I'm just going to say one more thing about the #ProjectConnect situation until there are any more developments:
If you were an Austin progressive excited for rail, but you also cheered the death of Manchin's permitting reform bill: congratulations, you got what you asked for.
Yes, Austin officials are uniquely inept with money on transit projects a way many cities aren't, but the fact is: one reason the light rail plan got reduced is it depended on federal grants, and those grants now require local govts to set aside 40% of funding for contingencies.
And the main kind of "contingency" that made the federal government decide to impose this huge budget constraint? Frivolous local permitting lawsuits. The kind of crap Manchin's bill was intended to address.
So congrats: by lobbying Dems against permitting reform, you successfully made it harder to build a pipeline in West Virginia. You also helped cut the size of Austin's desperately needed light rail phase I in half, ensuring way more car traffic and more CO2 emissions for years.
Anyway, I still have optimism we can build the core part of the system Austinites voted for, and plan for expansions. But we should have been able to build all of it now. It is embarrassing how expensive it is to build ANYTHING in America. And we need a solution to that now.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I've heard a lot of people make a good case for Option 2 (North Lamar to Pleasant Valley) but even those people are basically saying, pick that *alignment* and then fight to change it to have grade separation downtown.
If these are indeed the only 5 options set in stone (which I'm honestly not sure of), then go with the one that grade-separates Republic Square (essential for connectivity and future capacity) AND hits UT, the Capitol, and gives South Austin good coverage.
Not having an airport connection is disappointing from an optics perspective, but it is not a priority for ridership. Not having a connection to the Convention Center or NLTC are bigger issues. But this plan clearly sets up the system to be extended to all these places.
Of the five initial operating segment proposals for Austin's light rail system, @CapMetroATX should definitely choose the one that keeps an underground segment downtown.
It's the clear best option from a long-term planning perspective.
Yes, it's not the option with the most coverage upfront, and yes, it'll suck the line won't initially go to the airport. But it makes more sense to start with expensive infrastructure that gives the trunk room for capacity, rather than go for length first and risk bottlenecks.
We don't want Austin to make the same mistake as Dallas.
DART has a big chokepoint downtown where a bunch of lines converge on an at-grade segment, and they're only now trying to plan out an underground segment to ease that pressure.
I did not have it on my bingo card that Trump would be the one pointing out Florida has worse crime than New York.
Astonishing what happens when the truth and Trump's ulterior motives actually line up for once.
Also, Trump mentioned one thing about Florida that is REALLY not talked about as much as it should: adjusted for income, Florida's cities are now the least-affordable places to live in the U.S.
This is why I don't think the huge population growth there will continue much longer.
This myth needs to die. Nazis did not support gun control. They had pretty much a two-tier attitude on gun rights: arm the masses of "real" Germans, militarize the society, but use the guns owned by disfavored minorities as excuses to police them psychotically.
Not too dissimilar to how gun laws in some U.S. states work in practice, actually. Everyone has the right to own a gun, unless you're Black and a police officer shoots you during a traffic stop for perfectly legally carrying it.
So many people don't understand the Nazi dictatorship was not just a top-down bureaucracy. It was a whole-of-society project where the regular people were radicalized to turn on each other in the name of state ideology. That would never have worked if the Nazis disarmed everyone!
The biggest plot contrivance in The Little Mermaid II is that Ariel never explains to her daughter why she is forbidden to go in the sea, even though she has a totally valid reason that a young child would understand, and it's just... never explained why she kept it from her.
In the beginning of the film, it makes it seem like Ariel's plan is to prevent her daughter from even finding out the sea exists, so she doesn't even have the urge to go in it at all. Which *kind of* makes sense as a plan? But flash forward 12 years and...
...the film makes it clear Melody does know the sea exists and does have a passionate desire to be in it. With that cat out of the bag, there is *no reason* for Ariel not to explain about Morgana and the fact her life would be in danger. Instead she just says, no, it's forbidden.
Does everyone get to choose which of the two new countries they belong to?
What if someone wants to immigrate between them?
What kind of border will exist? Will there be a trade and customs union, or a hard border?
How do you keep families together?
What about the military? Do they get to choose which country's military they'll fight for?
How are you going to decide who gets what resources? Blue areas need food from red areas, which need tools from blue areas to produce it. How does that work?