@realFFK was the first person to falsely credit my popular quote to Okadigbo. Despite the fact that I’ve provided evidence to prove that the very popular quote is mine, and not Okadigbo’s, people are still crediting it falsely to the late sage.
Fani-Kayode started this madness, and @DailyPostNGR went to town with it. There’s no day that I don’t get tagged by conscientious citizens who have been struggling to correct those that wrongly attribute it to Okadigbo.
We do not respect intellectual property in this country.
The first time that this quote ever came to public consciousness was on June 6, 2017 in my post on Facebook. It is still available online for fact checking. For ease of reference, kindly read paragraph 4 of the said Facebook post here. m.facebook.com/story.php?stor…
If any one can provide verifiable proof that this quote predates June 6, 2017, I should be seen as a liar. The truth is that there’s none. Prove me wrong.
A reporter with Daily Post, for reasons best known to him, took this quote from FFK’s social media handle and published it.
I would have excused him and Daily Post if I didn’t offer them the opportunity to fact-check and correct their error. Fani-Fakode should refer us to any book, article or newspaper publication or any verifiable record where Okadigbo made this statement. He started this plagiarism.
This is the said Daily Post article of October 20, 2017. Kindly take note of the date it was published and compare it with the date the quote appeared in my Facebook post and make your deductions.
If you Google this quote, every source, reference or material that you’ll see is post June 6, 2017. There’s no evidence this quote existed before that date.
I believe the children of the deceased sage are alive, they should honour their father’s name by proving me wrong.
A sad part of this theft of my intellectual property, is that nearly all newspapers in Nigeria have published articles with this quote falsely credited to Okadigbo. @GuardianNigeria, @TheNationNews, @daily_trust, @DailyPostNGR, @THISDAYLIVE, etc, are GUILTY of this plagiarism.
@elrufai on his part, had falsely attributed the same quote to the late Bala Usman. In his own case, he did it on June 10, 2017 (four days after I originally authored the quote).
The evidence is also attached. The @thecableng published El-Rufai’s false attribution to Bala Usman.
I am tagging the newspapers to challenge them to fact-check my claims, and report their findings to the whole country. If they find evidence that this quote is originally traceable to the late Okadigbo, let them publish it for the benefit of the public.
It will be a shame if none of them accepts this challenge.
As far back as October 12, 2019, Prof. @farooqkperogi wrote an article titled: “Epidemic of plagiarism in Nigerian traditional and social media” where he referenced the plagiarism of my quote.
Efforts to correct this false attribution has failed because people will rather die in their ignorance of this issue, than accept correction. They just cannot accept the fact that a quote that the whole country is sharing, was authored by a young Inibehe Effiong, not Okadigbo.
It has also failed because the media has refused to do the responsible thing, but continues to propagate this falsehood.
Let it be known that Okadigbo was a respected citizen, I have no intention of denigrating his name or legacy. However, facts are sacred. We should be honest.
I hope that someone will have the interest to take up this issue and fact-check it.
I am available to answer any question. I also challenge such a person or persons to contact Fani-Kayode and El-Rufai for them to substantiate their attributions. Let the media be responsible.
History will vindicate the just.
The Daily Post article where the quote was reported as falsely credited by Okadigbo was published on October 23, 2017 (not October 20, 2017), please.
This morning, I woke up to see notifications on Instagram, showing that Kanayo O. Kanayo has also committed the same error and people tried to correct him. I had to make this clarification again.
I will credit anyone that can present any credible and verifiable proof, that it was Okadigbo who authored this quote, or that it existed before June 6, 2017 with N200,000.
It’s disgusting how many insist on a lie because they believe I’m too young to have said these words. Sad!
This is the full version of the falsehood that people have been circulating. You can see here that @THISDAYLIVE used a full page in January 2020 to publish my June 6, 2017 quote, which FFK falsely credited to Okadigbo. Thisday stated here that they culled it “from the internet”.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Reports that @PeterObi in his election petition is not seeking to be declared the winner of the election is false and misleading. I’ve seen a copy of the petition. Peter Obi has prayed that he should be declared the winner. The law allows a petitioner to seek alternative reliefs.
That is what Peter Obi and Labour Party have done in their petition before the Court of Appeal. They are seeking reliefs in the alternative; either that he be declared as the winner having scored majority of lawful votes cast, or that the entire election be nullified.
There is no issue here. Those who are making issues out of the imbalanced media reports on the contents of the petition are doing so either because they’ve not seen and read the petition, or they are mischievous or they don’t understand.
The Court of Appeal has granted INEC permission to reconfigure BVAS.
The Court of Appeal granted INEC’s request because the electoral body said all data in BVAS machines would be transferred to a back end server before they are reconfigured and will not be tampered with.
The court also ordered INEC to allow the Applicants to inspect and carry out digital forensic examination of all the electoral materials used in the conduct of the elections, as well as to avail them the Certified True Copies, of result of the physical inspection of the BVAS.
By virtue of Section 60 (5) of the Electoral Act 2022 and Clause 38 of the Regulations and Guidelines for the Conduct of Election, 2022, presiding officers must transmit results to the INEC Result Viewing Portal on completion of elections. Failure to comply is a criminal offence.
A presiding officer that violates this requirement is liable on conviction to a fine of N500,000 or imprisonment for a term not less than six months. This is how important the issue of electronic transmission of results to the INEC Result Viewing Portal is under the law.
Given the nationwide substantial failure of presiding officers to transfer results to the INEC Result Viewing Portal as mandated by law, this election was conducted in contravention of the law. The INEC has admitted this contravention and there should be legal consequences.
I agree with the objection filed by the A.G.F, Malami SAN, challenging the competence of the suit filed by Kaduna, Kogi and Zamfara States on the new Naira notes. The Supreme Court’s original jurisdiction under Section 232 of the Constitution shouldn’t be invoked in this case.
We shouldn’t bastardize the legal system due to political expediency. For the Supreme Court to have original jurisdiction, there must be a dispute between the three States and the Federation; not a dispute between the States and the Federal Government. What’s the dispute here?
There’s a difference in law between the Federation and the Federal Government. I’m unable to see how the redesign of the currency by the CBN has clothed the Supreme Court with the requisite original jurisdiction in this matter. This is a case for the Federal High Court.
The main issue is, the purported fresh primary of June 9, 2022 that the APC claimed it conducted where Lawan is said to have emerged, was it done in compliance with the provisions of Sections 82 and 84 of the Electoral Act as regards 21 days notice to INEC and monitoring by INEC?
Let’s even leave the argument about the mode of commencement for a second; whether Machina was right to commence his suit by Originating Summons instead of Writ of Summons.
Senator Ahmad Lawan lost out in the APC presidential primary on the 8th of June. The following day, the APC claimed to have conducted a fresh senatorial “primary” in his favour. 24 hours after losing. Isn’t the timing itself revealing of the fraud perpetuated against Machina?
Any law that empowers the government to confiscate and/ or auction the vehicle or other property of a citizen for an alleged offense(s), without fair hearing and due process is unconstitutional and void. Such a law offends the fundamental rights to fair hearing and property.
The court of law will declare such a law inconsistent with the provisions of 36 and 43 of the Constitution which guarantees the rights of every person to fair hearing and ownership of property, respectively. Lagos State Government claims that Mobile Courts permitted the auctions.
That is not a sufficient answer to the constitutionality issues arising from the auctions. What procedures were followed in securing the orders from the Mobile Courts? Since traffic violations are criminal offences, offenders must first be tried before punishment can be imposed.