1) The fight for Nigeria’s top office has taken an interesting turn. The inclusion of @officialABAT drug charges in @PeterObi election petition is as much high level trolling as it is a legitimate prayer.
2) It is highly unlikely a foreign conviction from the early 90s will exclude someone from contesting but as part of the petition it will have to be litigated & the tribunal & most likely Supreme Court will have to litigate on whether someone with a drug case can be President.
3) From an Influence Op point of view it's a clever tactic. Irrespective of the outcome this issue will be part of Nigeria’s legal precedents, it will be fodder for foreign/ local media, comedians, late night talk shows (#NarcosNigeria jokes will abound)
4) It raises the reputational cost of doing business for Nigeria’s currently unlooking Western partners. The US will clearly be uncomfortable being drawn into this, any attempt to withhold information (deliberately or not) will be seized upon as evidence of US/ western hypocrisy.
5) The other effect is on APC itself. While the crux of the petition is rigging, this topic will end up generating the most noise taking up time & effort & discomfiting them.
7) APC of course could take control of the narrative, Tinubu to come out with an exclusive interview acknowledging the drug case & forfeitures but painting it as a youthful mistake & being misled by bad friends. He could then present his story as one of redemption
8) In which he turned his life around by becoming a mentor (not godfather), businessman & champion of democracy (if APC uses this storyline I expect a fee sha).
Either way the #ObidientMovement continues in its mission of shaking tables irrespective of whose sitting at them
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Written before Achebe died. Seems apt now
THERE WAS A COUNTRY- A REVIEW
The first thing I will say is that this is not Achebe’s best book, be it fiction or non fiction. Nor will I say it is his most relevant; as Things Fall Apart still wins that accolade just for being what it is
It is however one of the most relevant books about Nigeria by a Nigerian. Not just for what it says but for what it causes to be said.
Once it was published the usual suspects inevitably emerged from the wood work.
But then any book written about Biafra, from the perspective of a Biafran particularly one as high profile as Achebe will elicit a spirited response, it would be equally depressing if it didn’t.
1) Nigeria 2023: to coup or not to coup? Almost every conversation about the upcoming elections involve the question ‘Will there be a coup?’
Lets examine this.
Will there be a coup in Nigeria in or around the Presidential election?
Yes and No
2)NO:
Operational:
(a)Manpower: a coup requires troops, with weapons & ammo. The ability to mobilise troops of sufficient quantity to capture & defend Aso Rock, much less defend Abuja from counter attack is challenging.
3)Despite the significant insecurity surrounding Abuja, even if the troops in Kaduna, Nasarawa etc were to advance on Abuja they would have to fight through the Brigade of Guards unless of course they are part of the coup, which makes the conspiracy much deeper & more complex
1] The Siege of #Abuja has begun, we can draw interesting parallels with the 1969 siege of Owerri by Biafran forces in that you have a nominally weaker force, gradually encircling a much more powerful and well equipped one in order to destroy it but I would rather not.
2]Lets address the nature of this fight, I believe the enemy (or enemies) have broken the campaign down into several phases (1) Preparation of the Battlespace (2) Shaping the Battlespace (3) Isolating the Battlespace (4) The Attack (5) Exploitation.
3]I believe we are currently in Phase2/3.
Phase 1: The preparation of the battlespace has been going on for many years. There have been Boko Haram, ISWAP, Ansaru Darul Islam etc elements in the States surrounding Abuja for decades. They have been mostly benign,
The only western power to have won a near peer conflict in the past 40 years is the UK. Defeating Argentina at range on land, in the air, on, under & over the sea, despite being out numbered in all those areas.
This was not due to superior tech or equipment. Argentina had modern ships, submarines, aircraft carriers, fast jet, ground attack aircraft, armour, artillery. & much more of them than the UK did, either on the island or a short hop away on the mainland.
They lost because the British military was qualitatively better. And the foundation of that qualitative superiority was doing the most basic things properly. So when things went wrong (ships/helicopters lost etc), Soldiers could simply pick up their bergans, walk, fight, dig in
There appears to be a certain amount of denial & coping regards Ukraine’s current reverses on one hand & gloating on the other.
This is the problem when war is treated as just another form of family entertainment, with people waiting for plot twists or the hero to save the day
War consists of campaigns, operations, battles & skirmishes. One side can win every battle and lose the war (US: Vietnam), one side can consistently take horrific casualties & still prevail (Soviets: WW2). It is broadly immaterial unless viewed as a whole.
By 1942 the UK had lost the Battle of France, the Norwegian & Greek campaigns, was losing the first Battle of the Atlantic, lost Singapore, Burma, Hong Kong, the enemy was at the gates of Egypt in North Africa. The home land was under daily bombardment. We still won the war
Putin’s popularity amongst Africans & support for the invasion of Ukraine seems to follow fairly predictable patterns (1)The reflexive ‘anti west’ attitude of many Africans has made this a fairly simplistic case of my ‘enemies enemy’ without any interrogation of the deeper issues
(2) The Russian narrative & propaganda supports the pre disposed biases of some Africans (NATO wants to invade Russia by setting up bases = the west wants to destabilise Africa by setting up bases) (3) The Soviet history of supporting liberation wars against imperial powers
(many of whom are now NATO countries) has been inherited by Russia (4) Putin’s strongman image resonates with the African perception of leadership, his no nonsense, militarized approach & rejection of western social liberalism particularly gay rights is an easy sell