This course takes you deeply into the design and implementation of web apps with Python, JavaScript, and SQL using frameworks like Django, React, and Bootstrap.
Learn about the development of 2D and 3D interactive games in this hands-on course, as you explore the design of games such as Super Mario Bros., Pokémon, Angry Birds, and more.
Learn about mobile app development with React Native, a popular framework maintained by Facebook that enables cross-platform native apps using JavaScript without Java or Swift.
Everyones using ChatGPT for content writing. Meanwhile Claude is quietly outperforming it on every platform.
I switched 3 months ago and my engagement jumped 340% across all socials.
The secret isnt Claude itself. Its the 10 prompts that make it write like an actual human, not a corporate robot.
Here they are: 🧵
1. The Coffee Shop Test
Prompt:
"Write this like you're explaining it to a friend over coffee. No marketing speak. No corporate jargon. Just straight talk about [topic]. If it sounds like a LinkedIn post, rewrite it."
Claude actually gets this. ChatGPT still sounds like it's pitching a SaaS product.
2. Voice Finder
Prompt:
"Give me 5 different ways to say this same idea. Make each one sound like a different person wrote it - one cynical, one excited, one skeptical, one matter-of-fact, one surprised."
This is how I find MY voice. Pick the version that feels most natural, then Claude refines it.
After 2 years of using AI for research, I can say these tools have revolutionized my workflow.
So here are 15 prompts across Claude, Gemini, ChatGPT, and Perplexity that transformed my research (and could do the same for you):
1/ LITERATURE REVIEW → Claude Sonnet 4.5
"Analyze these 30 papers on [TOPIC]. Find contradictions, research gaps, and emerging debates. Prioritize findings that challenge consensus."
Why Claude: 200K context window = reads entire papers, not just abstracts.
2/ RESEARCH QUESTION REFINEMENT → ChatGPT 4o
"My broad interest: [TOPIC]. Generate 10 falsifiable research questions. For each: explain methodology, expected contribution, and why current literature can't answer it."
Why 4o: Extended reasoning catches scope creep and logical gaps.