honestly i think @InfraHaz broke these peoples brains beyond repair. You can’t even discuss orthodox Marxism without someone crying about Haz, someone completely irrelevant to the conversation.
Me: “Hey maybe a billionaire funded NGO isn’t real activism”
Radlibs: “Haz! Maupin! You’re a national socialist!!!”
The New Left COINTELPRO libs aren’t sending their best
None of this has anything to do with Haz yet these radlibs will namedrop @InfraHaz as a way to escape providing any real analysis. They simply mention his name and hope that the other person shrivels in embarrassment.
Unfortunately for them this doesn’t work with real Marxists, ones who aren’t defined by random niche online communities. Also remember these are the same people who think podcasting is activism.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Daily reminder that "PatSocs" and the discourse surrounding this phenomenon is fed shit. PatSocs aren't real and the phenomenon only exists in extremely online communities.
Patriotism of Socialists has always been inherent, international.
The term Social Patriot is adequate to describe Browderists, those "patriotic" movements that support the national bourgeoisie. Using "PatSoc" just means you're extremely online and aren't aware of already existing vernacular for this phenomenon.