Gerrit Bruhaug Profile picture
Mar 23 13 tweets 8 min read
Micro-reactors are quite the popular topic right now, so let's talk about how you make a REALLY micro-reactor using the best (thermal) nuclear fuel we know of, Americium! Specifically, the isotope Am-24m. 🧵1/
Americium was discovered in 1944 by Glenn Seaborg using a cyclotron, but is a pretty common transuranic (i.e. element after uranium) to encounter. It is a common isotope in spent nuclear fuel (~100g/ton), although most of it is Am-241 and Am-243. 2/
You may even have Americium in your home in the form of a smoke detector! It is a powerful alpha radiation emitter, which makes it a good source of ionization for smoke detectors. Also potentially a good RTG fuel, with ESA looking heavily into this. 3/
All isotopes of americium can fission, but the rarer Am-242m is unique because its thermal fission cross section (chance of fission) is ~7000 barns! That means it is ~12X higher than U-235 (and U-233) and~9X higher than Pu-239! It also emits ~1.2X more neutrons per fission! 4/
This means it can get stunningly small critical masses! Some studies have come up with reactors that only needed <8 grams of Am-242m! This can allow for extremely small reactors for space or potentially medical applications! 5/
It should be noted that this huge advantage is only present for THERMAL reactors though, where we slow the neutrons down in something like water. For fast fission, Am-242m has little advantage over conventional fuels and thus your sci-fi micro nukes won't be using it! 6/
There are plenty of other sci-fi applications though! Am-242m has been investigated for ultra tiny reactors for neutron therapy at hospitals, ~4 MW/kg nuclear rockets, and ultra small aqueous power reactors. 7/
There were also proposals to make better gas core and fission fragment rockets, and even revisiting the nuclear piston engine concept using Am-242m! With 70% savings in mass for the rocket and high specific power nuclear piston engines, it may be worth another look. 8/12
Of course the big question is how do we make this rare isotope? Am-241 is common portion of spent nuclear fuel as mentioned above and we can use *careful* neutron capture to make Am-242m. Typically the schemes proposed rely on fast neutron capture, to lower the loss 242. 9/12
One proposal actually used special rods placed into a typical LWR power reactor! The rods would have Am-241 behind a thermal neutron absorber (Gd in this case). They showed that ~1.1 kg/GWe-yr of 8.65% Am-242m can be made and you get >7 kg/GWe-yr of >80% Pu-238 as well! 10/12
The other proposal I found was for an Am-241 breeding blanket in a fast reactor. It was able to create >120 kg of Am-242m using ~10 tons of Am-241, which is quite a lot! The Am-242m would be of high purity though, and thus immediately usable. 11/12
Who knows if Am-242m will ever be used for as a nuclear fuel, but it sure looks like something interesting to consider for speciality applications! Maybe in a fast reactor powered future we could even get the supply large enough (and price low enough) to consider! 12/12

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Gerrit Bruhaug

Gerrit Bruhaug Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @GBruhaug

Mar 22
So there has been a big hubbub about the recent hydrogen production projects at places like the 9 Mile Nuclear plant. I get the concern over dirty hydrogen production as a form of greenwashing, but I also think the folks who are really worked up are missing something. 1/5
Say whatever you will about hydrogen as energy storage (I am not a big fan personally), but we already use a lot of hydrogen for critical industrial applications! ~90 MT per year, of which ~1/3 of that is fertilizer! Currently all of that is fossil derived hydrogen. 2/5
It seems to me that encouraging green hydrogen production, regardless of direct electricity source matching, is a good way to get the infrastructure in place to clean up hydrogen production that we NEED. The electrolyzer don't care if the power is nuclear, solar, coal, etc! 3/5
Read 5 tweets
Jan 15
So fusion has been in the news quite a bit. Have y'all ever heard of the "only known way to get fusion power NOW" (paraphrasing Teller)? It is known as Peaceful Nuclear Explosion Reactor (PNER) or Project PACER! Set off thermonuclear bombs and make steam power! 🧵1/12
I had heard of the original idea many years ago, but never knew it was revisited until this past Friday. The original concept was to use 20-50 kT nuclear explosions every couple hours in a 100 m salt dome (made via nuke) to make >1 GWe via direct nuclear to steam heating! 2/12
There was even a nuclear test in relation to this concept, the Project Gnome shot! A 3.1 kT underground test in New Mexico that was to look into making electricity with nukes, making isotopes with nukes and even nuclear bomb fracking! 3/12
Read 14 tweets
Dec 28, 2022
Have you ever heard of a gas core reactor? No not a gas cooled reactor, but a reactor with a gas CORE! This is a concept dating back to the Manhattan Project to just let the core become gaseous (or maybe plasma) instead of solid or even liquid. 🧵1/16
The idea is quite old and is appealing since now the fuel has no damage limits, can be easily reprocessed online, and can run at truly stunning temperatures (thousands of degrees). You also don't have to convert UF6 back into U or UO2, which saves effort and energy. 2/16
The Soviets built the first gas core reactor in 1957. It was a very classic rod style reactor, but with rods full of UF6 instead of solid fuel. This was not ideal for future gas core plans, but made for an easy gas core reactor to build and study. 3/16
Read 17 tweets
Dec 12, 2022
Super quick thread on the NIF results since these got leaked early. I was under the impression the official announcement was on Tuesday, but I guess someone talked to the press early!🧵 1/17 ft.com/content/4b6f0f…
So NIF is the largest, most energetic laser in the world. It was built to push a form of fusion called "inertial confinement fusion" (ICF) forward and help with the goal of stockpile stewardship (i.e. management of the nuclear arsenal). 2/17 lasers.llnl.gov
It was originally claimed that NIF would "ignite on the first shot" since it was based on supposedly well understood physics from the nuclear testing days. LLNL was so confident they also began design a fusion power plant! 3/17 en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laser_Ine…
Read 17 tweets
Dec 2, 2022
So when talking about recycling spent nuclear fuel (i.e. "waste"), we often like to focus on turning it back into more nuclear since that is an amazing trick! But there are also lots of useful isotopes to recover and if we recycle at scale it could really change things! 🧵 1/17
When atoms fissions, we get a broad range of isotopes with most of them massing either ~95 or ~137 amu, but there is a broad distribution and the exact make-up depends on isotope and neutron energy. 2/17 hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/NucEne/f…
The first obvious isotopes to recover are the ones we already do at research reactors, medical isotopes! Mo-99 is the most common fission fragment recovered, and it is used as a source of Tc-99m for medical diagnostics. I personally have even had some! 3/17
Read 17 tweets
Nov 10, 2022
A term that is often tossed around in advanced nuclear propulsion circles that drives me nuts is "low radiation". It often isn't even right and NEVER means what people imagine it does (almost no shielding needed). Let's look at how many rads we actually get from reactions. 🧵1/11
Ionizing radiation in this case will be counted as gamma rays and neutrons, since the charged particles are easy to stop and typically very useful. Also we will ignore neutrinos since they aren't a health hazard. 2/11
Let's start with fission since everyone always assumes it is the worst. Looking at the chart we see 7 MeV of prompt gammas, 7 MeV of delayed gammas and 5 MeV of neutrons. Compare that to the 168 MeV of FF ions and 8 MeV of electrons of usable energy! 3/11 Image
Read 11 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(