Matthew 18 may be the most abused and misused passage of Scripture in occasions of abuse in the church. Such a beautiful passage about interpersonal reconciliation is often used as a club by abusers and their enablers to silence, shame, and further abuse their victims.
Matthew 18 is neither the exclusive method of dealing with sin (see how Jesus and Paul publicly confront sin in their ministries) nor is it an exclusive requirement for all church sin matters to be handled "in house." In fact, there are certain sins that either by its grievous
nature (e.g. Sexual abuse) and/or its deep systemic impact (e.g. Church leadership covering up or justifying sinful actions) that must be handled externally and independent of the local church, fulfilling legal requirements of the civil magistrate and alerting the public and
other Christian entities of the troubling matters that are being mishandled and perpetuated in the name of Christ.
This is where the rubber hits the road: I have personally heard Christian leaders claiming that victims of abuse should not speak publicly about their abuse unless
they privately meet with their abuser and that they are in sin until they do so. These same leaders often posture themselves as "concerned about your spiritual wellbeing," but end up doing more damage and side with the abusers by twisting Matthew 18 into a power tactic. Instead
of standing with the abused and wanting to root out heinous and systemic sin at its fount, they strain gnats at all they consider "wrong procedures" and "not in good order" that the abused committed. They make it seem as though the greater sin committed was not following
arbitrary protocol rather than the clear breaking of God's law in love of neighbor.
The church needs more leaders who are more than willing to side with the vulnerable and speak truth to power within the church, even at great cost. The church needs leaders who are willing to
see that their true life calling by Jesus is to lose all reputation for the sake of righteousness and the love of the least of these.
It is Jesus who will say on that day, "as you did it to one of the least of these my brothers, you did it to me."
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I've written and spoken about spiritual abuse quite often not only because it is sadly a part of my story but also so that others can for the first time think to themselves, "I'm not crazy!"
Here's a thread of everything I've written and spoken:
5 signs of spiritual abuse. Not exhaustive, but a good start in seeing signs of spiritual abuse.
One tell-tale sign of cult-like behavior is what is said about a person who leaves a church/organization. It became very clear as I left certain church circles that there was an entire narrative that had been crafted about me and the reason I had left - all of which were false.
I've heard of everything from being a scapegoat for an organization's financial woes to becoming "liberal" to wanting to make a platform for myself to just being a bitter person. It was never framed around the issues of spiritual abuse, racism, misogyny, and moral compromise.
These were the true reasons I left these circles, but they are inconvenient for those who want to paint their churches as always pristine & always the good guys. It's far easier to chalk up people like me leaving as disgruntled former members instead of people who got pushed out.
One of the most painful things is when you share your story of spiritual abuse with someone you trust and respect and they break their friendship with you rather than believe you and act on what you've shared.
Christians & churches are often so ill-equipped to provide suitable spiritual care for those who have undergone spiritual abuse & trauma. We often don't have the framework to be able to walk with people who have experienced harm from the church rather than find ways to cure them.
Churches that have small groups/community groups have an opportunity to foster an environment that is safe to walk through their experience and especially to provide care to people who just aren't ready to jump back into Sunday worship at a church.
It was not just that Presbyterians individually were slave owners, but the fact that Presbyterian congregations as a body owned enslaved people and would fund endowments, pastors' salaries, and other works of ministry through the leasing of enslaved work.
This actually heightens the discussion about reparations because it is clear that Presbyterianism in America (second only to Anglicanism in America) was directly funded through the institution of slavery, so much so that congregations as a body would own enslaved people.
These Presbyterian congregations would lease their slaves to the highest bidders in order to increase profits for the congregation so that they could pay their pastor's salary as well as their ministry work as a whole. They funded endowments for these congregations.
People often blame White Evangelicals who are a part of churches that are about entertainment and loose on doctrine to explain the 81% vote for Trump. The problem is that there were plenty of theologically conservative, doctrinally precise, hymns/psalms only who supported Trump.
I'll make this even more pointed: there were many Reformed Christians, churches, church leaders, and seminary professors who love to talk about liturgy this, theology that, doctrine this, reverent worship that, who supported Trump.
It's easy to dunk on wishy washy Evangelical types. But the real issue is the theologically serious who sold their souls for Trump and making Trumpism safe in their churches. It is very few and far between that you would have found Reformed leaders who stood against Trump.
Christians in the US fail to recognize that immigration laws have historically been racially motivated in the country as a way to prevent non-White people from either entering the country or integrating as full members of society. They have been used as a tool of White supremacy.
That's not just a hunch or an opinion. Read the historic immigration laws, the policies that were developed by agencies in the US, court rulings at both local and federal levels, and the influential rhetoric of politicians and leaders over the past several centuries.
Even further and more damning, read the views promulgated by Christians and denominations/churches over the years regarding immigration and immigration policies. The history of blocking immigration based on race, forced deportations of non-White people, and the prevention