals and websites that are part of these alternative media ecosystems allows for state actors to get away with their covert influence, a clear example of which we've seen over the last 24 hours.