Cartesian-Kantian christianity-and-(neo)platonism-derived POV: OMG, philosophical zombie are so scary! The unheimlich of the solypsism and the uncertainty!
classical Buddhist POV: aren't we all philosophical zombies and yet there are no zombie at all, since no "true" soul, mind, will, self or persona even exists or not-exists?
Buddhist and freudo-lacanian POV: not only we are philosophical zombie if we truly believe in things like soul, mind, will, self or persona. But it any of these exists, there'd be no difference between a zombie and a non-zombie out of the perspective...
... moreover, such a thing would act out of un-"self" impulses like the Todestrieb, so even such a non-zombie would be a zombie of some sort. In the end, the Dazhilun question'd still valid: ....
“How is it that you give rise to the notion of self in a body that is not yours? (何以不自身中生計我)”
웅녀/熊女:
Moglie di Hwanung 환웅/桓雄, figlio del dio celeste Hwanin 환인/桓因, genitrice di Tan'gun Wanggŏm 단군왕검/檀君王儉, a sua volta fondatore di Asadal 아사달/阿斯達...
... il Samguk Yusa racconta che, competendo con una tigre per diventare sua sposa, venne chiesto ad entrambi gli animali di nutrirsi di aglio e artemisia e stare in una grotta per 100 giorni. Mentre la tigre fallì la sfida Ungnyŏ divenne la sposa del dio.
Questa, in sintesi, il mito fondativo di Kochosŏn 고조선/古朝鮮, il primo mitico regno coreano nonché base per la fondazione dei regni successivi dopo l'invasione prima Han 漢 e poi Yan 燕 e la creazione delle comanderie Han 漢四郡.
The classic and more ancient method of divination consists in asking to a shaman (called mudang if female and baksu if male, depending on region). Then a rite (kut 굿) is arranged.
Usually once pay the shaman by nature in order to provide materials to the rite.
Here I'm talking about modern shamanism ( 무교 巫教,무속 巫俗).
Daoist-based methods exist too, but they are performed by non-elective shamans