Everyone needs to hear about the RESTRICT Act (S. 686). This bill is also currently known as the "Tik Tok ban" by many. But, it looks as though we were all deceived again. The Tik Tok ban is nothing but a distraction while they try to push the RESTRICT Act into law.
If this bill gets passed, we lose almost all privacy we have. The attached screenshots highlight only a few of my concerns with this bill;
"Any software, hardware, or any other product or service integral to the telecommunications products and services" with over 1,000,000
users would now be at the governments disposal to review, prosecute, and take possession of. They can "review" any and all of your personal information without even notifying you that they are doing so. They can ban any game, application, or thing they deem fit
if it "poses a risk".
The RESTRICT Act (S. 686) would allow the government to access all of the data on your video devices if it is a service that uses over 1,000,000 people, THIS INCLUDES SERVICES LIKE RING DOORBELL/INHOME SECURITY CAMERAS and so much more.
A VPN won't help you get around this either, if caught using a privacy device such as a VPN, you will face up to 20 years in prison AND/OR up to $1,000,000 in fines.
We NEED to bring attention to this and tell our elected officials that we do NOT support the RESTRICT Act.
This person just outed himself/herself as mentally ill displaying classic psychopathologic avoidance behavior having little ability to cope with the realities of life. They seem to be fostering this behavior in our youth to boot. Bring back trade schools!
Though the COVID EUA data was manipulated to make it appear that symptom severity presented less in modified mRNA recipients, the truth was it didn’t. 0.345% > than saline placebo. That said, the study did not allow for the time required for the harmful adaptive and innate immune modification that was anticipated by this technology, which would ultimately cause those recipients to present with worsening of disease.
“COVID-19 vaccines designed to elicit neutralising antibodies may sensitise vaccine recipients to more severe disease than if they were not vaccinated. Vaccines for SARS, MERS and RSV have never been approved, and the data generated in the development and testing of these vaccines suggest a serious mechanistic concern: that vaccines designed empirically using the traditional approach (consisting of the unmodified or minimally modified coronavirus viral spike to elicit neutralising antibodies), be they composed of protein, viral vector, DNA or RNA and irrespective of delivery method, may worsen COVID-19 disease via antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE). This risk is sufficiently obscured in clinical trial protocols and consent forms for ongoing COVID-19 vaccine trials that adequate patient comprehension of this risk is unlikely to occur, obviating truly informed consent by subjects in these trials.”
Did this true informed consent happen? As this paper suggests, the fear of inability to convey true risk to subjects were of concern. How many that received the injections only to find they continue to get covid infections with some severe sequelae? Was this risk clearly spelled out before administering the shot?
I’ve mentioned it before and I guess since I’m c e n s o r e d, let’s chat again about Human metapneumovirus? It is predominant, and why you’re sick for 2 weeks, lethargic and neg for covid and flu.
Historically, it presents like a cold. This time it’s different and quite transmissible. My question is, WHY? @btysonmd @GeorgeFareed2
@btysonmd @GeorgeFareed2 It’s nothing to freak about, but it’s annoying. It lingers.
Can any voiceprint / voice ID specialists do a little favor please? I Renner being so disturbed by this. It sent me to tears. If we can identify the voice, that would be helpful.
Warning: sensitive material
It was alleged to be J Podesta. I would want to be sure. Would be easy for an expert to verify.