Alexander Profile picture
Mar 21 5 tweets 2 min read
"Age-gaps that do exist are consistent with the preferences of both men and women—at least during their early to middle reproductive periods."

"Large age-gaps are not negatively associated with measures of fertility or well-being for either sex."

sciencedirect.com/science/articl…
This is a replication of Lawson et al. who found the same result in a Tanzanian sample: higher satisfaction was associated with larger gaps, no greater risk of divorce nor lower fertility.

sciencedirect.com/science/articl…
This is the difference between the actual age of a spouse and the ideal age gap for men and women.

Interestingly, across these four regions a lot of women preferred younger men.

However, the desired age gap is much closer to the actual spousal age gap for women. Image
Here is the risk of divorce in the second paper. No difference for small and large gaps: Image
And here are mental health and fertility measures from that paper. No difference for any age gap range when the man is older: Image

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Alexander

Alexander Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @datepsych

Mar 22
How many dating app matches lead to real-world meet-ups?

A thread on dating app data that analyzed potential real-world matches by looking at who exchanged phone numbers in their messages. 🧵
Big sample of app users and messages: Image
Men initiate most messages and about half of all messages following a match don't progress to a real conversation.

The remaining half will be called "mutual conversations" in the analysis. Image
Read 20 tweets
Mar 15
Never forget that the red pill is men learning about "female nature" by reading anecdotes in tabloids:
This whole article is a collection of anecdotes from women who cheat. Not much needs to be said about selection bias.

This part stood out however - is it true? Image
There is a question in this data asking married people if they ever cheated.

Here are what the results show for men and women, age 28-55 (when most people are married, and not divorced or widowed), using the same dataset:

Year 1991: Image
Read 14 tweets
Mar 10
Mean choking intensity was 3.8 out of 10 (1 was "very light") and the SD was 1.7, so very few people reported engaging in hard choking.
8.7% of women said choking was not pleasurable, but they let a partner do it.

5.2% said they didn't want it to be done to them.

82% said it was a little, somewhat, or very pleasurable.

93% reported it was consensual.
Read 13 tweets
Mar 7
Genetics predict performance on practically every cognitive measure we have (not just IQ tests).

A thread 🧵 with examples.
The Stroop task, a measure of cognitive executive control. 50% heritability estimate.

link.springer.com/article/10.118…
Heritability in this flanker style backwards masking task that measures capacity for cognitive control, about 60%.

sciencedirect.com/science/articl…
Read 25 tweets
Mar 7
Very interesting finding here. These are the charts from this paper.

AHPVT is the The Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test as a measure of intelligence.
Here is a chart of other factors in this paper that predicted having sex.

Physical attractiveness interestingly doesn't predict it, nor did sport participation.

Maybe we can rule out the teen Chad hypothesis.
A few of the larger associations in this:

Teens who had sex were also less likely to live to age 35.

Had lower GPAs and were less likely to enter college.

Scored higher in impulsivity.

And were less likely to have both parents in the home.
Read 15 tweets
Mar 7
Recent FIRE survey of American academics on free expression and academic freedom.

"Faculty are markedly more tolerant than the students they teach."

thefire.org/research-learn…
"Roughly three-in-five faculty (61%) surveyed said that “a university professor should be free to express any of their ideas or convictions on any subject,” and more than half (52%) said speech should only be restricted “where words are certain to incite physical violence.”
"On average, 81% of faculty supported allowing four different hypothetical controversial speakers on campus, compared to 48% of the students who were asked about the same speakers in FIRE’s College Free Speech Rankings (CFSR) survey."
Read 11 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(