Micro-reactors are quite the popular topic right now, so let's talk about how you make a REALLY micro-reactor using the best (thermal) nuclear fuel we know of, Americium! Specifically, the isotope Am-24m. 🧵1/
Americium was discovered in 1944 by Glenn Seaborg using a cyclotron, but is a pretty common transuranic (i.e. element after uranium) to encounter. It is a common isotope in spent nuclear fuel (~100g/ton), although most of it is Am-241 and Am-243. 2/
You may even have Americium in your home in the form of a smoke detector! It is a powerful alpha radiation emitter, which makes it a good source of ionization for smoke detectors. Also potentially a good RTG fuel, with ESA looking heavily into this. 3/
All isotopes of americium can fission, but the rarer Am-242m is unique because its thermal fission cross section (chance of fission) is ~7000 barns! That means it is ~12X higher than U-235 (and U-233) and~9X higher than Pu-239! It also emits ~1.2X more neutrons per fission! 4/
This means it can get stunningly small critical masses! Some studies have come up with reactors that only needed <8 grams of Am-242m! This can allow for extremely small reactors for space or potentially medical applications! 5/
It should be noted that this huge advantage is only present for THERMAL reactors though, where we slow the neutrons down in something like water. For fast fission, Am-242m has little advantage over conventional fuels and thus your sci-fi micro nukes won't be using it! 6/
There are plenty of other sci-fi applications though! Am-242m has been investigated for ultra tiny reactors for neutron therapy at hospitals, ~4 MW/kg nuclear rockets, and ultra small aqueous power reactors. 7/
There were also proposals to make better gas core and fission fragment rockets, and even revisiting the nuclear piston engine concept using Am-242m! With 70% savings in mass for the rocket and high specific power nuclear piston engines, it may be worth another look. 8/12
Of course the big question is how do we make this rare isotope? Am-241 is common portion of spent nuclear fuel as mentioned above and we can use *careful* neutron capture to make Am-242m. Typically the schemes proposed rely on fast neutron capture, to lower the loss 242. 9/12
One proposal actually used special rods placed into a typical LWR power reactor! The rods would have Am-241 behind a thermal neutron absorber (Gd in this case). They showed that ~1.1 kg/GWe-yr of 8.65% Am-242m can be made and you get >7 kg/GWe-yr of >80% Pu-238 as well! 10/12
The other proposal I found was for an Am-241 breeding blanket in a fast reactor. It was able to create >120 kg of Am-242m using ~10 tons of Am-241, which is quite a lot! The Am-242m would be of high purity though, and thus immediately usable. 11/12
Who knows if Am-242m will ever be used for as a nuclear fuel, but it sure looks like something interesting to consider for speciality applications! Maybe in a fast reactor powered future we could even get the supply large enough (and price low enough) to consider! 12/12
So nuclear uprates are in vogue again due to increased demand and gov incentives. An interesting historic thing to note is that BWRs historically have received HUGE uprates with the US fleet running at ~121.5% of installed capacity! 1/6 gevernova.com/nuclear/servic…
I was looking around for what else could be done and found (again) this cool document about the Resource renewable BWR (RBWR) concept from Hitachi. The idea is that we could substantially alter the cores of current BWRs and make them net waste burners! 2/ hitachihyoron.com/rev/pdf/2014/r…
The concept relies on loading two zones of the fuel with transuranic elements (TRUs) and then putting the fuel rods closer together. The neutron spectra is hardened in these regions, thus allowing for burning of the these troublesome TRUs. 2/6
Ok last time I posted a thread about making antimatter, now let's talk about using it in a rocket! Antimatter rocket concepts cover the full gamut in performance from launchers off Earth to interstellar speed machines and everything in between! 1/22
We should first talk about why antimatter? The interest is in the extreme energy density, which then could allow for rockets with very, very high specific impulse. This is like the gas mileage for a rocket and means that we don't need much antimatter to go very fast! 2/22
Antimatter should also allow for reasonably high thrust to weight ratios (TWR), which means the rocket can accelerate up to speed on a reasonable time scale. Once again it comes back to that awesome energy density of ~9E10 MJ/kg, about 1000X fission and 300X fusion! 3/22
So one fun thing sci-fi fans like to talk about a lot is antimatter (specifically antiprotons) production for starships. The fun part is that we already make antimatter right now! But to get enough antimatter for any uses, we need to do a LOT better. 1/17
The standing record for antiproton production is from @Fermilab during the Tevatrons final years. They hit ~2 nanograms/yr using a spinning iconel target getting bombarded with a 120 GeV proton beam! The target did not live long.... 2/17
@CERN uses a similar approach now, but they are not as incentivized for high production rates since their collider doesn't use antiprotons like the Tevatron did. However, they have really been pushing the science of antimatter storage forward! 3/17
Since I have seen this article make the rounds a couple times now, I wanted to address how silly the arguments against this HEU fueled test reactor are. Here is a little thread about HEU fueled reactors and why these complaints are BS!🧵 1/11 reuters.com/world/us/us-ur…
So first of all, what is HEU? Highly Enriched Uranium (HEU) is any uranium with more than 20% U-235, which is the naturally occurring fissile isotope. Natural uranium is 0.7% and typical reactor fuel is 3-5%, but some very small reactors use higher enrichment. 2/11
Above 20% enrichment it is legally classified as HEU. We can quibble about the exact number, but the reasoning is that at this point it is much easier to further enrich the fuel to get to "bomb grade", which is ~90%. So everything from 20% to 99.9% U-235 is treated equally. 3/11
So I finally got around to reading this incredible book on NUCLEAR PUMPED LASERS and boy is it full of interesting stuff! The first 12 chapters are an updated English translation of a Russian book, while the final chapter is about work in the US. They did some wild stuff! 🧵1/13
The concept goes back to the invention of the laser. What if we could directly power a laser with the might of a nuclear reactor or explosion? This looked especially appealing when lasers were horrendously inefficient and thus the Nuclear Pumped Laser (NPL) was born! 2/13
The idea here is that neutrons, gamma rays, or charged particles could directly excite a material to "lase". This would side step the inefficiencies of making electricity and then turning that electricity into light to then pump the laser. 3/13
So there has been a big hubbub about the recent hydrogen production projects at places like the 9 Mile Nuclear plant. I get the concern over dirty hydrogen production as a form of greenwashing, but I also think the folks who are really worked up are missing something. 1/5
Say whatever you will about hydrogen as energy storage (I am not a big fan personally), but we already use a lot of hydrogen for critical industrial applications! ~90 MT per year, of which ~1/3 of that is fertilizer! Currently all of that is fossil derived hydrogen. 2/5
It seems to me that encouraging green hydrogen production, regardless of direct electricity source matching, is a good way to get the infrastructure in place to clean up hydrogen production that we NEED. The electrolyzer don't care if the power is nuclear, solar, coal, etc! 3/5