Read on Twitter
Never thought I'd see experts and journalists insisting that a lab-acquired infection is not a lab leak but a zoonosis.
At this point, how can anyone in the public understand what these experts actually mean when they say an outbreak started from zoonotic spillover?
At this point, how can anyone in the public understand what these experts actually mean when they say an outbreak started from zoonotic spillover?
If evidence turns up that a precursor of the pandemic virus was being worked with in a Wuhan lab - without evidence of genetic engineering - are these experts going to say "See, we were right. It was a zoonotic spillover!"
If scientists get infected in the lab and it spreads out into their city, are they going to tell their biosafety officer, "There wasn't a lab leak. Zoonosis happened."
I can't believe the natural #OriginOfCovid strategy now is "when I said a lab leak was a conspiracy theory in 2020, I didn't realize this included natural viruses infecting people in the lab."
Maybe you should've clarified your statements better in 2020 then.
Maybe you should've clarified your statements better in 2020 then.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
