The Samnites were old rivals of Rome, and did pretty well for a while before they went the way of the rest of Rome’s enemies for the centuries of their pomp - defeat, assimilation, obliteration.
This is a story of their success, which was also their failure - with not one but two lessons.
The Samnites were commanded in 321 BC by Gaius Pontius, who learned that the Roman army in the field against him was presently to be found at Calatia.
He had ten of his men disguised as local herdsmen who, approaching the Romans separately by varying routes at different times, all told them the same thing - that the Samnites were busy laying siege to the town of Lucera.
Here’s the first lesson. The same lie, repeated to you ten times from different sources, is still a lie. It gains nothing in the retelling and repetition.
Having not read their #Deanehistory, the Romans fell for it and marched on Lucera to relieve the town.
The fastest route there was by the road we have come to call the Appian Way. So their predictable route took them through a narrow pass in the Campanian mountains called the Caudine Forks.
The dilemma is easily understood. The Romans marched into the pass. Getting to the other end, they found it barricaded. Turning about face, the end by which they’d entered was now barricaded too. The whole Roman army was trapped.
But what do you do when you have the tiger by the tail? Pontius had realised a success with his scheme he’d never quite imagined. So he did as many of us do when faced with an adult conundrum. He asked his Dad for advice.
Pontius was rather nonplussed by the reply he got to his letter. His father Herennius said, you should let them all go, ASAP.
Well I don’t really fancy that, Dad - we don’t notch up wins against the Romans all that often, I don’t want to let this slide - what’s option B, please?
Option B, came the reply, is also clear: kill them all, every last man. Leave no survivors.
Pontius, not surprisingly, asked his father - who by this point had been summonsed to the pass within which the Romans were still stewing - why he had two such opposing recommendations.
Herennius explained that if they let the army go, they’d win Rome’s friendship. If they slaughtered them they’d weaken Rome terribly and show the Samnites weren’t to be trifled with.
I hate both these options, Dad - isn’t there a middle way?
The Herennian answer is our second lesson.
No. In such things there isn’t a middle way. Don’t leave your opponent still equipped whilst still your enemy. No half measures. You have to commit, one way or the other.
Pontius didn’t listen. He continued with his desire for a middle way. He let the Romans surrender to him but forced them to pass under a yoke as symbol of their humiliation, going on their way insulted and demeaned rather than with the hand of friendship.
Thus his bloodless solution ended the Second Samnite War - but its insult led to the Third. There was no fourth, as there were no more Samnites.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
They say something along the lines of… we are ensuring that dangerous misinformation isn’t spread. You wouldn’t want that, would you?
There are two main issues.
First, in a robust democracy society should be able to bear misinformation, rebutting it not suppressing it
2/5
(Which after all lends it an alluring patina of the illicit, the underground);
Secondly, it’s so hard to determine what is misinformation & what is legitimate disseminating information or perspectives that happen to disagree with those prevailing amongst the decisionmakers.
3/5
Philip Wareing was 25 years old when his Spitfire exploded.
Flying out of Kenley Aerodrome, at that time in August 1940 mostly a smoking ruin at which the pilots slept under the wings of their planes,
Sergeant Wareing was one of seven British airmen engaging thirty German ME109s in the air over the Channel and – as the combat drifted southwards – above Calais.
He’d shot one German fighter down when, in his words, his “lovely Spitfire was riddled like a sieve.” Hit by flak from the ground as well as by enemy planes, on fire, his propeller having failed, his radiator taken out of action,
#Deanehistory 162. This is the story of the 99 call made during the British and Irish Lions tour of South Africa in 1974. if you dislike sporting stories, or robust collective self-defence, don’t read this one, and write a robust letter of complaint to the NATO alliance.
The Lions team is a combined squad of English, Irish, Welsh and Scottish players. Periodically this handpicked group tours another rugby playing nation.
In 1974, the run of play was decisively in the visiting team’s favour. However, in the course of the tour the Lions felt that violent play against them by South African players was not being properly penalised, during or after games.
Lord Arthur Hill was a British soldier, devoted to the Duke of Wellington. Wellington valued his services in return, but had a lot on his plate preparing to fight Napoleon & seemingly forgot to put Arthur’s name to the team sheet.
Thus it was that, a mere two days before the Battle of Waterloo, Arthur received a message to come at once to the Duke's side to serve as his Aide-De-Camp. Being in London when the message reaching him, he sped immediately to Dover.
There were no sailings available – perhaps because the climax of the conflict was looming? – so Arthur hired a rowboat for the then rather large sum of £22, and with the owner to help him, promptly rowed himself across the Channel.
I had a discussion about asylum seekers coming to the UK on GB News earlier this evening. As many will not have seen it, and for those who’ve asked what I said, here it is.🧵
(I am not tagging in those with whom I debated, mindful of how such discussions can go online. I have decided to post this; they haven’t. But I will make it clear to them that I of course welcome discussion – IF they want to.)
My starting point is this. Britain is a generous country. It is right to give asylum to the needy, especially those to whom we owe a debt like Afghans who helped us in conflict.
#Deanehistory 157. The Lost Gardens of Heligan. Hat tip SH.
Heligan was the country seat of the Trelawnys for four hundred years.
Buying the Heligan estate outside Mevagissey in Cornwall in the 16th century, they built a new manor house;
rebuilt in 1692, although handsome, it is not what we are interested in today.
Henry Hawkins Tremayne, a priest, began work on the gardens in the late 1700s. Thomas Gray was commissioned to create a plan and the gardens were laid out. Succeeding generations of Trelawnys continued his work, adding “The Jungle” with its subtropical plants