Some Basic facts: CHARM 3 depleted uranium anti-tank used by Challenger 2 is not "nuclear". It is also not coming from US for very good reasons: US doesn't use it nor make it. They have their own DU types, NOT compatible with Challenger 2's 2-piece ammo because they are 1-piece.
Like all armor-piercing ammunition of this kind, CHARM 3 does NOT explode. Doesn't contain explosive at all. It pierces armour by means of speed & mass. DU has great density and once appropriately treated becomes a better penetrator than next best option which is tungsten steel.
Only explosive part of CHARM 3 is the launch charge which is used to fire it (the large orange cylinder). CHARM 3 is stored in the back of the turret and needs no particular protection as, again, is not explosive. Launch charges are stored below the turret ring in sealed bins.
CHARM 3 is expensive, precious, and no longer in production, so training is actually done with a steel rod projectile, not with the actual CHARM 3. Note the color blue: if you see blue in NATO weaponry, it means it's a training/inert weapon. In short: no DU if it is blue.
For general interest purpose, going to the right of image we see the rest of the CR2's weaponry: the white bag is the launch charge for the Smoke shell (next to it) and the HESH (High Explosive Squashing Head) shell, next again. The "coke can" is a smoke grenade for concealment.
Obviously, as i said earlier, Blue means training/inert: in photo you see HESH trg rounds. HESH kills by squishing itself against armour and exploding. Force of blast causes spalling, aka the separation of fragments on the inside. The tank's own armour becomes the tank's enemy.
While HESH is no longer as effective as it used to be as an anti-armour solution (anti-spalling solutions got good over time) it works plenty good against structures. Challenger 2's gun offers better elevation/depression than several of its peers, which isn't a bad thing in urban
Now, i said Challenger 3 ammunition is 2-piece but it is technically 3-piece. A special cartridge, in fact, is fired from the breech of L30 cannon to ignite the launch charge. You can see said cartridges in the left photo and a magazine of them between the Smoke and HESH shells.
A magazine of cartridges is inserted into the breech of the L30 cannon and after the first shot the cartridges are loaded automatically without the loader having to touch them again. Some cartridge action can be observed in this turret simulator during training.
HESH was the reason for the controversial rifling of the L30 cannon (and its predecessor L11 on the CHIEFTAIN, which was the first 120mm in NATO back in its days). Big HESH round, more explosive, more explosive = more spalling / spalling effect even through very thick armour.
Now Armor Piercing, Fin-Stabilized, Discarding Sabot ammo fired from a smoothbore for maximum speed is best, but for a long time HESH was. And at one point British Army was "playing" with 183 mm guns of naval derivation to fire VERY BIG HESH to really shit on soviet heavy tanks.
Arguably, the British Army by the end of World War 2 had had absolutely enough of guns which struggled to hole enemy heavy tanks at long range. A multitude of post-war projects for heavy tank destroyers with massive cannons to deal with soviet heavies tell you what the mood was!
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I've been trying to look a bit deeper into the recent US-UK-Australia contract award to Corvid Technologies for "sub-orbital" rocket vehicles with hinted launches at Benbecula and Woomera. From available contract papers, two "classes" of rockets are included in the award. (1)
[...] vehicles are required for, but not limited to: Air and Missile Defense Radar, Aegis Ballistic Missile Defense, Maritime Missile Defense, Sea Based Terminal, Fleet Training, RailGun, Hyper Velocity Projectile, Foreign Military Sales and other programs... (2)
Short Range rockets are "1 or 2 stage vehicles consisting of a Terrier Mk12/Mk 70 1st stage and either improved Orion M112 or Lynx Mk 104 2nd stage. Some vehicles will be required to provide dispersion control through use of canard controlled system or other guidance systems. (3)
As I had guessed, here it is: SPEAR 3 first guided firing. I'll add one thing here which is pretty welcome: look at the rack used. It seems the Common Weapon Launcher for Typhoon is alive. You can just about see in the photos were the side attachment points fit when in use.
Look at the SPEAR 3 fit used for the test, and at the sides of the rack. Compare to mock-ups for the Common Weapon Launcher. We can still hope (eventually) someone asks for hanging more weapons from it to make the most out of it, and Typhoon as a whole.
On other hand, we haven't yet seen the quadruple rack for SPEAR 3 out in the open. Won't be used on Typhoon despite very early graphics. I guess Typhoon does not really like the aerodynamics (and length!) of the quadruple. If that's the case, SDB is also probably a no-no.
What is the Mobile Fires Platform meant to be? A General Support or Close Support howitzer? Some considerations on why sharing a 155/52 howitzer does not make different weapon systems equally adept at the same mission.
GS artillery is held at a high level and is employed at long range to suddenly Destroy targets that expose themselves, reinforcing lower level tasks as opportunity permits/moment requires. It is meant to switch between tasks frequently & ideally prove decisive when it steps in.
Close Support artillerymust lay down suppressive fire for as long as it takes for the infantry to get ONTO a target. It must LAST. It must supply smoke curtains. It must ideally be able to fire really close to friendly infantry to keep the enemy suppressed as long as possible.
The WESTMINSTER dilemma. Fate of HMS Westminster remains unclear without a final answer about whether her refit is going ahead or not. Her material state was found very poor once taken into basin for refit preparations and in July initial estimate for her refit was 100 million.
WESTMINSTER is one of the 8 ASW, so one of the precious ones meant to work well into the 2030s. Navy certainly not thrilled about losing her early, but 10-year budget allocation for Type 23s upkeeps is 679,7 million (6 sept 2023 written answer) and she'd eat up much of that.
HMS IRON DUKE (GP), refitted earlier, was also in poor state and her refit not only cost at least 103 million, but took an endless 49 months (May 19-Jun 23). Time here is a variable that's getting just as important as money. If Westminster returns not before 2027, is it worth it?
Under Project NJORD, new radars / new complementary sensors are going to be installed to deal with the growth of the wind turbine fields. Under the MOD Procurement Pipeline, works begin on the radar heads at Neatishead, Brizlee Wood and Buchan in Dec 2025.
Staxton Wold is planned to follow in October 2026, while Benbecula, Portreath, Saxa Vord will be touched up Oct 2027. Each is getting a 210 million package of uplifts. Solutions include replacing existing radars; adding gap fill radar and/or optical sensors, UAVs & LEO satellites
An RFI last year for new Multi Mode Radars for static sites asked industry for a 5-year outlook on new capabilities to improve target tracking both in the face of wind turbines and at very high altitudes, including ballistic missile defence and residual Space Domain Awareness.
Letter by James Cartlidge MP to Defence Committee adds more info to ongoing programs:
- prototype series Challenger 3s assembled over the autumn and go to trials early 2024. Shephard reports 8 P-series
- contracts for new EPSOM modular armour and TROPHY APS both planned in-year
For GMLRS, "increased numbers" confirmed but not detailed. GMLRS Extended Range approval next summer (tests for ER ongoing, so there a slip from this summer). UK demonstrators for Area Effects and Sensors Dispenser on track. He says France MIGHT join Land Precision Strike project
Regarding Air Defence, more Sky Sabre launchers coming with decision "in summer" (DSEI announcement?), also Assessment Phase launch for:
- Integrated AD C2
- Medium & Short range AD sensors
- Mounted SHORAD (Stormer replacement)
- specialist "Counter-Small (C-RAM, loitering, UAS)