SDL Profile picture
Mar 31, 2023 6 tweets 3 min read Read on X
the left post is so ungodly stupid

you wanna know what actually reduces child sexual abuse?

teaching kids what sex is, what consent is, and why the latter lets them refuse the former

it's called "sex ed", and conservatives *hate* it ImageImage
What does preventative sex ed look like?

In short, it focuses on telling kids what sex and sexual abuse (SA) is, why SA is wrong, how to say no, and why they're not to blame for their abuse.

Topping Barron 2009: literature review: Image
They work. First, they build knowledge.

In the Walsh et al 2015 meta-study, preventative sex ed programs increased protective behavior against CSA (x5.71), increased knowledge about CSA, did not increase anxiety or fear about CSA (insignificant): ImageImage
Second, they increase reporting.

Campo Favero 2019: literature review: all evidence available suggests preventative sex ed increases children's reporting of sexual abuse (one school studied *doubled* its CSA reporting rate): ImageImage
This is all particularly frustrating because CSA victims are overwhelmingly abused by family (34%) and acquaintances (59%) -- not strangers (7%)!

Kids are not getting abused by drag queens in the library, they're getting abused by dads, uncles, and friends. Image
That makes it far more important for kids to know what sexual abuse is and how to report it.

Sexual abuse often flows from power -- parent over child, elder over junior, friend over friend -- and kids need to know they have the power to fight back.

Knowledge *is* power.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with SDL

SDL Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @SocDoneLeft

Aug 31, 2025
I'm sorry, but not even DSA members read our "platform"

It's a wishlist, not a serious minimal program, and includes dumb shit like ending USAID!

Zohran not "decriminalizing all misdemeanors" -- which includes, eg, most domestic violence charges! -- is not "distancing from DSA"
DSA's "platform" is 38 pages with 287 (!!) bullet points

It's >90% good policy, like Medicare For All & end the Senate

But has a bunch of stinkers, like "abolish USAID", "free **all** people from involuntary confinement", "eliminate sales taxes" 🤢, "protect small farmers" 🤮
100% agree on this. US police are terrible, in part, because they spend so much time enforcing misdemeanor offenses (like drug offenses) rather than halting & investigating serious crime (roughly 1/2 of murderers get away with it!).
Read 5 tweets
Jul 13, 2025
Sawant is VERY funny

- narrowly wins Seattle city council seat as open socialist
- Trot, loves to hate DSA
- looks like she will lose recall election
- joins DSA, we canvass for her, she wins by <1%
- resigns her city council position
- becomes a full-time anti-DSA podcaster
- her Trot org splits in three (lol), she takes ~200 ppl
- she talks shit about Zohran (DSA), until he wins
- her org uses his win & face to promote her vanity campaign for US House (will get <5%)
- she talks more shit about Zohran

What can you say but opportunist? Image
"They don't want power. They want to endlessly podcast about power."
Read 4 tweets
Mar 12, 2025
The idea that "atheists only have subjective preferences, because objective morality only exists with God" is extremely funny.

It's been 2400 years, and theocratic theists have yet to give a single good response to the Euthyphro dilemma. Image
This is Hobbes' response: Might makes right.

Who cares if God is arbitrary? As absolute ruler, he has "irresistible power", and you must kneel.

But we reject this for weaker tyrants with smaller arbitrary demands. Why accept it from the strongest tyrant?
If God "reveals morality through his character", then morality is independent of God. He transmits moral law. Back to horn 1.

If God's character alone determines what is moral, then morality is arbitrary. He sets moral law as he pleases. Back to horn 2.
Read 18 tweets
Feb 5, 2025
The Nazis privatized dozens of state-owned enterprises. In fact, that's what "privatization" was coined to describe.

The Nazis wanted to place all political & economic power in the hands of a small group of loyalist rich elites & state oligarchs. And so they did. Image
The Nazis crushed unions. (They created a single, state-controlled one that never struck and never demanded higher wages.)

The Nazis dramatically expanded wealth inequality (right) while barely raising real wages (left).

Which party does that sound like? Image
Image
Conservatives never seem to understand: Leftists want **equality of power**.

Big government (or small) is just a means to an end. That end is isonomia -- equal power over society -- which we today call "democracy".

Why should Musk have 400 billion times more power than you do? Image
Read 4 tweets
Jan 21, 2025
For good and bad, the world was on demographic track for a Long American Century.

At current growth, fertility, & immigration levels: The US would be the ONLY world power with exponential total GDP growth by 2100.

If Trump ends birthright citizenship, he ends that trajectory. Image
"America First" types ignore how immigration makes the USA stronger: It makes us bigger!

Remember when Japan was going to take over the world? Japan never stopped growing more productive -- it just stopped growing more populous.

Without immigration, the US would be shrinking. Image
All the world's geniuses want to move here.

Trumpists would turn them away -- and lower innovation, lower growth, lower population, weaken the USA -- all to please mediocre White racists that can't intellectually compete.

Trumpists are genuinely too stupid to run an empire. Image
Read 4 tweets
Sep 3, 2024
New blogpost:

Socialists will overwhelmingly vote for Kamala Harris. 🧵 Image
Most polls only let voters identify as "liberal", "moderate", or "conservative". To know how socialists will vote, that's worthless.

Last month, University of New Hampshire added "socialist" to their list.

About 90% of socialist likely voters will vote for Kamala in ME, NH, VT: Image
The same rate holds across the US.

In August, Fairleigh Dickinson University also added "socialist" to their ideology list.

The result? Again, about 90% of self-identified socialist registered voters will vote Kamala. Image
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(