The Mississippians had many familiar things in their cosmos: a firmament above, a world tree or axis mundi, an underworld. But some aspects were also very distinctive.
The Underworld was considered an underwater realm, associated with the night sky, and associated with the piasa. The piasa had several variants, one of which was the underwater panther.
(I have a completely unfounded theory that this partly refers to giant otters.)
The winged, horned serpent variant may be distantly related to Quetzalcoatl.
Note, however, that it usually has a rattle.
Several symbols that appear on art let us pinpoint the scene as occurring in different parts of the cosmos. A, surrounded by feathers, represents the Above World. B is a solar image and associated with the Middle World. C swirls like a whirlpool, pointing to the Below World.
Different versions of the "eye-surround" motif, D and E above, also tell you whether a figure is from the Above or Below World.
The ogee, 7f above, is a portal between worlds.
The striped pole, G above, is an axis mundi, just like the cedar tree.
With all this in mind, we can return to the picture we started with, prepared to understand it much better.
We see the symbols for the three levels, creatures with appropriate eye markings, watery/starry Below world, and the axis mundi. There is also a path of souls.
Once again, this comes from Hero, Hawk, and Open Hand. Specifically, this is from F. Kent Reilly III's essay.
Definitely worth owning.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Is serial killer fiction a peculiarly liberal preoccupation?
A liberal society attempts to remain neutral on questions of ultimate value, of the ends to which we dedicate our lives. It refuses to judge.
Our values, then, are private choices. "Choices," as if they are optional and we simply make a decision.
We might also say "judgments," as if they could still be reasoned about, but not definitively, or they would have a claim on other people.
Maybe "preferences."
And during the most prosperous period of the most advanced liberal societies, we get a genre about monsters whose deep-seated values are utterly hostile to the rest of society.
About preferences we cannot help but judge as wrong.
A Greek study session involved, if I remember correctly, first having Kirkpatrick read a chunk in Greek, pausing to make minor grammar notes, and then allowing Lewis to translate as much as he could, consulting his books.
They didn't read the entire Iliad, though, just the parts more directly concerning Achilles.
Where many classical schools separate languages and classics, this is how Lewis got them both, and he loved it.
If he could have spent his whole life this way, he would have.
I've seen people throwing around the "ackshually, the Jooz are Khazars" thing. Sometimes they limit this specifically to the Ashkenazi, rather than Jews in general.
A few genetics links pushing back:
This is what the genetic "family tree" of Jewish groups look like. They all descend from Ancient Near Eastern populations, including the Ashkenazis.
Here are genetic distances between various Jewish groups. The Ashkenazis are clustered pretty tightly with other Jewish groups, setting aside ones that intermarried with non-Mediterranean populations.
What is the connection between controversial academic LEO STRAUSS and eccentrice Ozark farmer BUCK NELSON?
Read quickly, before Twitter bans me for disclosing THE TRUTH
I have, through certain secret connections, come into possession of a draft copy of the work Leo Strauss was laboring to finish when he died.
Close friends say he considered it his "magnum opus," that it would "shake the foundations of the modern world," and "save the republic."
In this work, in the central chapter, he makes a single reference to Nelson. In private correspondence, he revealed that this footnote was "the key to all his thought."
Posting actual pictures of the document would be too dangerous, but I can copy the footnote here: