Stalin’s Apologists (31 March 1933). News Not Fit to Print.
On 29 March 1933 Gareth Jones broke the news of the Communist genocide in the USSR that we now call the Holodomor. Two days later the New York Times and its Moscow correspondent Walter Duranty called it fake news. 🧵
For Jones breaking the story, see my two previous threads here:
As for Duranty’s and the New York Times’s attack on Jones, the best source is S. J. Taylor’s book, from which I’ve obviously pinched the title for this series of threads.
Referring to Jone’s first article and speech at Chatham House in London on 30 March that I refer to in the threads above, Taylor then relates how another American correspondent in Moscow, Eugene Lyons, later claimed Duranty and others decided to attack Jones.
Lyons was a fairly famous journalist back then and here’s a little from Wiki before we get to his account in Taylor’s book.
TASS — Russian News Agency
CPUSA — Communist Party of USA
Now for Taylor, picking up the story after Jone’s first article and speech at Chatham House:
At this point I would conclude by linking to a previous thread about Stalin rewarding Duranty for his services with a private interview on 25 December 1933, but because @elonmusk's Twitter banned my old page, the link is dead and I haven’t recreated it yet.
I will post some of it now, however. This is how Duranty himself later told the story:
Yet there was more to it than that. Duranty wasn't just writing as he pleased. Nor was he just writing as Stalin pleased. Above all he was writing as President Roosevelt pleased. Indeed, Duranty had met with Roosevelt in July 1932 as the New York Times reported on 26 July:
I don’t think we know what was said, but it’s safe to assume they were coordinating a media strategy to manufacture consent for America’s official recognition of the USSR. Never mind they were murdering millions.
I can imagine Roosevelt laughing if Duranty used his line on him: “You can’t make an omelet without breaking eggs.”
Roosevelt was certainly chummy with Stalin. In fact, Roosevelt’s ambassador to Russia, William Bullitt, told another American Communist and journalist Louis Fischer in 1933:
“The President, Jack Reed [another American Communist], and I are of the same strain.”
Quote in Dennis Dunn’s Caught Between Roosevelt & Stalin, p. 22
Our Republic and press are indeed certainly falling together.
a crowd of civilians and soldiers began marching down Broadway towards Bowling Green where an equestrian statue of George III stood outside of Washington’s headquarters at No. 1 Broadway.
9 July 1776: Washington’s Army Receives the Declaration
“In New York City, July 9 was a day much like all the other days of the past week,” writes Bruce Bliven in Under the Guns. “The Americans had constantly watched the long line of British warships filling the Kills, but there had been no signs of unusual activity in the fleet, and soldiers and civilians had gone about their work.” 🧵
Bliven’s Under the Guns (the best place to start if you want to understand what was going on in New York City in 1776), p. 345-54: archive.org/details/underg…
As I previously posted, the British landed on Staten Island on 2 July, the same day Congress declared independence.
William Okeley was an Englishman captured at sea and enslaved in Algiers. He and seven other English slaves surreptitiously built their own dinghy and launched it on 30 June 1644 hoping to sail to Europe and freedom. 🧵
Okeley later wrote an account of his capture, time in captivity, and harrowing flight to freedom. It was these sorts of accounts that began to turn public opinion in Western Europe and America against slavery.
Most people were taught to think of Marxism in economic terms, namely the abolition of private property and public ownership of the means of production. And Marx himself did indeed define it that way at times.
But earlier Marx defined it like this in a famous and much quoted letter to Arnold Ruge, as the New York Times did:
This beauty from James Baldwin, an African American socialist and so-called civil rights activist, appeared in the New York Times on 9 April 1967. That's was when Critical Race Theory began taking off.
I’ll quote three lines from it here and provide some more of the article in a thread:
“It is galling to be told by a Jew whom you know to be exploiting you that he cannot possibly be doing what you know he is doing because he is a Jew.”
“One does not wish, in short, to be told by an American Jew that his suffering is as great as the American Negro's suffering. It isn't, and one knows that it isn't from the very tone in which he assures you that it is.”
“In the American context, the most ironical thing about Negro anti-Semitism is that the Negro is really condemning the Jew for having become an American white man -- for having become, in effect, a Christian.”
Needless to say, that's the logic of Critical Race Theory’s and BLM’s anti-Semitism, although Baldwin, despite 90% of his article being a vitriolic anti-Semitic diatribe, ultimately claims the enemy is actually Christianity (he also suggests Europe, in which he includes Jews, and hints at “capital,” which is to say capitalism), not technically Jews. For instance, this is how he concludes the article:
“The crisis taking place in the world, and in the minds and hearts of black men everywhere, is not produced by the star of David, but by the old rugged Roman cross on which Christendom’s most celebrated Jew was murdered. And not by Jews.”
In other words, ultimately Baldwin is saying he hates Jews because they're not helping him, a black socialist, destroy Western Civilization.
Hitler was legally appointed chancellor on 30 January 1933 and the Machtergreifung (seizure of power) immediately followed. Having consolidated his dictatorship, the German military reoccupied the Rhineland on 7 March 1936. A little less than a month later Churchill wrote the “First of new series of articles, to appear regularly in the ‘Evening Despatch’.” That more or less marked the beginning of appeasement and Churchill’s fight against it. Trump could say the same thing about Republicans appeasing Marxist Democrats today. 🧵
That’s how it appeared on page 10 of the Evening Despatch on 3 April 1936. I’ve highlighted the part I highlighted above and the next paragraph, which is magnified below.