Jacopo Scita Profile picture
Mar 29 13 tweets 5 min read Twitter logo Read on Twitter
A short 🧵 on today's (not so) breaking news: Saudi Arabia's cabinet has approved the MoU to become a dialogue partner of the #SCO.

A bit of context, first. 1/10

reuters.com/world/riyadh-j…
The SCO is a strange-yet-fascinating beast: A China-led international organisation that does all and nothing, which spans from East Asia to South Asia, from Central Asia to West Asia, including old-time rivals (India and Pakistan) and Eurasian giants (Russia). 2/10
Yet, because of the differences and rivalries between its members and the consensus-based mode of government, SCO "functions more as a forum for discussion and engagement than a formal regional alliance" (as put by @NicoleGrajewski washingtoninstitute.org/policy-analysi…). 3/10
A nothing burger, some will say, but still a tasty one for many countries across Asia and the Middle East, as well as for its chef and sous-chef, China and Russia.

Saudi Arabia is now an SCO's dialogue partner, the third membership level. 4/10
eng.sectsco.org/docs/about/faq…
Now, the news of KSA joining the SCO as a dialogue partner was broken at the 2021 summit in Dushanbe, and the status was then granted a year later in Samarkand. So, today's announcement was expected and, I'd say, mostly procedural. 5/10
Notably, at the 2022 Dushanbe summit, Qatar was also accepted as a dialogue partner. Iran, instead, obtained full member status after almost 15 years of tormented negotiations (see Nicole's piece linked before). 6/10
news.cgtn.com/news/2022-09-1…
Saudi Arabia will not need 15 years to be elevated to full membership (it's just a matter of political will, and I don't see huge barriers). For now, though, it has entered the SCO at the lowest pyramid step. As it should be. 7/10
Now, the beef. Is this a cataclysm for the old world/Middle East order? I doubt. The SCO remains a mostly symbolic organisation with no resemblance to an alliance. Yet, being part of it matters and signals the will to become more and more part of China's worldview. 8/10
There isn't a direct link between the Iran-KSA deal and today's announcement (as said, this has been in the making since Sept. 2022). But China's momentum in the Persian Gulf continues building up, and regional countries want to be part of it, thus fuelling it. 9/10
Saudi Arabia has quickly understood that it could gain a lot from multipolarity. Therefore, it's favouring it (SCO is part of this calculus). UAE, Qatar, and many other states are doing the same. Would you blame them? Their bid, however, is not a zero-sum game. 10/10
Bonus: the always bright @SinemCngz has a great thread on the broader context of Saudi (and Persian Gulf) tilt towards non-Western organisations.
Bonus 2: This chapter by @eleonoratafuro and Filippo Costa Buranelli is an excellent starting point to understand what the SCO is and isn't.
Bonus 3: Obviously, @jonathandfulton is your go to guy for everything China-Persian Gulf:

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Jacopo Scita

Jacopo Scita Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @jacoposcita

Jul 8, 2020
[Short thread] I see a lot of hype brewing around the #ChinaIran 25y agreement. Frankly, I do understand why, but, folks, it's not a signed document that will change the dynamics of Sino-Iranian relations, which have been quite consistent since 1979. [1/9]
The document under scrutiny is the formalisation of the 2016 CSP. Rouhani and Xi basically agreed on everything that is now on the proposal back then. Very little has been realised in the last 4 years, esp. in key sectors such as oil, infrastructures, etc. Why? [2/9]
Well, definitely not because the document wasn't there. More likely because China-Iran relations don't exist in a vacuum. Strong dynamics are going on both within and around this partnership. At the bilateral level, there are financial, technological, and political limits. [3/9]
Read 13 tweets
Jan 3, 2020
I spent some time thinking about why Soleimani was the (almost) perfect target for a US retaliation. Here are my ideas. Premise one: I still believe this was an extremely problematic operation & the consequences will be huge and dangerous for many people in the region (1/12)
Premise two: I’ve absolutely no sympathy for Qassem Soleimani. However, my job is not about sympathy or antipathy. It’s about trying to understand reality, overcoming bias as much as possible. (2/12)
So why Qassem Souleimani was the (almost) perfect target? Well, not because of its enormous power and influence. People like @nargesbajoghli and @AOstovar have already questioned the largely overestimated impact that his death will have on IRGC effectiveness & strength (3/12)
Read 12 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(